Jump to content

Let's get E - Motional...

therock

By therock,
in General Car Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

bsswan

bsswan

6th Gear
1 hour ago, kobayashiGT said:

Will grab driver and car sharing gonna get replaced?  

In the end yes, and they are already trialing this in the US, though with issues. A few months ago I did read the story of an auto-taxi doing a runner from the police with a passenger inside. Uber/Amazon/Google/Whoever did manage to explain it away.

A week or two there was another commentary explaining why self-driving cars will take much longer to arrive than we think. There are, currently, just too many problems to solve. I don't mind self-driving cars taking much longer but I am okay with auto-pilot on highways (only) with LIDAR and Lane Departure tech that runs on more simple processes.

 

26 minutes ago, therock said:

I really hope the AI is smart enough to catch kids randomly running across the road 😅 

This is just one major drawback of the AI....... save the child or save the passenger whom, technically, is likely the vehicle's owner and in charge of its AI. If it's one passenger and 10-bystanders at a bus stop, then what? Save ten and kill one, despite the one being the AI's owner? We know "the one" would self-preserve, it's a human reaction but then you put the decision in an artificial car brain.

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
13177

13177

Hypersonic
36 minutes ago, Watwheels said:

I think the range of the driverless car will be quite low because of the cameras, sensors and computers it has to power. Fully autonomous level...I have still doubts on it. Imagine the robot's AI have to be close to that of a human driver or better. It is even more difficult when lives of other drivers and pedestrians are at stake. 

Even cars with people driving it also can get into accidents. Such driverless car i dont really trust them.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Watwheels

Watwheels

Supersonic
2 minutes ago, 13177 said:

Even cars with people driving it also can get into accidents. Such driverless car i dont really trust them.

Yeah. It is difficult to trust a machine when you are not in control.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sdf4786k

Sdf4786k

Twincharged
(edited)
13 hours ago, Sosaria said:

But... but.... but.... our universities top world-rankings leh. 

Yeah lor .. being best gets you a paper document when you pass.

It’s after you get in the front door n produce results is where the good life starts and your peers with uptron tuition center certs becomes your boss boss..

we are good and hardworking..

but the real money goes to those that hardly work .. one of the many wonders of the universe 

the same can be said by the cows if they can speak .. provide milk provide beef provide leather provide glue yet hardly worth promoting to farmer status

Edited by Sdf4786k
Link to post
Share on other sites
13177

13177

Hypersonic
2 hours ago, Watwheels said:

Yeah. It is difficult to trust a machine when you are not in control.

Ya, like i said, even when a human is in control of the machine also cannot be trusted.

  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
inlinesix

inlinesix

Hypersonic
3 hours ago, 13177 said:

Even cars with people driving it also can get into accidents. Such driverless car i dont really trust them.

Driverless cars are safer than human.

Robot follows rules. No emotion involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Soya

Soya

Supersonic
49 minutes ago, inlinesix said:

Driverless cars are safer than human.

Robot follows rules. No emotion involved.

Liddat Sg Road Vigilante got no more walaa walaa BBQ le to see....

Where's the fun in that?

 

  • Haha! 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
inlinesix

inlinesix

Hypersonic
30 minutes ago, Soya said:

Liddat Sg Road Vigilante got no more walaa walaa BBQ le to see....

Where's the fun in that?

Most of times, i like to watch XMM on tiktok.

  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
kobayashiGT

kobayashiGT

Internal Moderator
6 hours ago, bsswan said:

In the end yes, and they are already trialing this in the US, though with issues. A few months ago I did read the story of an auto-taxi doing a runner from the police with a passenger inside. Uber/Amazon/Google/Whoever did manage to explain it away.

A week or two there was another commentary explaining why self-driving cars will take much longer to arrive than we think. There are, currently, just too many problems to solve. I don't mind self-driving cars taking much longer but I am okay with auto-pilot on highways (only) with LIDAR and Lane Departure tech that runs on more simple processes.

 

This is just one major drawback of the AI....... save the child or save the passenger whom, technically, is likely the vehicle's owner and in charge of its AI. If it's one passenger and 10-bystanders at a bus stop, then what? Save ten and kill one, despite the one being the AI's owner? We know "the one" would self-preserve, it's a human reaction but then you put the decision in an artificial car brain.

I think the process will get slow down abit. 

Elon musk busying playing with twitter now. Hhahaha. gotta let that sink in. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Benarsenal

Benarsenal

Turbocharged

If you drive a car with those fancy new driver assistance systems (radar cruise control, collision assist etc), you will know that when heavy rain (which happens regularly in Singapore) the sensors in the system often don't work.

So unless they can fix that for full driverless tech, I don't think we will see them in SG yet.

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...