Didu Turbocharged December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 Another carpark accident seeking your opinion: Beatty Secondary vice-principal gets jail for driving car into market stallhttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/beatty-secondary-vice-principal-jail-driving-car-market-stall-11064198 Do you think our law is too harsh if it's an unintentional accident? Do you think this is due to recent trend in other countries where terrorist use vehicles as a form of weapon? ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earthboy 4th Gear December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 if the injured one is your love one what would you say? for this case, the car gear box or software probably has problem. we need to have more muscle over car maker/agent. Another carpark accident seeking your opinion: Beatty Secondary vice-principal gets jail for driving car into market stallhttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/beatty-secondary-vice-principal-jail-driving-car-market-stall-11064198 Do you think our law is too harsh if it's an unintentional accident? Do you think this is due to recent trend in other countries where terrorist use vehicles as a form of weapon? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sotong1977 4th Gear December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 (edited) if the injured one is your love one what would you say? for this case, the car gear box or software probably has problem. we need to have more muscle over car maker/agent.The report stated that he was reversing his car and it bump into the kerb. My guess is his rear tyre went over it and landed behind it. He revved his car to let the rear tyre mount over the kerb and back in front and the car shot forward. If its true, he was guilty of losing ctrl of his car and his action injured the people in the shop. Edited December 27, 2018 by Sotong1977 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celicar Turbocharged December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 if the injured one is your love one what would you say? for this case, the car gear box or software probably has problem. we need to have more muscle over car maker/agent. The CNA report says "A mechanical inspection conducted on Lim's car found no evidence of mechanical fault or abnormality." You should probably stick to your day job. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soya Supersonic December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 From the way the news is reported, it first sounded like a terrorist act. But in the end, it's juz a kayu driver in a 'rolla who put the car in wrong gear. Careless yes. But is that a jail-able crime and a career-destroying move that MOE has to sack a VP for? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadX Moderator December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 From the way the news is reported, it first sounded like a terrorist act. But in the end, it's juz a kayu driver in a 'rolla who put the car in wrong gear. Careless yes. But is that a jail-able crime and a career-destroying move that MOE has to sack a VP for? yah lor Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earthboy 4th Gear December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 i read that he reverse to park than move forward, that was when it happened. The report stated that he was reversing his car and it bump into the kerb.My guess is his rear tyre went over it and landed behind it. He revved his car to let the rear tyre mount over the kerb and back in front and the car shot forward. If its true, he was guilty of losing ctrl of his car and his action injured the people in the shop. chill my son. why so excited. you believe the so call check? no wonder pap every GE still win. The CNA report says "A mechanical inspection conducted on Lim's car found no evidence of mechanical fault or abnormality." You should probably stick to your day job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celicar Turbocharged December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 chill my son. why so excited. you believe the so call check? no wonder pap every GE still win. And your speculation should be believed over the "so call check". All the more because you link this to PAP and GE. Right. Yes, stick to your day job, if you have one. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soya Supersonic December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 ehh...chill la Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrmilktooth Supercharged December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 thats why manuals are the BEST!!!!>.. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macrosszero Turbocharged December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 I had the same thought passing through my mind. Yes there were grievous consequences to the injured parties. But there was no malicious intent in the act. That is why it is called an accident. If it was speeding, or drink driving, I would say, serves you right. For the judge to pass a jail sentence and for the VP to lose his career over a momentary lapse of concentration or panic is not reasonable. Even if the judge wants to send a message to drivers to be holier-than-thou behind the wheel, this is not the case to do it with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watwheels Supersonic December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 (edited) SINGAPORE: The vice-principal of Beatty Secondary School was sentenced to 10 days' jail and banned from driving for 30 months on Wednesday (Dec 26) for crashing his vehicle into a market last year, injuring three. Lim Soon Wai, 52, pleaded guilty to causing grievous hurt to 58-year-old florist Yeo Lee Eng and her friend Toh Cheng Hai, 66. Another charge of causing hurt to Ms Sri Atun Lestari, a 33-year-old Indonesian domestic worker buying flowers from the stall, was taken into consideration. The court heard that Lim was trying to reverse his vehicle into a car park lot at the hawker centre at Block 50A Marine Terrace past noon on Dec 9 last year. While he was reversing into an empty lot, he switched gears to drive forward, but could not control his car. It surged forward, mounting a kerb and crashing head-on into a stall selling flowers. The impact threw Mr Toh on his back, while the two women fainted upon the crash. The three victims were taken to Changi General Hospital, with Mr Toh sustaining a crushing injury to his foot, which is now deformed and permanently disabled. The florist fractured her ankle and sustained a partial tear in a shoulder tendon, while the maid at the stall suffered from giddiness and an abrasion. A mechanical inspection conducted on Lim's car found no evidence of mechanical fault or abnormality. The judge granted Lim a deferment of his sentence till Jan 15. In response to Channel NewsAsia's queries, the Ministry of Education (MOE) confirmed that Lim was still employed by the ministry. MOE added that it takes a "serious view" of misconduct by its employees. "(MOE) will not hesitate to take disciplinary action against those who fail to adhere to our standards of conduct and discipline," said a ministry spokesperson. "As Mr Lim is an MOE staff, we will review the case based on our internal disciplinary processes." Source: CNA/ll/nc(hm) His negligence caused permanent disability to one of the three victims. I think this is a reason for him to get a jail sentence. Who spread fake news to say he got sacked and had his career ruined? Edited December 27, 2018 by Watwheels 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahjong74 Supercharged December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 His negligence caused permanent disability to one of the three victims. I think this is a reason for him to get a jail sentence. Who spread fake news to say he got sacked and had his career ruined? The COO of SMRT was caught drink driving and jailed for 2 weeks. But he still managed to keep his job. Not sure if MOE can adopt the similar approach or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kia7200 5th Gear December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 Maybe the car she is driving is so boring until she fall asleep Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ct3833 Supersonic December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 Well we are not perfect and we ourselves make mistake at times , he just had an ass luck and shit happen at a wrong time. Give him a chance and let him move on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didu Turbocharged December 27, 2018 Author Share December 27, 2018 "MOE added that it takes a "serious view" of misconduct by its employees. (MOE) will not hesitate to take disciplinary action against those who fail to adhere to our standards of conduct and discipline," said a ministry spokesperson. As Mr Lim is an MOE staff, we will review the case based on our internal disciplinary processes." Not sure if the above MOE statements are relevant to this case. Are they really looking into VP's moral and integrity which may have caused this accident to happen? Or is MOE making a generic statement just to say something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahjong74 Supercharged December 27, 2018 Share December 27, 2018 I had the same thought passing through my mind. Yes there were grievous consequences to the injured parties. But there was no malicious intent in the act. That is why it is called an accident. If it was speeding, or drink driving, I would say, serves you right. For the judge to pass a jail sentence and for the VP to lose his career over a momentary lapse of concentration or panic is not reasonable. Even if the judge wants to send a message to drivers to be holier-than-thou behind the wheel, this is not the case to do it with. Quite pity him actually. According to Wan Bao, this vice principal just got divorced, 3 daughters still schooling. 1 of the daughters is currently studying oversea. His burden must be quite heavy. Hope he doesn't lose his job. Anyway all the accident victims have already forgiven him, none of them ask for or pursue for any compensation. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeeMore_76399 Neutral Newbie February 23, 2019 Share February 23, 2019 I guess if the intention wasnt there and there are no serious injuries the law shouldnt be too harsh on him ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now