Jump to content

Leong Sze Hian in the news


Playtime
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Wind30 said:

.... the main difference is that the guy who got sued is NOT the author, just someone who shared the post (messenger). He also took down the post when informed. 

To me, I think it is reasonable for the guy who wants to write a long article to spend the due diligence to fact check. Are we placing that Responsibility on anyone who click the share button???  

That is ridiculous as it will totally discourages any free share of information. Am I to fact check every single ariticle I think it is worthy to share with my friends????? Or make sure all of it is true???

It is beyond ridiculous.

I thought LKY mainly go after the author, or I am wrong? 

My family used to deliver newpapers for a living.... will we get sued for sharing anything defamatory written in it??? this is beyond ridiculous. 

It sets a very dangerous precedent. LSH might have anti establishment intent but this is setting the bar way too low considering he removed the article shortly.

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Weez911 said:

Any crowdfund link? I will donate to help uncle Leong.

From Lim Tean FB:

Crowdfund for Leong Sze Hian
POSB Savings: 064064070
PayNow: S0009739Z

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

no lawyers in MCF?

I am wondering how the damages is decided by the judge.

Since there are 9000 over shares for the post, does it mean LHL can get over a billion  dollars if he goes after all he sharers?

If not, is there a law that prevents that from happening and why is one sharer assigned a big portion of the damages?

 

Edited by Wind30
  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wind30 said:

no lawyers in MCF?

I am wondering how the damages is decided by the judge.

Since there are 9000 over shares for the post, does it mean LHL can get over a billion  dollars if he goes after all he sharers?

If not, is there a law that prevents that from happening and why is one sharer assigned a big portion of the damages?

 

probably damages pluck from the air....or maybe the boss spent 30 mins in court and that cost him 100k loss of his time based on his income ba...[laugh]

  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Wind30 said:

 

My family used to deliver newpapers for a living.... will we get sued for sharing anything defamatory written in it??? this is beyond ridiculous. 

frankly speaking if this happen somewhere else, we might kenna sanctions already😂

  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Next time all of you please check the accuracy of my posts before clicking the LIKE button.

Please don't anyhow LIKE my post, ok?

  • Haha! 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Staff69 said:

seems like lawyer make money either way. 

wont it be cheaper if they voted rather than help pay fines all the time?

  • Praise 1
  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2021 at 10:41 AM, Spidey10 said:

us laymen is at the mercy of this millionaires.....i cannot afford to pay the 133k or even 13k!

better for us laymen to stop commenting on the FB page of these millionaires….skali, say something wrong...another letter shoot out..

i think he won the battle but probably lost the war...

my mom used to run a small stall in the wet market but has since retired ....and the whole market knows her...u know lah...in the older days the pple gather and talk...and all the aunties gather and talk and talk..in this case, I heard from my mom, it also came up in their conversation, pretty informative...and yes, some aunties (one of them, my mom) came home and  told the family not to simply write or say anything on social media...hahahhah...sounded fearful!

am sure there is always a rebellious child in the family and go against the family words..so came some comments like want to say or write something also cannot now...just quietly suck tumb and go to sleep..

sorry ah, my market singlish...[laugh]

Cannot write cannot say? Fear Uncertainty Doubt? 

That's exactly what they want la.

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)
On 3/25/2021 at 8:51 AM, Wind30 said:

.... the main difference is that the guy who got sued is NOT the author, just someone who shared the post (messenger). He also took down the post when informed. 

To me, I think it is reasonable for the guy who wants to write a long article to spend the due diligence to fact check. Are we placing that Responsibility on anyone who click the share button???  

That is ridiculous as it will totally discourages any free share of information. Am I to fact check every single ariticle I think it is worthy to share with my friends????? Or make sure all of it is true???

It is beyond ridiculous.

I thought LKY mainly go after the author, or I am wrong? 

My family used to deliver newpapers for a living.... will we get sued for sharing anything defamatory written in it??? this is beyond ridiculous. 

You guys dont see it. It is not about re-posting an article or who was the one who wrote the article. If Leong broke the law the police would have deal with him, put him on trial and fine/jail. He got sued by pm personally. Not the govt sue him or his political party sued him.

Of all the damaging articles Leong chose one that is personal. If I'm pm I will think, "ok, you wanna punch below the belt and want to appear to look innocent by re-posting the damaging article. I am all game. Bring you to court.".

Like I said it's not about plagiarism or re-posting w/o permission. It is personal.

Leong tries to look innocent but imo he is not a saint. He knew what he was doing and he knows how to siam to avoid trouble with the law.

 

Edited by Watwheels
  • Praise 3
  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

That stupid libel law is passed by who? 

Just vote all those clowns out lah. This is beyond ridiculous and a waste of valuable court resources and tax payers money.

If that petty one is so sore about it in his "personal capacity", he should sue that real author in the source country in his personal capacity and not shoot the messenger.

Unless he has no faith in another country's libel law? Why is Singapore libel law is so different? Isn't libel about someone saying false harmful staff that hurt someone's reputation? How different can it be from country to country?

Ah... I think I know why different. 

Edited by Weez911
  • Haha! 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Supercharged
1 hour ago, ToyotaShuttle said:

Cannot write cannot say? Fear Uncertainty Doubt? 

That's exactly what they want la.

for sure! Do as I say or else....

  • Haha! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fcw75 said:

Have you guys seen the famiLee lost a court case before since LKY?

If Lee vs Lee then one must lose right?

↡ Advertisement
  • Haha! 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...