Vit4wd 1st Gear December 6, 2003 Share December 6, 2003 I pump Shell Fusion, which is 95 octane fr other petrol brand. Running 70% expressway and 30% rural, fuel consumption is abt 12km/l. You may want to try using 98 RON, which some claim gives better mileage. For me, My 2001 G9 Corolla 1.5 auto delivers nothing less than 13km/l based on 70/30 highway/city driving, using Caltex Gold 98 RON. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spider Neutral Newbie December 6, 2003 Share December 6, 2003 hi, my was 72K+ with free 500 vouncher from taka, 30000 link point (which can be exchange to $300 worth of suzuki acc), free alloy rim.... yes, + another 2 - 4k u can get a Altis....but do not want a common car... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vit4wd 1st Gear December 6, 2003 Share December 6, 2003 Suzuki spare parts are expensive. I had a my auto gear gearbox replaced with a re-con gearbox for S$3,000. A 1993 Honda Civic re-con gearbox in comparison, costs just S$2,000. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
E36UDM Neutral Newbie December 6, 2003 Share December 6, 2003 Welcome to MCF Do you drive one ? Anyway do join us for our weekly meetups on fridays Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopi_peng Neutral Newbie December 8, 2003 Share December 8, 2003 yeah, drive a 1.6 auto liana. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopi_peng Neutral Newbie December 8, 2003 Share December 8, 2003 wah!! that's very expensive!! re-con gearbox from where? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopi_peng Neutral Newbie December 8, 2003 Share December 8, 2003 (edited) I pump Shell Fusion, which is 95 octane fr other petrol brand. Running 70% expressway and 30% rural, fuel consumption is abt 12km/l. my friend's 1.3 manual is doing 12+km/L. not bad considering his is probably 30% highway amd have to pass thru the many traffic lights @ Sengkang/serangoon area everyday. Edited December 8, 2003 by Kopi_peng Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
E36UDM Neutral Newbie December 8, 2003 Share December 8, 2003 Ic join us for meetup lah Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Neutral Newbie December 9, 2003 Share December 9, 2003 i chose liana also because of the price. my 1.3 was about 70k one yr ago. now 65k can get liao. indeed the new interior is much better than the old one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Neutral Newbie December 9, 2003 Share December 9, 2003 Pro: quite spacious interior...... agree nice roundish exterior (5-dr). don like the 4-dr ..... i drive a 4 door probably the cheapest japanese hatch locally ...... yeap Con: wind noise, road noise, engine noise quite obvious ..... correct average to low fuel economy (1.6L auto doing 10-11km/L, 70(e'way)/30(urb)) ... 1.3 manual doing about 12-13km/l Price easily matched by the more popular Sunny or Corolla.... unlikely as people who look at liana are normally budget tight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Neutral Newbie December 9, 2003 Share December 9, 2003 i m on shell 95 also, with the same consumption as you. the recent formula seems to give better mileage. first three tanks were not obvious my forth tank gave me 10% more. tried 98 before, no change in mileage, just more power when pick up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Neutral Newbie December 9, 2003 Share December 9, 2003 your freebies a lot leh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Neutral Newbie December 9, 2003 Share December 9, 2003 Suzuki spare parts are expensive. I had a my auto gear gearbox replaced with a re-con gearbox for S$3,000. A 1993 Honda Civic re-con gearbox in comparison, costs just S$2,000. yeap suzuki parts are know to be high in cost, as if it is a sports car. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Neutral Newbie December 9, 2003 Share December 9, 2003 identified 3 liana-ers so far.... you (1.6 auto year??), spider (1.6 auto Jan 2004) and myself (1.3 manual 4 door) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopi_peng Neutral Newbie December 10, 2003 Share December 10, 2003 1.6 auto jan 2003! colleague driving a 1.3 Nov 02 oops! gotta renew insurance for new rd tax!!! sigh!! $$$ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Neutral Newbie December 11, 2003 Share December 11, 2003 so my car is the oldest...... i supposed yours is ntuc right? when i renewed mine, i paid sam amount but the coverage was dropped fm premium plus to premium. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spider Neutral Newbie December 12, 2003 Share December 12, 2003 (edited) Pro: quite spacious interior...... agree (1st reason why i bought Liana ) nice roundish exterior (5-dr). don like the 4-dr ..... i drive a 4 door (both ok for my wife and me, but we want the bigger boot) probably the cheapest japanese hatch locally ...... yeap (not sure, other hatch is look like original hatch, but Liana is like a mini-MVP to me) Con: wind noise, road noise, engine noise quite obvious ..... correct (i test drive Liana, Carens and Lancer on the same day, Liana is the lowest noise....Lancer the worst) average to low fuel economy (1.6L auto doing 10-11km/L, 70(e'way)/30(urb)) ... 1.3 manual doing about 12-13km/l (will see how's mine next month) Price easily matched by the more popular Sunny or Corolla.... unlikely as people who look at liana are normally budget tight. (agreed with smiley, I think Sunny or Corolla still more ex...Suzuki price is more competitive with Matrix). Edited December 12, 2003 by Spider Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super7 Turbocharged December 12, 2003 Share December 12, 2003 Good day, I m interested to know how is Suzuki Liana 1.3 and 1.6 manual performance. And what is the fuel consumption and is it reliable to buy or not..... Kindly provide ant data, thanks....... I am seriously contemplating getting this car to reaplce my COE AE101. I would go for the hatchback 1.6 auto, but most likely to settle for the 1.3M cause trying to minimise cost.... I feel that the hatch looks like a mini MPV...the sedan reminds me of the Toyota Echo, with it's high stance... This one looks kinda cool with the bodykit: hey, this morning i saw one like this on the road, it's all white... very chio and cool looking ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Fuel Pump
Fuel Pump
Can buy this new engine oil in Giant? $17.90
Can buy this new engine oil in Giant? $17.90
Truck casually carries van on S'pore expressway
Truck casually carries van on S'pore expressway
sgCarMart Reviews: Audi A6 Sedan Mild Hybrid 2.0 TFSI S tronic Design
sgCarMart Reviews: Audi A6 Sedan Mild Hybrid 2.0 TFSI S tronic Design
Swift Owners
Swift Owners
4th generation Suzuki Jimny coming in 2018.
4th generation Suzuki Jimny coming in 2018.
[Spyshots] 2023 Suzuki Jimny Long
[Spyshots] 2023 Suzuki Jimny Long
Suzuki New Car in Japan (Landy)
Suzuki New Car in Japan (Landy)