Jump to content

If your fren wanna get the Asstrek Turbo R (kick ass mah...) ....


Super7
 Share

Recommended Posts

definitely drink like a fish..probably a whale...

 

imagine the same Evo engine matched to an auto transmission and so much more weight to haul around....= bad formula for fuel consumption...... [thumbsdown]

 

Does fish actually drink water ? [confused][dizzy][laugh][laugh]

 

Does it really make any different if one drive with light right foot and the car will still have high fuel consumption? 240bhp, probably only need half to drive in SG road [:/] and the rest in N-S highway [thumbsup]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, Airtrek Turbo's claimed 0-100kmh is 8.4 secs. Many G9 owners also claim the same timing. So maybe G9 is the answer after all!! haha.... [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

Uncle 7, seems like everyone also call you like that. Anyway, heard the consumption for the Airtrek Turbo R is quite high. So if you are accustomed to your camry consumption, than you are going to get a rude shock [dizzy]

 

UG

Link to post
Share on other sites

i also get a shock when i see some posted that their G9 or Sunny is consuming 8km/l [dizzy][dizzy]

 

How low can the fuel consumption that AirTrek turbo get??

Link to post
Share on other sites

G9 at 8.4???? OK, I'll ditch my babe for the G9 then...... [:p]

 

Actually, with 240 horses, a century sprint of 8.4 is rather disappointing. [thumbsdown] But then, if you look at this objectively, it's very good already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most manufacturerers exaggerate their 0-100 kmh claims anyway so kinda take all these century sprint figures wif a pinch of salt (esp ones that even exceed the manufacturer's claims....wah liao! [:p] ).

 

8.4 secs may sound "slow" on paper but it's actually pretty fast in the real world. [thumbsup]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, I do agree with you that 8.4 is pretty fast for a SUV. Maybe I expected more because they tagged is as a SUV with Evo engine. Fast but not seat pushing fast! [laugh][laugh][laugh] And with 240 horses, I sorta expected that when I testdrove it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've tested the AssTrek Turbo? Me too...... [:p]

 

Many of the AR guys couldn't bother about the Jap makes .... They seems to be only interested in Conti Cars.

 

The AssTrek is fast enough for an SUV... [thumbsup]

Edited by Selespeed156
Link to post
Share on other sites

Closest rival to the Airtrek is Subaru Forester Turbo. Styling may be less appealing to some (subjective) but perfomance very good and comfy too. Heard that the Airtrek TurboR drinks like a fish [furious] , something like 6 km per litre. [jawdrop]

 

yeah, i have also tested the Forestor Turbo:- the acceleration is good enuff for me (about 8 sec for 0-100, Airtrek about 7 sec...), the inteior feels more spacious, and it costs more than 10k less ......... but it has less features such as triptonic (not an very important issue with me btw), slightly less 'posh' interior (any way, both models are considered non luxurious cars), weaker showoff factor (ie without full body kit as the RalliArt for the Airtrek, muz admit i like to show off quite naturally).......

 

all in all, i rate the Forestor rather close to the Airtrek, except i somehow prefer the look of the Airtrek (more agressive with the body kit....)

 

cheers

Edited by Super7
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...