Jump to content

Parliament 2023


Jellandross
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 7/26/2023 at 3:07 PM, yishunite said:

Which one is the Dark Side?? 🤔

Bro, there is no dark side back side simi side

all are the same one

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
  • Haha! 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypersonic
On 7/26/2023 at 3:34 PM, Mustank said:

Bro, there is no dark side back side simi side

all are the same one

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which

天下乌鸦一般黑。

  • Haha! 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/26/2023 at 2:38 PM, Mustank said:

Balance in the force is really real

One guy from camp a kena, guy from camp b also tio

Tit for tat.

No good no good... 

 

On 7/26/2023 at 3:21 PM, Benarsenal said:

Ya lor

You have affair, I also have affair.

You sick, I also sick

:D

Like that WP very fast game over, cos 83 PAP vs 10 WP (before all the saga / resignation), a few more incident and WP no one left liao. :a-t2622:

  • Praise 1
  • Haha! 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged
On 7/26/2023 at 2:38 PM, Mustank said:

Balance in the force is really real

One guy from camp a kena, guy from camp b also tio

 

Balance is what kept the universe in existence for 13 billion years. Stars birth, stars death, white dwarfs, blackholes and god knows what else kept the forces in balance so that we have a universe that existed for that long.

Solar system, sun , earth, water, air, humans, etc, are all matters from the Universe. Obviously they all also inherit the concept of balance.  ,

The ancient Chinese already figured that out thousand years ago with the yin and yang concept and use that to anticipate occurrences and events.

So yes, balance in the force is real. 😁

  • Haha! 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on, there is no balance lah.

you think the person who had the video of WP mp touching hands is very recent. Im sure they had it a long time, only wanted to hold as long as they can and maybe use it during election. But who know that PAP have so many problems, so quickly release the video to distract and also lessen the damage of Government.

what timing for the release of the video. 

  • Haha! 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Moderator
On 7/25/2023 at 4:12 PM, Carbon82 said:

One more coming... Professional misconduct affects the credibility of a person, especially when he/she is a MP. 

Basket, I should have invested in Garrett popcorn! :a-bang:

July 31 court date set for MP Christopher de Souza’s professional disciplinary case

chris3.jpg

SINGAPORE – Lawyer and People’s Action Party MP Christopher de Souza will face the Court of Three Judges on July 31 in a hearing to decide the final outcome of professional disciplinary proceedings brought against him.

The court, which is the highest disciplinary body for the legal profession, has the power to disbar, suspend or fine a lawyer who is guilty of professional misconduct. The court can also clear a lawyer of such charges.

In 2022, Mr de Souza, who is the Deputy Speaker of Parliament and an MP for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC, was found guilty of a misconduct charge by an independent disciplinary tribunal.

The two-member tribunal said Mr de Souza had not made full and frank disclosure to the court when he was aware his client had breached an undertaking not to use documents seized in a search.

The tribunal said he helped his client in suppressing evidence by preparing and filing an affidavit that did not reveal the client had breached its undertaking.

The charge was one of five brought against him by the Law Society of Singapore in relation to his conduct while he was acting for Amber Compounding Pharmacy and Amber Laboratories; the four other charges were dismissed by the tribunal.

 

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/law-society-seeks-four-year-suspension-for-lawyer-and-mp-christopher-de-souza
 

lawyer also anti pap ah

  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

Mr de Souza, a partner at Lee & Lee. 
 

so what the do you think is going to happen

 

im applauded that Lee & Lee have such high standards 

Edited by Ctaiwee
  • Haha! 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/31/2023 at 3:33 PM, inlinesix said:

If lawyer disclosed the breach, would that be a breach of client confidentiality?

Go and read up the details of the case if you have not. It is not about disclosing the breach, but non disclosure of the breach in the affidavit is a professional misconduct. 

 

On 7/31/2023 at 5:30 PM, RadX said:

Nothing to see

lets move on

When I read the following paragraphs, I know de Souza will be fine as this is the type of TALENT our government need! 

But if someone else were to use the same tactics, it would be an outright POFMA case.

 

Mr Tan argued the affidavit did reveal that Amber had used the documents. The affidavit by Mr Samuel Sudesh Thaddeus, a representative from Amber, said he had reviewed the seized documents, came to the conclusion that criminal offences were committed and decided to lodge the reports, argued Mr Tan.

During the hearing, Justice Woo commented that the paragraph in question was not worded as clearly as Mr de Souza seemed to think.

The judge said: “I had to read paragraph 24 many times because it’s not as clear as he made it out to be. It’s the way of drafting. I hope your client learns something."

  • Praise 8
  • Shocked 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)
On 7/31/2023 at 8:50 PM, Carbon82 said:

Go and read up the details of the case if you have not. It is not about disclosing the breach, but non disclosure of the breach in the affidavit is a professional misconduct. 

I have read up on the case.  That's why I ask

"If lawyer disclosed the breach, would that be a breach of client confidentiality?"

Disclose => Sue by Client

Non-disclosure => Sue by Law Society.

Same same but different.

 

Edited by inlinesix
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/31/2023 at 10:00 PM, yishunite said:

Court order the search. He was responsible for handling the document with strict instruction documents cannot be use for any other purpose

Unless he is those mafia type lawyer who is also a criminal thats a very dumb thing to do. Trying to defy court order can be disbarred

Does he know before he took over the case?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/31/2023 at 10:09 PM, yishunite said:

According to his own defence yes

According to his own defence, he had been advising the client to disclose.

The client did not disclose to the court.

Of course, you will say DeSouza should disclose it to the court.

If DeSouza disclose this to the court, would it violate client confidentiality?

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...