nazerath Turbocharged December 26, 2015 Share December 26, 2015 What is the correct way to do so? I normally wait for the people to cross then I go, but so long as the people have not crossed the Center divider on a dual carriage way, I will turn.is that the right way? Or do I have to wait for them to cross completely regardless of where they are? Reason for asking is that I see enforcement officers taking a video camera on a tripod pointing at the crossings twice in a week. ↡ Advertisement 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doppel Turbocharged December 26, 2015 Share December 26, 2015 (edited) What is the correct way to do so? I normally wait for the people to cross then I go, but so long as the people have not crossed the Center divider on a dual carriage way, I will turn.is that the right way? Or do I have to wait for them to cross completely regardless of where they are? Reason for asking is that I see enforcement officers taking a video camera on a tripod pointing at the crossings twice in a week. Based on my understanding, you have to wait for the pedestrians to cross to the other side first, before you can turn. You can turn after they have crossed but not before; you do not need to wait for them to reach the other side but you can only turn your car behind their direction of walking, not in front. If you turn and cut in front into their direction of walking, it is an offence. Which is almost impossible because there are idiotic pedestrians who do not follow the rules and start crossing when the green man is already flickering, which is against the rules. Not to mention there are those who saunter, take their own sweet time and look at their smartphones while crossing. Edited December 26, 2015 by Doppel 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazerath Turbocharged December 26, 2015 Author Share December 26, 2015 What if they have not reach the half at which I can turn? I was taught I could if I remember correctly. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamburger Hypersonic December 26, 2015 Share December 26, 2015 it's by right but I always by left, 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doppel Turbocharged December 26, 2015 Share December 26, 2015 What if they have not reach the half at which I can turn? I was taught I could if I remember correctly.Based on my understanding, that is an offence, as you are cutting in front into their direction of crossing, albeit they have not reached the section of the road which you are turning into. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazerath Turbocharged December 26, 2015 Author Share December 26, 2015 (edited) thanks for your reply. clear and concise. i actually waited for all to clear before proceeding. Drivers do be careful at crossings now. Edited December 26, 2015 by nazerath 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doppel Turbocharged December 26, 2015 Share December 26, 2015 thanks for your reply. clear and concise. i actually waited for all to clear before proceeding. Drivers do be careful at crossings now. It is not required to wait for the pedestrians to complete their crossing, as long as you turn behind their direction of crossing. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nzy Twincharged December 26, 2015 Share December 26, 2015 Just remember that we cannot turn infront of the pedestrians. That is an offence. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
13177 Hypersonic December 26, 2015 Share December 26, 2015 Just remember that we cannot turn infront of the pedestrians. That is an offence. Looks like many drivers turn infront of the pedestrians, and some even turned very close to the pedestrians! And yet I don't see drivers get summon due to this offence? 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nazerath Turbocharged December 26, 2015 Author Share December 26, 2015 Any idea how many demerit points for that? Seems like there is now enforcement for it. I have seen it on zebra crossings but never on junction. If we follow the rules strictly there would be serious congestion. 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nzy Twincharged December 27, 2015 Share December 27, 2015 Looks like many drivers turn infront of the pedestrians, and some even turned very close to the pedestrians! And yet I don't see drivers get summon due to this offence? No enforcement lo. Just like stopping at stop lines also. By right need to come to a complete stop before moving off again. But how many drivers do that? 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mercs Hypersonic January 22, 2016 Share January 22, 2016 Driver knocks into cyclist at pedestrian crossing while light still shows "green man" at Pasir Ris Dr 1 http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/this-urban-jungle/driver-knocks-into-cyclist-at-pedestrian-crossing-while-light-still-shows-green 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IcyColdGemini 1st Gear January 22, 2016 Share January 22, 2016 Driver knocks into cyclist at pedestrian crossing while light still shows "green man" at Pasir Ris Dr 1 http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/this-urban-jungle/driver-knocks-into-cyclist-at-pedestrian-crossing-while-light-still-shows-green Pretty sad to see how physically reactive the driver was towards the cyclist instead of checking on him when the driver almost ran over the cyclist. I mean the cyclist was also at fault as he was "supposed to dismount when crossing light junctions" as mandated by the Singapore law. However the driver in this case reacted as if he was the victim. Driving in Singapore really stress lol. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jman888 Moderator January 22, 2016 Share January 22, 2016 Pretty sad to see how physically reactive the driver was towards the cyclist instead of checking on him when the driver almost ran over the cyclist. I mean the cyclist was also at fault as he was "supposed to dismount when crossing light junctions" as mandated by the Singapore law. However the driver in this case reacted as if he was the victim. Driving in Singapore really stress lol. the cyclist actually jumped off the bike unharm but it seem to be like the driver not paying attention since the green man light still on. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kr_toy 1st Gear January 22, 2016 Share January 22, 2016 Pretty sad to see how physically reactive the driver was towards the cyclist instead of checking on him when the driver almost ran over the cyclist. I mean the cyclist was also at fault as he was "supposed to dismount when crossing light junctions" as mandated by the Singapore law. However the driver in this case reacted as if he was the victim. Driving in Singapore really stress lol. This driver must be dreaming while driving, the cyclist is just so obvious in front of him and yet still run it over. Some drivers are just blatantly impatient..and yet think he is right. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthrevan Supercharged January 22, 2016 Share January 22, 2016 Any idea how many demerit points for that? Seems like there is now enforcement for it. I have seen it on zebra crossings but never on junction. If we follow the rules strictly there would be serious congestion. safety(of pedestrians) is of paramount importance..after all if pedestrians get hit by drivers(or riders)..who gets the most blame? at the most..only ~2 minutes get wasted due to waiting for next green light 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nzy Twincharged January 22, 2016 Share January 22, 2016 Pretty sad to see how physically reactive the driver was towards the cyclist instead of checking on him when the driver almost ran over the cyclist. I mean the cyclist was also at fault as he was "supposed to dismount when crossing light junctions" as mandated by the Singapore law. However the driver in this case reacted as if he was the victim. Driving in Singapore really stress lol. Even though the cyclist should have pushed his bike across, he wasn't those reckless kind also. He was cycling quite slowly, probably about the speed of someone brisk-walking or jogging. No excuse for the driver not to notice him. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neutrino Supercharged January 22, 2016 Share January 22, 2016 Even though the cyclist should have pushed his bike across, he wasn't those reckless kind also. He was cycling quite slowly, probably about the speed of someone brisk-walking or jogging. No excuse for the driver not to notice him. You are correct. But in a court I wouldn't expect 100% blame to motorist. Maybe 15% or more to cyclist. Both actually breaking the law. If two people break law who to blame? ↡ Advertisement 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Why pedestrian like to do funny things
Why pedestrian like to do funny things
Woodlands Checkpoint vs Tuas Checkpoint
Woodlands Checkpoint vs Tuas Checkpoint
Ang Mo Kio junction to be turned into temporary roundabout for North-South Corridor works
Ang Mo Kio junction to be turned into temporary roundabout for North-South Corridor works
Traffic junction without traffic lights
Traffic junction without traffic lights
Never Gonna Parliament - a COE/car market restructuring plan idea
Never Gonna Parliament - a COE/car market restructuring plan idea
Cross Island Line to take direct route across sgp
Cross Island Line to take direct route across sgp
2018 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
2018 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Old WW2 Relic disposals
Old WW2 Relic disposals