Workers' Party Chief Pritam Singh, Leader of the Opposition (LO)

[CarNutz]

@Sosaria Yes a portion of my day is tied up in tuition classes. They are fixed schedule lessons and so they give me a stability throughout the year. But it is still not considered as a 'career' cos there is no prestige and certainly no progression. Here in Singapore pple do judge u based on income and job titles. But heck,maybe it doesn't matter anymore. I made it up without the material trappings of success with peace of mind,lesser stress and the joy of teaching students who appreciate the work that you do. I am on track to officially retire from full time work by 55. Beyond that,you can bet your last dollar I will still be involved in education and education related businesses:)

Stay safe

Cheers

[Didu]

This trial timed nicely before the coming erection.  😁

Opposition leader Pritam Singh set to go on trial in October

Singh, 47, faces two charges of lying in Parliament to a Committee of Privileges over Raeesah Khan's case. 

According to court records, the first segment of the trial is set to begin from Oct 14 to Oct 18. Another three periods were set for the trial if necessary, spanning Oct 21 to Oct 24, Nov 5 to Nov 8 and Nov 11 to Nov 13.

Singh hired lawyers Mr Andre Darius Jumabhoy and Mr Aristotle Emmanuel Eng Zhen Yang from a boutique law firm in April.

He had made his intention to claim trial clear from the first day he was charged in court - pleading not guilty on Mar 19. The two charges Singh faces allege that he wilfully made a false answer on Dec 10, 2021 and Dec 15, 2021 in the public hearing room at Parliament House.

This was during an inquiry before the Committee of Privileges, centering on the case of Ms Khan, who had lied over a sexual assault case and accused the police of mishandling the case. Singh allegedly testified falsely that he had wanted Ms Khan to clarify what she said in Parliament about accompanying a rape victim to a police station, and that he spoke to Ms Khan as he wanted to convey to her that she had to clarify what she said over the same issue. 

If convicted of lying under the Parliament (Privileges, Immunities and Powers) Act, he could be jailed for up to three years, fined up to S$7,000, or both per charge.

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/opposition-leader-pritam-singh-set-trial-october-raeesah-khan-4376086

[mersaylee]

To lose one general...get more blue seats...worth it...💪😂👍

Lampah min and no chance meng go where...? Let's sink them together...😁

[Victor68]

This one so efficient, others took months yet no charges filed. Errection har

[inlinesix]

On 6/1/2024 at 10:57 AM, Victor68 said:

This one so efficient, others took months yet no charges filed. Errection har

3 years already still efficient?

[Victor68]

On 6/1/2024 at 12:07 PM, inlinesix said:

3 years already still efficient?

Is he the only guy implicated? That lier ok har? 😆 

[RadX]

Can suka suka one ah

 

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/AWgpp622gHnJhFpU/?mibextid=WC7FNe

[Volvobrick]

On 8/26/2024 at 3:13 PM, RadX said:

Can suka suka one ah

 

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/AWgpp622gHnJhFpU/?mibextid=WC7FNe

Like drawing erections boundaries..... 

[RadX]

On 8/26/2024 at 3:41 PM, Volvobrick said:

Like drawing erections boundaries..... 

yah lo

 

i also say

 

simce when pritam case “not of high public interest”?

[Volvobrick]

On 8/26/2024 at 3:58 PM, RadX said:

yah lo

 

i also say

 

simce when pritam case “not of high public interest”?

Why they scared neh? Want High Court just go High Court!

 

[Tianmo]

KNN go big or go home. 

In this case go high or go home. 

Come on, be a man!

 

[RadX]

On 8/26/2024 at 4:27 PM, Tianmo said:

KNN go big or go home. 

In this case go high or go home. 

Come on, be a man!

 

Ikr 

 

gd move

 

but they mai

[Freeder]

PS wants raw but they scady cat.. KNN…

[Fcw75]

On 8/26/2024 at 8:13 PM, Freeder said:

PS wants raw but they scady cat.. KNN…

 

 

Compared to Lily Neo.

Edited August 26 by Fcw75

[Sosaria]

On 8/26/2024 at 3:58 PM, RadX said:

yah lo

 

i also say

 

simce when pritam case “not of high public interest”?

In the article, they say "public interest" does not mean something which is interesting to the public; in fact the public is interested in many many cases  especially the juicy scandalous ones.

[inlinesix]

On 8/26/2024 at 10:49 PM, Sosaria said:

In the article, they say "public interest" does not mean something which is interesting to the public; in fact the public is interested in many many cases  especially the juicy scandalous ones.

You misunderstand the undertaker