Redfur 1st Gear January 12, 2016 Share January 12, 2016 If it's NA I can't see any reason not getting the Harrier at 10k higher in price but also 15k higher in omv.. Yup, no reason not to get a harrier if that fit your needs. I look at XT for subaru's 4WD off road capability and technology cos i need to drive up to rural areas in MY without proper roads. Combined with the right size, best handling and power at this price, i dun have much options. Also, being a subaru its less likely to get stolen in MY. Top ten list of cars that got stolen are all the proton models followed by Toyota and Honda (Reported in Media). Harrier top their fav 'to steal suv' list. (Hearsay by fellow Msians) I never really went deep into understanding so don't quote me on this. i sort of learned that, higher OMV will means you are actually incurring interest on the loan to pay for the higher OMV because selling price will be higher for a higher OMV car. And, unless u looking to scrap the car after 10 years, it is interest paid for nothing. If you sell your car after 3 years, it would mean you paid 3 years of interest on that extra $10,000 price. The resale value of your car is largely determined by the future COE price and the price of the brand new same model when you sell, not base on the time when you bought. So in a way, OMV matter more if you want to use the car for 10 years, but not so much if you looking to sell within few years. ↡ Advertisement 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayoflight 5th Gear January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 Anyone can recommend me a Subaru SE? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wondertree 3rd Gear January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 Yup, no reason not to get a harrier if that fit your needs. I look at XT for subaru's 4WD off road capability and technology cos i need to drive up to rural areas in MY without proper roads. Combined with the right size, best handling and power at this price, i dun have much options. Also, being a subaru its less likely to get stolen in MY. Top ten list of cars that got stolen are all the proton models followed by Toyota and Honda (Reported in Media). Harrier top their fav 'to steal suv' list. (Hearsay by fellow Msians) I never really went deep into understanding so don't quote me on this. i sort of learned that, higher OMV will means you are actually incurring interest on the loan to pay for the higher OMV because selling price will be higher for a higher OMV car. And, unless u looking to scrap the car after 10 years, it is interest paid for nothing. If you sell your car after 3 years, it would mean you paid 3 years of interest on that extra $10,000 price. The resale value of your car is largely determined by the future COE price and the price of the brand new same model when you sell, not base on the time when you bought. So in a way, OMV matter more if you want to use the car for 10 years, but not so much if you looking to sell within few years. I don't deny at all that getting Harrier costs you more than Frosty NA, but the exact one important factor missing from your analysis is that you would be driving a better car at marginally higher price. Better trim, more spacious, less thirsty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tohto Hypersonic January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 Anyone can recommend me a Subaru SE? Your 316i do until so nice, you want to change ah? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
siausin Neutral Newbie January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 Forester 2016 new face-lift video. Nice little changes in head and tail lights. https://youtu.be/UYvXe3JTLO0 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayoflight 5th Gear January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 Your 316i do until so nice, you want to change ah? Looking around .. Itchy backside haha New touran also coming.. See whether nice anot.. Haha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chucky2007 Turbocharged January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 I don't deny at all that getting Harrier costs you more than Frosty NA, but the exact one important factor missing from your analysis is that you would be driving a better car at marginally higher price. Better trim, more spacious, less thirsty.Eh..10-15k more is comparing Forester XT to Harrier.. if it's FNA, it's easily 20-25k more. I agree with less thirty aspect because it's a front wheel drive vs AWD. Trim wise depends individually.. before buying the forester, I was told the interior of the Harrier is so good.. I went to view the basic without sun roof and the premium with sun roof and not impressed at the aspect of trim, it's not bad but I wouldn't buy the Harrier because of its interior (you know some cars the interior is so good can overlook other factors).. maybe because considered many factors in, and also viewed quite a number of other SUV. Space wise, both fotester and Harrier are similar actually. Side track also, got a friend who got harrier and drove to KL last week. Told me at constant depressing of the accelerator, when the Harrier hit 130km/hr, lost the torque and speed came down to 120-110.. no high end torque.. he really look disappointed. But of course city driving absolutely no issue and pleasant to drive the Harrier. For Forester XT.. at 160 still accelerating without fully depressing pedal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wondertree 3rd Gear January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 Eh..10-15k more is comparing Forester XT to Harrier.. if it's FNA, it's easily 20-25k more. I agree with less thirty aspect because it's a front wheel drive vs AWD. Trim wise depends individually.. before buying the forester, I was told the interior of the Harrier is so good.. I went to view the basic without sun roof and the premium with sun roof and not impressed at the aspect of trim, it's not bad but I wouldn't buy the Harrier because of its interior (you know some cars the interior is so good can overlook other factors).. maybe because considered many factors in, and also viewed quite a number of other SUV. Space wise, both fotester and Harrier are similar actually. Side track also, got a friend who got harrier and drove to KL last week. Told me at constant depressing of the accelerator, when the Harrier hit 130km/hr, lost the torque and speed came down to 120-110.. no high end torque.. he really look disappointed. But of course city driving absolutely no issue and pleasant to drive the Harrier. For Forester XT.. at 160 still accelerating without fully depressing pedal. I was quoting when someone mentioned FL NA is going to cost $125k. At $110k it's a hell of an SUV, not so when it becomes 15k more ex. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chucky2007 Turbocharged January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 I was quoting when someone mentioned FL NA is going to cost $125k. At $110k it's a hell of an SUV, not so when it becomes 15k more ex.No la.. NA version I think it's around 113k. It's like 25-30k cheaper than the lowest specs Harrier while forester NA specs is not shaddy at all, big sun roof, electric seat etc.. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seenlife Neutral Newbie January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 Relative to the compact crossovers like Vezel and Qashqai, the NA Forester @ $113,800 is now $7k-$12k more compared to a gap of only $3k-$8k due to CAT A COE drop of $9k. MI will be foolish (but likely) to launch the MY2016 Forester @ too much of a price premium at the Motorshow considering that the 7-seater SUVs like Outlander and X-Trail is now $124k-$130k. The FXT is good value if it stays at $124,800 but still has only 5 seats at the end of the day. Heard that the headlights and tailights will both be LEDs with DRL in the fog light housing but otherwise no major equipment changes. The $2k-$3k trading margin probably still applies for those considering the Forester. Torn between getting the Forester or the more practical Wish/Outlander now although the new Touran looks interesting too...if only the Exiga is available in SG! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinceng Turbocharged January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 Eh..10-15k more is comparing Forester XT to Harrier.. if it's FNA, it's easily 20-25k more. I agree with less thirty aspect because it's a front wheel drive vs AWD. Trim wise depends individually.. before buying the forester, I was told the interior of the Harrier is so good.. I went to view the basic without sun roof and the premium with sun roof and not impressed at the aspect of trim, it's not bad but I wouldn't buy the Harrier because of its interior (you know some cars the interior is so good can overlook other factors).. maybe because considered many factors in, and also viewed quite a number of other SUV. Space wise, both fotester and Harrier are similar actually. Side track also, got a friend who got harrier and drove to KL last week. Told me at constant depressing of the accelerator, when the Harrier hit 130km/hr, lost the torque and speed came down to 120-110.. no high end torque.. he really look disappointed. But of course city driving absolutely no issue and pleasant to drive the Harrier. For Forester XT.. at 160 still accelerating without fully depressing pedal. Forester XT should have no problem to achieve such high speed . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinceng Turbocharged January 13, 2016 Share January 13, 2016 (edited) Relative to the compact crossovers like Vezel and Qashqai, the NA Forester @ $113,800 is now $7k-$12k more compared to a gap of only $3k-$8k due to CAT A COE drop of $9k. MI will be foolish (but likely) to launch the MY2016 Forester @ too much of a price premium at the Motorshow considering that the 7-seater SUVs like Outlander and X-Trail is now $124k-$130k. The FXT is good value if it stays at $124,800 but still has only 5 seats at the end of the day. Heard that the headlights and tailights will both be LEDs with DRL in the fog light housing but otherwise no major equipment changes. The $2k-$3k trading margin probably still applies for those considering the Forester. Torn between getting the Forester or the more practical Wish/Outlander now although the new Touran looks interesting too...if only the Exiga is available in SG! [\quote] ±±++++++++++(++++++±+++++++ If you need a genuine 7 seater that can accommodate 7 adults, at your kind of budget, it's got to be the Mazda 5. The 7 seaters you are looking at, the last row seat fits children best. Would be a squeeze for adults. Edited January 13, 2016 by Vinceng Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tohto Hypersonic January 14, 2016 Share January 14, 2016 (edited) Relative to the compact crossovers like Vezel and Qashqai, the NA Forester @ $113,800 is now $7k-$12k more compared to a gap of only $3k-$8k due to CAT A COE drop of $9k. MI will be foolish (but likely) to launch the MY2016 Forester @ too much of a price premium at the Motorshow considering that the 7-seater SUVs like Outlander and X-Trail is now $124k-$130k. The FXT is good value if it stays at $124,800 but still has only 5 seats at the end of the day. Heard that the headlights and tailights will both be LEDs with DRL in the fog light housing but otherwise no major equipment changes. The $2k-$3k trading margin probably still applies for those considering the Forester. Torn between getting the Forester or the more practical Wish/Outlander now although the new Touran looks interesting too...if only the Exiga is available in SG! Not every buyer want the 7 seat lah. For me the 5 seat is good for me. Even for the X Trial, the 3rd row are so squeeze... Most of the buyer who bought the Forester XT are due to the performance. Including me waiting at the sideline. I originally target the Harrier, after test drive FXT. What I want is very clear Edited January 14, 2016 by Tohto Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chucky2007 Turbocharged January 14, 2016 Share January 14, 2016 (edited) Relative to the compact crossovers like Vezel and Qashqai, the NA Forester @ $113,800 is now $7k-$12k more compared to a gap of only $3k-$8k due to CAT A COE drop of $9k. MI will be foolish (but likely) to launch the MY2016 Forester @ too much of a price premium at the Motorshow considering that the 7-seater SUVs like Outlander and X-Trail is now $124k-$130k. The FXT is good value if it stays at $124,800 but still has only 5 seats at the end of the day. Heard that the headlights and tailights will both be LEDs with DRL in the fog light housing but otherwise no major equipment changes. The $2k-$3k trading margin probably still applies for those considering the Forester. Torn between getting the Forester or the more practical Wish/Outlander now although the new Touran looks interesting too...if only the Exiga is available in SG! If you need 7 seater most of the time.. wish is needed, Outlander a little tight on row3, but still can. But if really seldom utilise full vehicle for 7 pax on daily basis.. reconsider Outlander. . The FC think quite fierce.. VW Torran?? 1.4T? Reconsider that man.. Forester XT should have no problem to achieve such high speed .Highest I went was 200km/hr.. because got cars in front on NSHW so slowed back to 130. But above 200 to around 210-220 should be ok Not every buyer want the 7 seat lah. For me the 5 seat is good for me. Even for the X Trial, the 3rd row are so squeeze... Most of the buyer who bought the Forester XT are due to the performance. Including me waiting at the sideline. I originally target the Harrier, after test drive FXT. What I want is very clear If PI ever give u a chance to test drive Harrier on NSHW. . The choice even clearer.. My friend's disappoint face after driving back from KL in his new Harrier looks really...disappointed Edited January 14, 2016 by Chucky2007 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djcoolmax 2nd Gear January 14, 2016 Share January 14, 2016 (edited) News for Forester and XV owners. http://jalopnik.com/subaru-settles-lawsuit-over-oil-burning-cars-1752805682 defective piston rings caused them to burn extra oil, and that Subaru knew of the problem. affected FB engines are the 2.5-liter engines in the 2011-2014 Forester, 2013 Legacy and 2013 Outback and the 2.0-liter engines in the 2012-2013 Impreza and 2013 XV Crosstrek. Edited January 14, 2016 by Djcoolmax Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmdsea 3rd Gear January 14, 2016 Share January 14, 2016 News for Forester and XV owners. http://jalopnik.com/subaru-settles-lawsuit-over-oil-burning-cars-1752805682 "affected FB engines are the 2.5-liter engines in the 2011-2014 Forester, 2013 Legacy and 2013 Outback and the 2.0-liter engines in the 2012-2013 Impreza and 2013 XV Crosstrek". These engines arent used in the Singapore Forester or XV so not an issue for local owners. Might be relevant to Outback or Legacy drivers though... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mkl22 Supersonic January 14, 2016 Share January 14, 2016 News for Forester and XV owners. http://jalopnik.com/subaru-settles-lawsuit-over-oil-burning-cars-1752805682 The forester here are not affected. There is no 2.5. For xv there is only the small number of 2.0 which MI Sold. Not sure of the production year that MI Brought in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarion 4th Gear January 14, 2016 Share January 14, 2016 Does anyone know if the new forester is displayed at the Singapore motor show? Cant get any info searching on the web... ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Advice on exhaust.
Advice on exhaust.
Hyundai Sonata (2015)
Hyundai Sonata (2015)
New Subaru XV
New Subaru XV
K-DENT P.D.R & Windshield Repair
K-DENT P.D.R & Windshield Repair
2015 Mazda CX3
2015 Mazda CX3
sgCarMart Reviews: Audi A6 Sedan Mild Hybrid 2.0 TFSI S tronic Design
sgCarMart Reviews: Audi A6 Sedan Mild Hybrid 2.0 TFSI S tronic Design
2016 / 2017 Subaru Impreza
2016 / 2017 Subaru Impreza