Adrianli Hypersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 (edited) You never cover up at the SY ah? Nope. Last time was driving a COE car, not bothered with paint work. But glass also kena, claybar the windscreen until I siao. Edited January 8, 2016 by Adrianli ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nav14 6th Gear January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 How come AGO never go question TP, their failure to nab speeding commercial vehicles had resulted in how much losses daily or annually? Precisely. If TP does decide to take some concrete action against speeding commercial vehicles and for not keeping to the left lanes, their collection in fines for one week can cover the parking fees collected from all teachers in one whole year. Just need to employ one cisco personnel with a video camera mounted on a motor bike for each expresway and go around recording all these vehicles not keeping to the left, even if TP have problem recruiting enough TP officers. Just need to redeploy 3-4 outsourced CISCO personnel from the side of bus lanes onto roads and the resoruces can be maximised to triple, quadruple the fines collected.. AGO should expand the scope to such areas if their primary goal is fairness and maximising collections. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wt_know Supersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 (edited) can set the barrier up during 7.00-7.20am ... easy peasy To add , dropping off kids will also take much longer with longer queus formed due to the operation of barrier. catch traffic offenders is too passive ... 1 day catch how many ... after 1-2 ops already ... all scare liao too much effort to make some peanut money car park lot is a piece of land sitting there ... can generate $$ every hour every minute ... lol report highlighted $66k per month and that is for 1 institution only leh ... Precisely. If TP does decide to take some concrete action against speeding commercial vehicles and for not keeping to the left lanes, their collection in fines for one week can cover the parking fees collected from all teachers in one whole year. Just need to employ one cisco personnel with a video camera mounted on a motor bike for each expresway and go around recording all these vehicles not keeping to the left, even if TP have problem recruiting enough TP officers. Just need to redeploy 3-4 outsourced CISCO personnel from the side of bus lanes onto roads and the resoruces can be maximised to triple, quadruple the fines collected.. AGO should expand the scope to such areas if their primary goal is fairness and maximising collections. Edited January 8, 2016 by Wt_know Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nzy Twincharged January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 MOE would have overlooked that imposing parking charges in schools will result in illegal parking and jams outside the schools with all the resultant costs. Parents instead of waiting inside the school (many schools still allow this) to pick up their kids will now end up waiting outside the school. Then the next thing they'll do is station those LTA/TP outside the school to summon all these who park there illegally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matoonia 6th Gear January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 Then the next thing they'll do is station those LTA/TP outside the school to summon all these who park there illegally. Already have loh, every morning outside my kid's school have 2 Aetos officer waiting outside the gate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icemaiden 6th Gear January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 This entire thread if out of point and out of focus - a result of people not reading and anyhow comment. It's about charging parking for those lecturers and tutors in ITE and poly etc. Suddenly people start crying foul about charging parking for teachers in primary and secondary schools. And these lecturers and tutors etc are not as lowly paid as you think such that they can't afford paying for parking like other working adults. In fact, every time I see someone being interviewed on TV about investing in third or fourth property, there is a very high chance that this investor is a teacher. If these lecturers or tutors are not prepared to pay parking charges for use of scare space, then just take public transport. What is the furore about? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sosaria Twincharged January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 (edited) It's not as simple as that, just because educators are assumed to be highly paid, then therefore they should pay for parking. Luckily for the braniacs that came up with this idea, singaporeans are very obedient and docile. If this stunt was tried in western countries, then the teachers would just work minimum hours, go home on the dot, citing parking charges as a factor. Or likewise, can arrangement be made for them to work from home, no need to report to office unless there are classes? I am quite sure this will happen to some extent, quietly. In the end, our own children that attend schools would suffer the knock-on effects. Edited January 8, 2016 by Sosaria Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icemaiden 6th Gear January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 Parking spaces in university, polys and other higher education institutions take up scarce resources, especially in land scarce Singapore and students pay significant tuition fees, with further subsidies from tax payers. Are you sure overseas colleges don't charge parking charges? If students have to pay the parking charges, I don't see how these lecturers or tutors should be subsidised. Parking charges are few hundreds a month? How much do these lecturers make to cause them to make a big fuss about it? Those lecturers that take public transport can save up on these parking charges and have a higher take home pay. Those that want the luxury of driving to work just have to pay parking from their salary. It's about time we stop viewing lecturers as VICTIMS. Even students despite their school fees pay parking. It's not as simple as that, just because educators are assumed to be highly paid, then therefore they should pay for parking. Luckily for the braniacs that came up with this idea, singaporeans are very obedient and docile. If this stunt was tried in western countries, then the teachers would just work minimum hours, go home on the dot, citing parking charges as a factor. Or likewise, can arrangement be made for them to work from home, no need to report to office unless there are classes? I am quite sure this will happen to some extent, quietly. In the end, our own children that attend schools would suffer the knock-on effects. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonyhawk2 3rd Gear January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 Are schools supposed to generate a profit/income? What's going on with my Singapore? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weez911 Supersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 This entire thread if out of point and out of focus - a result of people not reading and anyhow comment. It's about charging parking for those lecturers and tutors in ITE and poly etc. Suddenly people start crying foul about charging parking for teachers in primary and secondary schools. And these lecturers and tutors etc are not as lowly paid as you think such that they can't afford paying for parking like other working adults. In fact, every time I see someone being interviewed on TV about investing in third or fourth property, there is a very high chance that this investor is a teacher. If these lecturers or tutors are not prepared to pay parking charges for use of scare space, then just take public transport. What is the furore about? Though you have rightly pointed out that the AGO report is meant for ITE and poly, it will have a knock-on impact on all public schools if MOE is made to tweak its policies relating to staff benefits across the ministry. I think you have overgeneralised teachers and property investors. Objectively, teachers are not among the highest-paid professions in Singapore, and subjectively, I don't think they are very well-paid considering the hours they put in. If you are using season parking as a yardstick for salary, then I think most of us are very well-paid indeed. Although land space is scarce in Singapore, those designated carpark areas in each school can't really be converted into any residential project or wet market, can they? Why make teachers pay for such spaces then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soya Supersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 Ahemmmm......so many cry farder marder here. Muz hv alot of teachers in MCF......keke. 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitvip Supersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 Does anyone know whether parking charges are imposed at the big building next to Plaza Singapura? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamburger Hypersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 Me no complain cos we deserve it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanCoe Hypersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 Does anyone know whether parking charges are imposed at the big building next to Plaza Singapura?That place inside no white line - no double yellow line- no zig zag line - no bus bay - no red line also - so how like dat 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soya Supersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 Does anyone know whether parking charges are imposed at the big building next to Plaza Singapura? The big building next to Plaza Sing - u mean Istana.......?? 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1fast1 Supersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 The big building next to Plaza Sing - u mean Istana.......?? Istana? You mean KFC main outlet....?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamesc Hypersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 Must have been the teachers that don't own cars that complained. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kusje Supersonic January 8, 2016 Share January 8, 2016 Istana? You mean KFC main outlet....?? It was previously a prata stall. Now convert to selling fried chicken. Must have been the teachers that don't own cars that complained. No one is so free la. Anyway, I hope the teachers with cars complain and ask for more salary. My wife is a teacher and she doesn't drive so she can gain from that ↡ Advertisement 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Want to buy Season Parking at Paya Lebar Square or Singpost
Want to buy Season Parking at Paya Lebar Square or Singpost
Parking Idiot / Parking Fail / Anyhow Park...
Parking Idiot / Parking Fail / Anyhow Park...
What parking app to use in JB?
What parking app to use in JB?
Mandai Bird Paradise
Mandai Bird Paradise
Straits Times - Devastated after being rejected by three schools for DSA: How to help your child cope
Straits Times - Devastated after being rejected by three schools for DSA: How to help your child cope
More Copycat: India school logo same as S’pore Sports School logo, principal says nothing to discuss
More Copycat: India school logo same as S’pore Sports School logo, principal says nothing to discuss
MOE to remove Mobile Guardian app from students' devices after hacking incident report
MOE to remove Mobile Guardian app from students' devices after hacking incident report
Wads the fine for parking opposite continuos white line?
Wads the fine for parking opposite continuos white line?