Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'indian food'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Categories

  • Articles
    • Forum Integration
    • Frontpage
  • Pages
  • Miscellaneous
    • Databases
    • Templates
    • Media

Forums

  • Cars
    • General Car Discussion
    • Tips and Resources
  • Aftermarket
    • Accessories
    • Performance and Tuning
    • Cosmetics
    • Maintenance & Repairs
    • Detailing
    • Tyres and Rims
    • In-Car-Entertainment
  • Car Brands
    • Japanese Talk
    • Conti Talk
    • Korean Talk
    • American Talk
    • Malaysian Talk
    • China Talk
  • General
    • Electric Cars
    • Motorsports
    • Meetups
    • Complaints
  • Sponsors
  • Non-Car Related
    • Lite & EZ
    • Makan Corner
    • Travel & Road Trips
    • Football Channel
    • Property Buzz
    • Investment & Financial Matters
  • MCF Forum Related
    • Official Announcements
    • Feedback & Suggestions
    • FAQ & Help
    • Testing

Blogs

  • MyAutoBlog

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Found 1 result

  1. Curry. When many of us think of Indian food, we naturally think of curry. Except, well, 'curry' isn't actually a thing. Not the word, and not even technically the food that we think of. Many of us probably think of curry as some sort of dish that has a gravy or sauce. But that is in fact a generalisation of a wide variety of Indian dishes, and also a decidedly Western invention intrinsically tied to India's Colonial past. 'Curry' as a word doesn't actually exist in the languages spoken in India, and the exact origins of the terms are not entirely clear (some trace it back to the Portuguese in the 16th century; the British subsequently used it to broadly describe a wide range of dishes without being able to grasp the various culinary nuances). Here a funny retort I found on one website: In India no one refers to dishes that have some gravy, as a curry. They'd call these dishes by their individual specific names like Malai Kofta, Matar Paneer, Dum Aloo, etc. Otherwise it'd be like calling ALL noodle dishes, "spaghetti" or walking into into a Japanese restaurant and assuming all fish is "sushi." I've never thought about this (I've never had to). But now that I have, it brings to mind my own experience with Peranakan food. I grew up eating plenty of Peranakan food, but I do realise that when I try to explain the cuisine to people who are unaware of it, it actually becomes very hard. I know the names (though often phonetically more than actually knowing the exact translation): buah keluak, rendang, sioh, babi ponteh. I know what they look and taste like, and I can cook most of them. But how do I explain them to people who do not know? And then I realise that I too default back to a Westernised norm - "it's a sort of stew", "it's like a curry". Despite its odd (and culturally loaded/problematic) origins, the word 'curry' has become a core part of most of our culinary vocabulary. That's not 'wrong', but it's also worth us acknowledging that food can be a great lens to explore diverse cultures, and realising that language, native or created, plays a big part in how we perceive things. Just some food for thought (GREAT PUN). ~ Des Images from Unsplash
×
×
  • Create New...