Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'conclusion'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Categories

  • Articles
    • Forum Integration
    • Frontpage
  • Pages
  • Miscellaneous
    • Databases
    • Templates
    • Media

Forums

  • Cars
    • General Car Discussion
    • Tips and Resources
  • Aftermarket
    • Accessories
    • Performance and Tuning
    • Cosmetics
    • Maintenance & Repairs
    • Detailing
    • Tyres and Rims
    • In-Car-Entertainment
  • Car Brands
    • Japanese Talk
    • Conti Talk
    • Korean Talk
    • American Talk
    • Malaysian Talk
    • China Talk
  • General
    • Electric Cars
    • Motorsports
    • Meetups
    • Complaints
  • Sponsors
  • Non-Car Related
    • Lite & EZ
    • Makan Corner
    • Travel & Road Trips
    • Football Channel
    • Property Buzz
    • Investment & Financial Matters
  • MCF Forum Related
    • Official Announcements
    • Feedback & Suggestions
    • FAQ & Help
    • Testing

Blogs

  • MyAutoBlog

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Found 3 results

  1. http://umrresearch.com.au/doc/Singapore_Pr...May11_Final.pdf Short version - The gahmen had commissioned a pre-election study to gauge voter sentiment just before the GE. The study was carried out by an Australian private survey company. Results? 61% for P*P, 39% for Oppo (with a margin of error of +/-3.6% at 90% Confidence). Uncanny how they knew the results pretty much dead-on before any of us crossed a single voting slip, isn't it? To me the most interesting thing is the graphic on page 10 ("How voters feel about the parties"), showing that the WP essentially has the same "positive" rating (55%) as the P*P, but less "negative" rating. In other words, the WP was actually viewed as a *better* party on balance than the P*P. Well, well, well. If WP does very well in this term, there's some real hope for the next GE. But I think the best candidates from the other parties need to unite under the Hammer to stand a really good chance.
  2. Another piece of intriguing news from the AC family. Very happening these days... What's all the hush-hush about, I wonder? It's very clear cut. If there was no wrong-doing, why the sudden resignation?? People are not so stupid to be taken in by lame excuses of poor health, etc. Are they hoping that by delaying long enough, people will lose interest and forget?? No conclusion yet to ACS (I) saga By Satish Cheney | Posted: 09 October 2010 1943 hrs SINGAPORE: The saga involving Dr Ong Teck Chin, the former principal of Anglo-Chinese School (Independent), has been the talk of the town in the last few days. But for now and even next week, an outcome is unlikely, according to Mr Chandra Mohan from law firm Rajah and Tann, who is on the school's board of governors. It is believed that the board met on Saturday to look into a complaint against Dr Ong. It has been a tough time for Dr Ong. Two days after news broke about his sudden resignation as principal of ACS (I) and a complaint lodged against him, Dr Ong was brought by ambulance to hospital for breathing problems on Wednesday. Dr Ong, who had multiple bypass surgery two years ago, was discharged from the National University Hospital on Friday. It is believed that Dr Ong is back at his home at the ACS boarding house in Dover Road. When asked about the complaint against Dr Ong, former chairman of the ACS board of governors, Tan Wah Thong, said: "Let us be neutral and listen to both sides of the story." Dr Ong had been at the helm of ACS (I) since 1994 and under his watch, the school has grown to become one of the top educational institutions in Singapore. And Dr Ong has his fair share of supporters. In fact, some parents have even gone online to rally behind him. Original article here: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/sin...1086102/1/.html
  3. There are similiar incidents about 'grave mistake' that had happened before like the recent Nicholl Highway collapse. Drawing from that incident, the CEO of LTA had to leave and was 'transferred'!... but the MiniStar of Transport was not 'touched' then So taking from that cue, WKS also should not be touched..right? But the poll here is on the Director of ISD.... Should the Director of ISD be subjected to the same decision as the LTA incident?
×
×
  • Create New...