Genie47 1st Gear March 26, 2005 Share March 26, 2005 OK attached is the UOA report on Conoco Hydroclear Super All Season Diamond 5W30. For some strange reason, the Si levels have not gone down. I will be checking on the intake system. As long as this is not solved, the bearing wear is going to be there no matter how good the oil is. I'll be check out the grommets and all the possible areas where a leak will occur. As usual, anyone interested in Terry's comments just PM me. 87128_NGEE1_E140-35083-1642.pdf ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie47 1st Gear March 26, 2005 Author Share March 26, 2005 See BITOG link for ongoing discussion. http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultima...ic&f=3&t=002427 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kohks Neutral Newbie March 27, 2005 Share March 27, 2005 hi genie, so from the Fe and Sn number are quite high, when compared to cxxxxxe and RP, is it due to Conoco or it is just your car ? i was thinking of trying out Diamond but from the numbers it is not comforting to use. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie47 1st Gear March 27, 2005 Author Share March 27, 2005 As you can see, my Si number is high. It could be the abrasive action of the Si that caused the bearing wear (Sn). I've been consistently getting high Si numbers since RP. I have to investigate my intake. Then again, there is no moly in this oil. The wear might be lower if a dash of moly is present just like RP and cxxxxxe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie47 1st Gear March 27, 2005 Author Share March 27, 2005 I took out my plugs to check because someone got a hunch that it could be fuel additives. True enough, the plugs are coated with a thin layer of red-brown deposits. Signs of fuel additive usage. Now here is the problem. I have not been using fuel additives. Zilch. Been filling up with JB petrol. Mainly Caltex Gold RON97. I suspect they up the octane rating with additives. The not so healthy kind. It is getting into the oil and causing abnormal wear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Octopus 3rd Gear March 28, 2005 Share March 28, 2005 Oouh.....guess this means bad news for MCF'ers topping up petrol in JB? But could it be other problem which is causing the spark plug to get a 'red-brown' deposits? Maybe wrong heat range? Too rich fuel? etc? I wonder how's the petrol quality in S'pore..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackyv Turbocharged March 28, 2005 Share March 28, 2005 now i worry, i just bought 1 bottle of Conoco Hydroclear SAS diamond 5w30 from Project/MY yesterday.. i was thinking due to my driving style, good engine oil is a waste for my usage of less than 12K of milleage/year and i change oil every 6mths, so all i need is a good oil to last me around 5-6k of usage every 6mths... is this conoco good enough?... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie47 1st Gear March 28, 2005 Author Share March 28, 2005 Its actually good enough. Look at all the Ca, P and Zn. All these are antiwear additives. More than the RP or cxxxxxe but the only thing lacking is the Mo which is seen consistently in the RP and cxxxxxe. The problem I'm getting is the Si in my oil from the air which I am still trying to figure out where and the additives in the petrol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie47 1st Gear March 28, 2005 Author Share March 28, 2005 If it is too rich, it will be black. If it is too lean, you get white deposits. According to many, additives in fuel will give you red-brown to purple deposits. This does not harm spark plugs but prolonged usage will cause washout into the oil and these additives will attack the engine components. Now here is the deal. To prevent fuel washout which includes the additives you have too........use thicker engine oil. This might explain why the cxxxxxe 5W40 shows the least wear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackyv Turbocharged March 28, 2005 Share March 28, 2005 heng ah... actually, was thinking of RP($39) or conoco($35), which would u reco infact? maybe next round will try out RP.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie47 1st Gear March 28, 2005 Author Share March 28, 2005 For all intents and purposes, RP looks superior from my UOAs. cxxxxxe is good if you are looking for a 40wt oil. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King 1st Gear March 28, 2005 Share March 28, 2005 thank you bro for all the info. i buy you coffee next time we meet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamesgetz 4th Gear March 28, 2005 Share March 28, 2005 could the high levels of Si be due to sediments (sand, clay) in the JB petrol? have heard such crap can be found in petrol if the kiosk storage facility is not properly maintained... then again, shouldn't such crap be removed by the car fuel pump filter? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie47 1st Gear March 28, 2005 Author Share March 28, 2005 That is why I say it cannot be already in the petrol. The filter will take care of it. FYI, the RP and cxxxxxe still use SG petrol. Still get those Si in it. I'm pluggin all the leaks so to speak. Tightening every screw/nut whatever for the intake system. The additive thing seems quite true. Caltex in JB is either Silver or Gold. Silver is the red nozzle and is RON92. It is a leaded fuel and the nozzle cannot fit into the fuel port of my car. The only choice is Gold which is RON97. I think they are bumping up the octane number with fuel additives. Malaysians say that EssoMobil, Projet and Caltex got vroom. I guess it is the additives. The so called bo power petrol is Shell and Petronas. I will be switching to Shell regular to see how things fare. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maded Neutral Newbie March 28, 2005 Share March 28, 2005 no wonder u out huntin for a torque wrench? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elantrahatch Neutral Newbie March 29, 2005 Share March 29, 2005 Do keep us updated on JB's Shell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkLord 1st Gear March 29, 2005 Share March 29, 2005 This oil analysis thing is really interesting... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kohks Neutral Newbie March 29, 2005 Share March 29, 2005 been using JB Shell 97, so far fuel consumption seems to be marginally worse than Singapore Shell 98. but seems to be same as Singapore Shell 95 or Caltex 95. i think i will check my civic vti spark plugs later to confirm the condition. btw did your fuel consumption improved with conoco diamond? i think i will still go ahead with the diamond oil change next month. kohks ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Crash test results
Crash test results
A level results for University Courses
A level results for University Courses
O level results coming out soon!
O level results coming out soon!
Mileage 110k, Should use 5W30 or 5W40
Mileage 110k, Should use 5W30 or 5W40
5W30 or 5W40 Engine Oil Is Better For Your Car?
5W30 or 5W40 Engine Oil Is Better For Your Car?
5w30 vs 5w40
5w30 vs 5w40
PSLE Results coming out soon!
PSLE Results coming out soon!
2015 miss universe results fail!
2015 miss universe results fail!