Search the Community

We wonder if these group of cyclists are aware that the COVID-19 pandemic is still ongoing when they ride in such a large group.. Posted by the people from SG Road Vigilante on 7th of Aug 2020 is a video of a large group of cyclist riding together seriously before a crash causes a chain collision of bicycles. Some of us might find the accident funny while some would be shocked at how dangerous riding on the road could be. We just hope that everyone recovers well from their fall. Of course, such a post will put netizens into a commenting frenzy where everyone will be slamming the cyclists for road-hogging and riding in a group of more than five. Do you feel that these large gatherings should be stopped? Or do you feel that more and more cyclists are taking advantage of our roads? Let us know...

its now 1st car claim 2nd, 2nd claim 3rd and so forth, please drive safe and keep safe distance. no more last pay all.

within minutes after a chain collison some stranger would stop their car can tell you that they are from ^&*%^$^ workshop and are here to help you. more than an eye isn't it ? i was involved in a similar situation months ago and the story was relate to fellow forumers of another car forum and we realise they are all ppl of the same workshop. lol such a coincident. anyone wana share their experience ?

What are the models and make that uses timing chains ?

Besides nissan sunny and hyundai sonata.. which other cars run on timing chain?

HELP! Was involved in a multi-vehicle accident Monday night. AMK Ave 6 at junction with Ave 5. Red light, bus and taxi stopped in front of me in leftmost lane. I stopped and was whacked from behind by a black Maserati going real fast. Power to carcam cut off so wasn't captured. Would appreciate it if any member who recorded the Maserati speeding can share the footage. Thanks. http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/4-injured-accident-involving-smrt-bus-and-4-cars-ang-mo-kio-ave-5 The Maserati is hidden from view by my car (silver Avante).

last car is malaysian registered car http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OickFMjIM-U

Let just say I happen to hear about an incident. First car fully stopped, second car fully stopped, third car couldn’t stop. Everyone came down, only bumper to bumper incident. 3rd car front have some damages, 2nd car rear & front some damages, 1st car suffer no damage. Since 1st car have no damages, agreed with the 2nd car’s owner and drove off. Then should the first car report to incident to the insurance where there is no damages, no details of the other 2 drivers. And how can the 2nd car insurance claim for the front damage? He need the VRN of the first car right which he has because due to onboard camera which may review footage later. Then when the 2nd car claim, will the insurance company have details of the first car? Will the first car owner get into trouble? So much for being a gentleman. If first car owner is worry because his current insurance company is one that will deny claims for non-drunkard drivers at their own discretion.

http://youtu.be/sye0pg-erXc Poor motorcyclists. Dunno who the front vehicle, wonder if he jam brake to take a look at the opposite direction accident.

Will you still eat? http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/10/01/ja...fukushima/print Tokyo (AFP)

The lorry driver must be dreaming or something else. Every vehicles stopped cos of red light and he just went ahead and cause chain collision........ Accident happen just now 03/09/13 at about 7.03am along the junction of Jalan Kayu & Fernvale Lane. The lorry never attemp to stop and no brakes lights..... I have the video captured on my FXD 700 but sorry, IT stuff very blurr, unable to upload video. Tried so many times just couldn't upload the video...

Still remember it first came to Singapore at The Heeren, was it 1997 or 1998?

Unfortunately, my car was involved in a chain collision with 2 other cars. Mine was the last. The good thing is nobody was hurt. I've been hearing 2 version of the how the claims would be apportioned. First: The last car will bear all Second: Each car will claim it's OWN damages from the car behind. A is first car, B is second car and C is the last A <-- B <-- C A will claim B for it's own damages. B will claim C for it's own damages. Which is true?

Guys, anyone know if this ride on timing chain or belt? And can run on Ron 92? Appreciate feedback

So unlucky. Involved in a chain collision accident. 4 cars involved. Mine was the second car from the front. Was raining heavily and the taxi infront of me was slowing down and i also slowed down to a complete stop. But all of sudden another taxi from behind knock my backside. My rear bumper and left rear lights gone. Boot also dented so now cannot open. For my front it looks as if the front bumper is slightly knocked and number plate bent. But the impact from behind pushed my car to kiss into the taxi infront with slight scratches on his back bumper. In fact the taxi driver(front) wanted to settle with me for $20 to $30 but i told him let's just take down particulars for the 4 cars. The last car behind(4th car) is a rather young chap. I am not sure what is his damages like as it was raining rather heavily at that point. But I can only guess that he knocked into the third car. In such situation what is my liability? I am going down to the workshop tomorrow for repair.

Hi Trying my luck here. Contacted a few local distributors but they dun sell retail. Any one knows any local shops or hardware stores sells? Or can lubricants/oils be shipped from amazon? Tks

ppl bang u from behind which caused u to end in ppl butt and goes on... who claim who?

Sometimes I feel scared reading such websites about the food we eat. Even live food also adulterated with chemicals. What is safe to eat anymore? No wonder people get cancer so easily nowadays. http://www.naturalnews.com/032659_arsenic_chicken.html (NaturalNews) After years of sweeping the issue under the rug and hoping no one would notice, the FDA has now finally admitted that chicken meat sold in the USA contains arsenic, a cancer-causing toxic chemical that's fatal in high doses. But the real story is where this arsenic comes from: It's added to the chicken feed on purpose! Even worse, the FDA says its own research shows that the arsenic added to the chicken feed ends up in the chicken meat where it is consumed by humans. So for the last sixty years, American consumers who eat conventional chicken have been swallowing arsenic, a known cancer-causing chemical. (http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/burlington_county_times_news/fd...) Until this new study, both the poultry industry and the FDA denied that arsenic fed to chickens ended up in their meat. The fairytale excuse story we've all been fed for sixty years is that "the arsenic is excreted in the chicken feces." There's no scientific basis for making such a claim... it's just what the poultry industry wanted everybody to believe. But now the evidence is so undeniable that the manufacturer of the chicken feed product known as Roxarsone has decided to pull the product off the shelves (http://www.grist.org/food-safety/2011-06-08-fda-admits-supermarket-ch...). And what's the name of this manufacturer that has been putting arsenic in the chicken feed for all these years? Pfizer, of course -- the very same company that makes vaccines containing chemical adjuvants that are injected into children. Technically, the company making the Roxarsone chicken feed is a subsidiary of Pfizer, called Alpharma LLC. Even though Alpharma now has agreed to pull this toxic feed chemical off the shelves in the United States, it says it won't necessarily remove it from feed products in other countries unless it is forced by regulators to do so. As reported by AP: "Scott Brown of Pfizer Animal Health's Veterinary Medicine Research and Development division said the company also sells the ingredient in about a dozen other countries. He said Pfizer is reaching out to regulatory authorities in those countries and will decide whether to sell it on an individual basis." (http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2011-06-08-fda-chicken-...) Arsenic? Eat more! But even as its arsenic-containing product is pulled off the shelves, the FDA continues its campaign of denial, claiming arsenic in chickens is at such a low level that it's still safe to eat. This is even as the FDA says arsenic is a carcinogen, meaning it increases the risk of cancer. The National Chicken Council agrees with the FDA. In a statement issued in response to the news that Roxarsone would be pulled from feed store shelves, it stated, "Chicken is safe to eat" even while admitting arsenic was used in many flocks grown and sold as chicken meat in the United States. What's astonishing about all this is that the FDA tells consumers it's safe to eat cancer-causing arsenic but it's dangerous to drink elderberry juice! The FDA recently conducted an armed raid in an elderberry juice manufacturer, accusing it of the "crime" of selling "unapproved drugs." (http://www.naturalnews.com/032631_elderberry_juice_FDA_raid.html) Which drugs would those be? The elderberry juice, explains the FDA. You see, the elderberry juice magically becomes a "drug" if you tell people how it can help support good health. The FDA has also gone after dozens of other companies for selling natural herbal products or nutritional products that enhance and support health. Plus, it's waging a war on raw milk which it says is dangerous. So now in America, we have a food and drug regulatory agency that says it's okay to eat arsenic, but dangerous to drink elderberry juice or raw milk. Eat more poison, in other words, but don't consume any healing foods. That's the FDA, killing off Americans one meal at a time while protecting the profits of the very companies that are poisoning us with their deadly ingredients. Oh, by the way, here's another sweet little disturbing fact you probably didn't know about hamburgers and conventional beef: Chicken litter containing arsenic is fed to cows in factory beef operations. So the arsenic that's pooped out by the chickens gets consumed and concentrated in the tissues of cows, which is then ground into hamburger to be consumed by the clueless masses who don't even know they're eating second-hand chicken sh*t. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027414_chicken_disease_cows. Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032659_arsenic_...l#ixzz1zXgiiBC4

Hi all, just to check with experts here, if you are involved in a chain collision. both your car and the car in front was stationary.A lorry rammed you from the back and you surge forward and knock into the car infront. will your ncd be affected? Thanks for the advice.

Hi guys :) I wanna know that if 2005 Honda Jazz ride is on a timing or chain belt? if it is on timing belt, roughly how much to get it changed? Coz was told by someone that 2005 model got 2 type. One model no need to change as it is on chain belt. So can someone enlightened me and tell me how to check if it is on timing or chain belt. Thank in advance! Regards

I think most of them did. Before the $10 boarder chain shops are here, most Sri dewas etc were only charging $7-8 per head. Now they follow the $10 barber shop, earning extra $2-3 doing the same thing ..... This is really win-win! At least this is what happened in my neighborhood

Hi all, quite curious about this issue. Those cars on belts, need to change belts, bearings, pump etc Those cars on chains, no need to change bearings and pumps meh??? Btw any bros driving Getz 1.3, my fil driving, like to know whether chain or belt? Many thanks

Source: http://news.omy.sg/News/Local%2BNews/Story...517-287227.html involves 1 mini lorry, 1 taxi and 3 sedans!

Hi dear forumers, I would appreciate whatever advice there is. Thanks in advance!! I was involved in a chain accident, which I am the last car out of 3 cars. What happened is that I rear-ended a Swift when we were moving slowly (around less than 20km/h) along ECP towards east side. The Swift's rear door was dented in, but there was not much damage to my car except for a slightly folded bonnet and cracked bumper. In front of this Swift was a Lancer, which had the rear bumper dented as well. It is not clear who banged into who first, but I was quite sure I had kept a safety distance from the Swift. The thing is, after I reported my accident to my insurance company, and wanted to claim from my company, it took them 7 days from the day I reported to check on my Driving License Date, and voided my insurance 7 days later, stating that I did not satisfy one of their criteria (minimum 2 years driving experience). Problem is, when I purchased their policy, there was no way I could enter my Driving License date! And now the Swift driver had her car repaired, and she tells me that I have to pay for the damage for the Lancer as well. And the damages are not cheap !!!! Amounting to $8000+++ including the rental fee of $120 per day. My questions are: 1. Can Fidrec help to at least ask my previous insurance company to honor at least partial of the claims? My insurance company is D*****A*** 2. Do I really have to pay for the damages to the Lancer? I found this BOLA from GIA link (see page 9) but I'm not sure since my insurance has been voided effectively during the accident. Anyone else in a similar position but still escaped paying for the first car's damages? 3. Is there any way to settle the charges with workshop without seeking approval from the Swift driver? She doesn't seem willing to let me settle with them. Any help rendered is greatly appreciated!!

Hi dear forumers, I would appreciate whatever advice there is. Thanks in advance!! I was involved in a chain accident, which I am the last car out of 3 cars. What happened is that I rear-ended a Swift when we were moving slowly (around less than 20km/h) along ECP towards east side. The Swift's rear door was dented in, but there was not much damage to my car except for a slightly folded bonnet and cracked bumper. In front of this Swift was a Lancer, which had the rear bumper dented as well. It is not clear who banged into who first, but I was quite sure I had kept a safety distance from the Swift. The thing is, after I reported my accident to my insurance company, and wanted to claim from my company, it took them 7 days from the day I reported to check on my Driving License Date, and voided my insurance 7 days later, stating that I did not satisfy one of their criteria (minimum 2 years driving experience). Problem is, when I purchased their policy, there was no way I could enter my Driving License date! And now the Swift driver had her car repaired, and she tells me that I have to pay for the damage for the Lancer as well. And the damages are not cheap !!!! Amounting to $8000+++ including the rental fee of $120 per day. My questions are: 1. Can Fidrec help to at least ask my previous insurance company to honor at least partial of the claims? My insurance company is D*****A*** 2. Do I really have to pay for the damages to the Lancer? I found this BOLA from GIA link (see page 9) but I'm not sure since my insurance has been voided effectively during the accident. Anyone else in a similar position but still escaped paying for the first car's damages? 3. Is there any way to settle the charges with workshop without seeking approval from the Swift driver? She doesn't seem willing to let me settle with them. Any help rendered is greatly appreciated!!