Another mother of all siaolang thread

[Vratenza]

  On 7/10/2022 at 2:01 AM, Soya said:

Abang polis will tell u point finger, do stoopid acts dun kacau them la. Take out baseball bat from boot n settle among yourselves....

Expand  

... Not before asking you to pay a "fine" in cash on the spot.

"Social Unrest Fine.... 50sgd can settle bang.." 

[Fitvip]

  On 7/9/2022 at 4:56 AM, Playtime said:

amid all the celebration in PRC internet, someone posted the same there too wrt to Xi... deleted very fast. 

Expand  

Is it the one that caused Fish Leong's song to be banned? For nothing Fish Leong becomes the victim.

Edited July 10, 2022 by Fitvip

[Playtime]

  On 7/10/2022 at 3:25 AM, Fitvip said:

Is it the one that caused Fish Leong's song to be banned? For nothing Fish Leong becomes the victim.

Expand  

she must be thinking boh tai boh chee what happen to my song🤣? why so many hate mail? 

[Fitvip]

  On 7/10/2022 at 5:14 AM, Playtime said:

she must be thinking boh tai boh chee what happen to my song🤣? why so many hate mail? 

Expand  

Innocent victim.

[Kxbc]

  On 7/10/2022 at 5:14 AM, Playtime said:

she must be thinking boh tai boh chee what happen to my song🤣? why so many hate mail? 

Expand  

Maybe she said "what the fish!". 

 

🤣

[Windwaver]

Just came across this 

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/jail-caning-for-two-men-who-molested-grab-driver-while-the-victim-was-driving-them-home

Jail, caning for two men who molested Grab driver while victim was driving them home

SINGAPORE - After a night of merrymaking, two friends boarded a private-hire car and ended up molesting the male driver.

During the trial, the Grab driver, 28, who cannot be named due to a gag order to protect his identity, told the court that during the ride, his two passengers - Neo Wei Meng and Goh Suet Hong - also directed several inappropriate comments at him.

The victim testified that the men had told him that they found him cute and that “God had sent them to pleasure him”.

They also told the victim that “they were women disguised as men”, the court heard.

On Thursday (July 7), Goh, 40, was sentenced to a year’s jail with two strokes of the cane, while Neo, 41, was sentenced to 14 months’ jail with three strokes of the cane.

Magistrate Hairul Hakkim Kuthibutheen, who had earlier convicted each offender of one count of molestation after a trial, said that unlike Goh’s charge, Neo’s involved direct skin-to-skin contact with the victim’s private parts.

Before handing down the sentences on Thursday, the magistrate said the victim had gone through a harrowing ordeal in which he was repeatedly and mercilessly molested by the pair.

Magistrate Hairul said that the incident left an indelible mark on the victim, adding that the man still feels traumatised and is unable to face strangers.

He said that the victim, who now does food delivery, cannot face customers, and when he does, he will run away after handing over the food.

The magistrate added that the pair had committed group sexual assault on a public transport worker while the man was driving and this posed a safety hazard to the victim, as well as other road users.

Deputy Public Prosecutor David Menon earlier stated in his submissions that before boarding the victim’s car, Goh and Neo had gone to a nightspot called Ebar in Neil Road on the evening of Nov 11, 2018. They then consumed alcoholic drinks.

In the wee hours of the next day, Neo made a vehicle booking on Grab.

The DPP said: “When they boarded the victim’s car, they were feeling the effects of the alcohol they had rapidly consumed and their inhibitions were lowered.

“Both Neo and Goh sat in the rear seat when they entered the victim’s car. The prosecution’s case is that Goh sat directly behind the victim, while Neo sat in the middle of the rear passenger seat.”

The court heard that the man was driving along the Central Expressway towards his first stop, Neo’s address in Hougang, when Goh used his right hand to reach over the victim’s right shoulder and across the victim’s chest.

Goh then touched the victim’s chest, the court heard.

The DPP said that at the same time, Neo leaned forward and touched the victim’s genitals.

According to the prosecution, at some point, the two offenders switched their actions.

DPP Menon told the court: “The victim did not consent to any of this contact. In fact, he repeatedly testified that he told Neo and Goh to stop on multiple occasions. They ignored him.”

Neo left the car when they reached his destination in Hougang.

Goh then moved to the front passenger seat, the court heard, and the victim began driving towards his address in Punggol.

The DPP said: “Almost immediately after they had set off for Punggol from Hougang, Goh kissed the victim on his left cheek and on his lips.  Goh also rubbed the victim’s (genitals). The victim did not consent to this contact.”

Once they arrived in Punggol, Goh instructed the victim to enter a multi-storey carpark. He then told the victim to wait for him after he alighted from the car to relieve himself.

Instead, the driver seized the opportunity to leave the scene.

He drove to Punggol Neighbourhood Police Centre, where he filed a police report.

The court heard that the victim did not shout for help earlier as he was afraid that his two passengers might attack him if he did so.

The DPP said: "The victim did not flee the scene in Hougang because he needed to complete the trip to avoid being suspended by Grab. At the time, Grab was his only source of income.

"Similarly, the victim did not terminate the trip early because if he did not complete the trip, his Grab account would be suspended."

The DPP said that Neo’s defence was that of bare denial. He told the magistrate: “(Neo claimed) he got into the victim’s car and promptly fell asleep, waking up only when nearing his house... The victim... testified that neither Goh nor Neo slept during the trip.”

DPP Menon added: “The victim’s testimony should be given full credit. He wasted no time in reporting the offences at Punggol Neighbourhood Police Centre when they were fresh in his mind. He has no reason to lie or to falsely implicate either Neo or Goh.”

Goh and Neo were represented by lawyer Kalaithasan Karuppaya from Regent Law.

On Thursday, Mr Kalaithasan told the court that the offenders intend to appeal against their convictions and sentences.

For molestation, an offender can be jailed for up to two years, fined, caned or receive any combination of such punishments.

[Victor68]

  On 7/9/2022 at 10:14 AM, Playtime said:

 

Lotsa questions. 

The lady attacking the car,  the man pointing middle finger,  consider as road rage can let police take action?

Once enter Malaysia... what happens in Malaysia stays in Malaysia?

Expand  

It is an unfortunate incident where both parties over reacted. Of course the behavior or that lady is just atrocious. If you remember the incident in front of the school where that big car moves forward with the security standing in front, you know you cannot do that too.

[Playtime]

  On 7/12/2022 at 11:30 PM, Victor68 said:

It is an unfortunate incident where both parties over reacted. Of course the behavior or that lady is just atrocious. If you remember the incident in front of the school where that big car moves forward with the security standing in front, you know you cannot do that too.

Expand  

But if this happened in say toa payoh or ang mo kio... 

Would the woman be charged with road rage? Or police would just take statement and ask make magistrate complain. She physically attacked the car after all.

The driver driving and pushing her is another matter. 

[Watwheels]

  On 7/12/2022 at 2:47 AM, Windwaver said:

Just came across this 

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/jail-caning-for-two-men-who-molested-grab-driver-while-the-victim-was-driving-them-home

Jail, caning for two men who molested Grab driver while victim was driving them home

SINGAPORE - After a night of merrymaking, two friends boarded a private-hire car and ended up molesting the male driver.

During the trial, the Grab driver, 28, who cannot be named due to a gag order to protect his identity, told the court that during the ride, his two passengers - Neo Wei Meng and Goh Suet Hong - also directed several inappropriate comments at him.

The victim testified that the men had told him that they found him cute and that “God had sent them to pleasure him”.

They also told the victim that “they were women disguised as men”, the court heard.

On Thursday (July 7), Goh, 40, was sentenced to a year’s jail with two strokes of the cane, while Neo, 41, was sentenced to 14 months’ jail with three strokes of the cane.

Magistrate Hairul Hakkim Kuthibutheen, who had earlier convicted each offender of one count of molestation after a trial, said that unlike Goh’s charge, Neo’s involved direct skin-to-skin contact with the victim’s private parts.

Before handing down the sentences on Thursday, the magistrate said the victim had gone through a harrowing ordeal in which he was repeatedly and mercilessly molested by the pair.

Magistrate Hairul said that the incident left an indelible mark on the victim, adding that the man still feels traumatised and is unable to face strangers.

He said that the victim, who now does food delivery, cannot face customers, and when he does, he will run away after handing over the food.

The magistrate added that the pair had committed group sexual assault on a public transport worker while the man was driving and this posed a safety hazard to the victim, as well as other road users.

Deputy Public Prosecutor David Menon earlier stated in his submissions that before boarding the victim’s car, Goh and Neo had gone to a nightspot called Ebar in Neil Road on the evening of Nov 11, 2018. They then consumed alcoholic drinks.

In the wee hours of the next day, Neo made a vehicle booking on Grab.

The DPP said: “When they boarded the victim’s car, they were feeling the effects of the alcohol they had rapidly consumed and their inhibitions were lowered.

“Both Neo and Goh sat in the rear seat when they entered the victim’s car. The prosecution’s case is that Goh sat directly behind the victim, while Neo sat in the middle of the rear passenger seat.”

The court heard that the man was driving along the Central Expressway towards his first stop, Neo’s address in Hougang, when Goh used his right hand to reach over the victim’s right shoulder and across the victim’s chest.

Goh then touched the victim’s chest, the court heard.

The DPP said that at the same time, Neo leaned forward and touched the victim’s genitals.

According to the prosecution, at some point, the two offenders switched their actions.

DPP Menon told the court: “The victim did not consent to any of this contact. In fact, he repeatedly testified that he told Neo and Goh to stop on multiple occasions. They ignored him.”

Neo left the car when they reached his destination in Hougang.

Goh then moved to the front passenger seat, the court heard, and the victim began driving towards his address in Punggol.

The DPP said: “Almost immediately after they had set off for Punggol from Hougang, Goh kissed the victim on his left cheek and on his lips.  Goh also rubbed the victim’s (genitals). The victim did not consent to this contact.”

Once they arrived in Punggol, Goh instructed the victim to enter a multi-storey carpark. He then told the victim to wait for him after he alighted from the car to relieve himself.

Instead, the driver seized the opportunity to leave the scene.

He drove to Punggol Neighbourhood Police Centre, where he filed a police report.

The court heard that the victim did not shout for help earlier as he was afraid that his two passengers might attack him if he did so.

The DPP said: "The victim did not flee the scene in Hougang because he needed to complete the trip to avoid being suspended by Grab. At the time, Grab was his only source of income.

"Similarly, the victim did not terminate the trip early because if he did not complete the trip, his Grab account would be suspended."

The DPP said that Neo’s defence was that of bare denial. He told the magistrate: “(Neo claimed) he got into the victim’s car and promptly fell asleep, waking up only when nearing his house... The victim... testified that neither Goh nor Neo slept during the trip.”

DPP Menon added: “The victim’s testimony should be given full credit. He wasted no time in reporting the offences at Punggol Neighbourhood Police Centre when they were fresh in his mind. He has no reason to lie or to falsely implicate either Neo or Goh.”

Goh and Neo were represented by lawyer Kalaithasan Karuppaya from Regent Law.

On Thursday, Mr Kalaithasan told the court that the offenders intend to appeal against their convictions and sentences.

For molestation, an offender can be jailed for up to two years, fined, caned or receive any combination of such punishments.

Expand  

Grosssss.

“God had sent them to pleasure him”.

“they were women disguised as men”

Neo’s involved direct skin-to-skin contact with the victim’s private parts.

 

See lah. Still want to abolish penal code 377a or not?

According to Section 377A of the Penal Code, any man who commits any act of gross indecency with another man in public or in private can be jailed for up to two years. This extends to any man who abets such an act, procures or attempts to procure such an act.28 Feb 2022

Edited July 13, 2022 by Watwheels

[Windwaver]

  On 7/13/2022 at 12:56 AM, Watwheels said:

Grosssss.

“God had sent them to pleasure him”.

“they were women disguised as men”

Neo’s involved direct skin-to-skin contact with the victim’s private parts.

 

See lah. Still want to abolish penal code 377a or not?

According to Section 377A of the Penal Code, any man who commits any act of gross indecency with another man in public or in private can be jailed for up to two years. This extends to any man who abets such an act, procures or attempts to procure such an act.28 Feb 2022

Expand  

[Windwaver]

Now police very busy 

https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/father-primary-school-kids-running-tampines-walkway-roof-files-police-report-over-video

Father of primary school kids running on Tampines walkway roof files police report over video

Over the weekend, a video of a group of children running atop a pedestrian walkway roof in Tampines went viral on Facebook, drawing flak from some netizens criticising the children for endangering the safety of others around them.

In the video, the six children, who donned school uniforms, could be seen running along the roof, throwing what looked like floorball sticks and other objects at each other on Friday, July 8.

While some viewers dismissed their actions that it was just some harmless childish antics, others criticised the children for acting dangerously. There were also those who blamed the parents for not taking proper care of their children. 

Angered by the comments, the father of two of the children, Jasper Gan, told AsiaOne that he has since made a police report on July 10 regarding the incident and he wants the authorities to ask the person who took that video to remove that video post. 

Gan also said in that report that he has that person's contact number.

In the report which Gan shared with us, he said that the Facebook post is "spreading false information" that the children are playing dangerously and that the shelter may fall apart.

The police has confirmed that a report was lodged. 

The 35-year-old told AsiaOne that it was all a misunderstanding and the children had climbed onto the roof to retrieve personal items that had gotten stuck in a tree. 

In the report, Gan said that Facebook post has garnered many negative comments from netizens and he is concerned that both his kids may feel "depressed" after reading the comments, fearing that they will be harassed too. 

Speaking to AsiaOne, Gan said that the incident has negatively affected his kids. 

"My daughter has Facebook, she read the comments. Negative people commented that they will chop [the children's] legs."

In fact, his children have been so affected that they feel the need to put on a disguise so that members of the public won't recognise them. 

"My child even asked me if she should wear sunglasses before she goes out because people are looking at her," he elaborated. "If they are an adult, they would know how to settle it, but they are children." 

He explained that on that date of the incident, the children — which consisted of his son, 10, daughter, 12, and his daughter's four friends — had been playing with a ball, which got stuck in a tree nearby the pedestrian walkway. 

The children then attempted to use another ball to knock it out, but this got stuck in the tree too. After which, they tried to fish both balls out of the tree with a badminton racket, which got stuck alongside the balls. 

As they were determined to get the items out of the tree, one child returned home to get some sticks to dislodge the items.

While the child was away, four kids decided to climb onto the roof of the pedestrian walkway, including Gan's children. 

When the child returned with the sticks, some of the kids attempted to throw the sticks to those at the roof to retrieve the items. This was unsuccessful and the children eventually climbed down from the top of the roof. 

Gan said that a member of the public made a police report after seeing those children on the roof.

The police then spoke with Gan's son who was told that the town council will help to remove the ball and others items from the tree the next day. 

None of the children's parents were present throughout the incident and Gan also added that this was not the first time children have climbed up onto the walkway's roof. 

While Gan emphasised that while he does not think it is right for the children to be on the roof, he said he can understand why they climbed up there in the first place. 

"Whether it is fine or not, it's how the children process it. The ball was stuck, they were finding ways to remove the ball." 

However, he reiterated that the way the story was portrayed is inaccurate and if his children had really been playing on the roof, he "would personally have scolded them".

He also added that if he had been there himself, he would have retrieved the ball himself for them so they wouldn't have to climb onto the roof. 

"The fact is that they were not playing on the roof, they were retrieving two balls."

Gan also said that the negative comments on the video have made the situation worse and that if children had not read the comments he would be "less concerned". 

"What if my kids commit suicide because of all these negative comments?" he said. 

[Watwheels]

  On 7/13/2022 at 1:19 AM, Windwaver said:

Now police very busy 

https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/father-primary-school-kids-running-tampines-walkway-roof-files-police-report-over-video

Father of primary school kids running on Tampines walkway roof files police report over video

Over the weekend, a video of a group of children running atop a pedestrian walkway roof in Tampines went viral on Facebook, drawing flak from some netizens criticising the children for endangering the safety of others around them.

In the video, the six children, who donned school uniforms, could be seen running along the roof, throwing what looked like floorball sticks and other objects at each other on Friday, July 8.

While some viewers dismissed their actions that it was just some harmless childish antics, others criticised the children for acting dangerously. There were also those who blamed the parents for not taking proper care of their children. 

Angered by the comments, the father of two of the children, Jasper Gan, told AsiaOne that he has since made a police report on July 10 regarding the incident and he wants the authorities to ask the person who took that video to remove that video post. 

Gan also said in that report that he has that person's contact number.

In the report which Gan shared with us, he said that the Facebook post is "spreading false information" that the children are playing dangerously and that the shelter may fall apart.

The police has confirmed that a report was lodged. 

The 35-year-old told AsiaOne that it was all a misunderstanding and the children had climbed onto the roof to retrieve personal items that had gotten stuck in a tree. 

In the report, Gan said that Facebook post has garnered many negative comments from netizens and he is concerned that both his kids may feel "depressed" after reading the comments, fearing that they will be harassed too. 

Speaking to AsiaOne, Gan said that the incident has negatively affected his kids. 

"My daughter has Facebook, she read the comments. Negative people commented that they will chop [the children's] legs."

In fact, his children have been so affected that they feel the need to put on a disguise so that members of the public won't recognise them. 

"My child even asked me if she should wear sunglasses before she goes out because people are looking at her," he elaborated. "If they are an adult, they would know how to settle it, but they are children." 

He explained that on that date of the incident, the children — which consisted of his son, 10, daughter, 12, and his daughter's four friends — had been playing with a ball, which got stuck in a tree nearby the pedestrian walkway. 

The children then attempted to use another ball to knock it out, but this got stuck in the tree too. After which, they tried to fish both balls out of the tree with a badminton racket, which got stuck alongside the balls. 

As they were determined to get the items out of the tree, one child returned home to get some sticks to dislodge the items.

While the child was away, four kids decided to climb onto the roof of the pedestrian walkway, including Gan's children. 

When the child returned with the sticks, some of the kids attempted to throw the sticks to those at the roof to retrieve the items. This was unsuccessful and the children eventually climbed down from the top of the roof. 

Gan said that a member of the public made a police report after seeing those children on the roof.

The police then spoke with Gan's son who was told that the town council will help to remove the ball and others items from the tree the next day. 

None of the children's parents were present throughout the incident and Gan also added that this was not the first time children have climbed up onto the walkway's roof. 

While Gan emphasised that while he does not think it is right for the children to be on the roof, he said he can understand why they climbed up there in the first place. 

"Whether it is fine or not, it's how the children process it. The ball was stuck, they were finding ways to remove the ball." 

However, he reiterated that the way the story was portrayed is inaccurate and if his children had really been playing on the roof, he "would personally have scolded them".

He also added that if he had been there himself, he would have retrieved the ball himself for them so they wouldn't have to climb onto the roof. 

"The fact is that they were not playing on the roof, they were retrieving two balls."

Gan also said that the negative comments on the video have made the situation worse and that if children had not read the comments he would be "less concerned". 

"What if my kids commit suicide because of all these negative comments?" he said. 

Expand  

"My daughter has Facebook, she read the comments. Negative people commented that they will chop [the children's] legs."

These ppl need to see a psychologist or check into IMH. FB now is mostly used by boomers?

[Windwaver]

  On 7/12/2022 at 11:30 PM, Victor68 said:

It is an unfortunate incident where both parties over reacted. Of course the behavior or that lady is just atrocious. If you remember the incident in front of the school where that big car moves forward with the security standing in front, you know you cannot do that too.

Expand  

 

  On 7/13/2022 at 12:22 AM, Playtime said:

But if this happened in say toa payoh or ang mo kio... 

Would the woman be charged with road rage? Or police would just take statement and ask make magistrate complain. She physically attacked the car after all.

The driver driving and pushing her is another matter. 

Expand  

https://malaysia.news.yahoo.com/johor-cops-identify-suspects-second-075304932.html

Johor cops identify suspects in Second Link road rage incident

ISKANDAR PUTERI, July 12 — Police have identified the two Singaporean suspects wanted in the case of alleged mischief, involving a Toyota Alphard multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) and a Kia sedan near the Sultan Abu Bakar Building’s Customs, Immigration and Quarantine (CIQ) Complex in Tanjung Kupang here last Saturday.

Iskandar Puteri police chief Assistant Commissioner Rahmat Ariffin said the two suspects are currently in Singapore.

“Police have identified the suspects and it is believed that both have returned to Singapore.

“We will cooperate with the Singapore Police Force (SPF) that will be assisting in tracking down the suspects,” said Rahmat when contacted by the media today.

He was responding to follow-up investigations involving the two suspects under Section 427 of the Penal Code, which states that those guilty of mischief and cause loss or damage to the amount of RM25 (S$7.90) or upwards could be jailed up to two years and fined.

He also confirmed that police have also received statements from the victims who are Singaporeans.

Rahmat said in a statement on Sunday that the road-rage incident was believed to have occurred when the victim’s vehicle collided with the car driven by the two suspects.

In the incident on Saturday, the victim who was driving in a Toyota Alphard had changed lanes to the right and collided with a Kia sedan.

The male suspect had stopped his vehicle where a man and a woman had also alighted from the sedan.

“The male suspect then shouted and gestured vulgarities towards the victim, while the female suspect went on to remove victim’s car plate and threw it on the victim’s windshield.

“Meanwhile, the female suspect removed the registration number of the victim’s car and threw the registration number towards the windscreen of the victim’s car,” he said.

Prior to that, Tular on social media displayed a 2.06 -minute video regarding the incident.

The police said the Toyota driver and passengers did not suffer any injuries and there was little damage to their car.

The case is being investigated under Section 427 of the Penal Code for committing mischief.

[Windwaver]

  On 7/13/2022 at 1:23 AM, Watwheels said:

"My daughter has Facebook, she read the comments. Negative people commented that they will chop [the children's] legs."

These ppl need to see a psychologist or check into IMH. FB now is mostly used by boomers?

Expand  

Internet is like that, can ignore 

[Windwaver]

 

[Windwaver]

[Windwaver]

While in China 

 

[Vratenza]

  On 7/13/2022 at 1:19 AM, Windwaver said:

Now police very busy 

https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/father-primary-school-kids-running-tampines-walkway-roof-files-police-report-over-video

Father of primary school kids running on Tampines walkway roof files police report over video

Over the weekend, a video of a group of children running atop a pedestrian walkway roof in Tampines went viral on Facebook, drawing flak from some netizens criticising the children for endangering the safety of others around them.

In the video, the six children, who donned school uniforms, could be seen running along the roof, throwing what looked like floorball sticks and other objects at each other on Friday, July 8.

While some viewers dismissed their actions that it was just some harmless childish antics, others criticised the children for acting dangerously. There were also those who blamed the parents for not taking proper care of their children. 

Angered by the comments, the father of two of the children, Jasper Gan, told AsiaOne that he has since made a police report on July 10 regarding the incident and he wants the authorities to ask the person who took that video to remove that video post. 

Gan also said in that report that he has that person's contact number.

In the report which Gan shared with us, he said that the Facebook post is "spreading false information" that the children are playing dangerously and that the shelter may fall apart.

The police has confirmed that a report was lodged. 

The 35-year-old told AsiaOne that it was all a misunderstanding and the children had climbed onto the roof to retrieve personal items that had gotten stuck in a tree. 

In the report, Gan said that Facebook post has garnered many negative comments from netizens and he is concerned that both his kids may feel "depressed" after reading the comments, fearing that they will be harassed too. 

Speaking to AsiaOne, Gan said that the incident has negatively affected his kids. 

"My daughter has Facebook, she read the comments. Negative people commented that they will chop [the children's] legs."

In fact, his children have been so affected that they feel the need to put on a disguise so that members of the public won't recognise them. 

"My child even asked me if she should wear sunglasses before she goes out because people are looking at her," he elaborated. "If they are an adult, they would know how to settle it, but they are children." 

He explained that on that date of the incident, the children — which consisted of his son, 10, daughter, 12, and his daughter's four friends — had been playing with a ball, which got stuck in a tree nearby the pedestrian walkway. 

The children then attempted to use another ball to knock it out, but this got stuck in the tree too. After which, they tried to fish both balls out of the tree with a badminton racket, which got stuck alongside the balls. 

As they were determined to get the items out of the tree, one child returned home to get some sticks to dislodge the items.

While the child was away, four kids decided to climb onto the roof of the pedestrian walkway, including Gan's children. 

When the child returned with the sticks, some of the kids attempted to throw the sticks to those at the roof to retrieve the items. This was unsuccessful and the children eventually climbed down from the top of the roof. 

Gan said that a member of the public made a police report after seeing those children on the roof.

The police then spoke with Gan's son who was told that the town council will help to remove the ball and others items from the tree the next day. 

None of the children's parents were present throughout the incident and Gan also added that this was not the first time children have climbed up onto the walkway's roof. 

While Gan emphasised that while he does not think it is right for the children to be on the roof, he said he can understand why they climbed up there in the first place. 

"Whether it is fine or not, it's how the children process it. The ball was stuck, they were finding ways to remove the ball." 

However, he reiterated that the way the story was portrayed is inaccurate and if his children had really been playing on the roof, he "would personally have scolded them".

He also added that if he had been there himself, he would have retrieved the ball himself for them so they wouldn't have to climb onto the roof. 

"The fact is that they were not playing on the roof, they were retrieving two balls."

Gan also said that the negative comments on the video have made the situation worse and that if children had not read the comments he would be "less concerned". 

"What if my kids commit suicide because of all these negative comments?" he said. 

Expand  

All sort of excuse also can come up with to protect their precious snowflakes.strawberries.

In the first place, the father should thank the person who post the video or else he would not have known what happened until one of them ends up in children ICU from head injury.

The excuse also damn flimsy, trying to retrieve ball need to have the kids all go up and run along the whole length of the covered walkway? Cannot just walk slowly and carefully?