Jump to content

Assault conviction quashed


Darryn
 Share

Recommended Posts

Turbocharged

I searched for his name....no results...

 

Assault conviction was quashed after two new witnesses came forward.

 

http://www.tnp.sg/news/singapore-news/man-jailed-cabbie-assault-has-conviction-quashed

 

1. Why plead guilty if you didn't do it?

2. I wonder if he can sue for compensation?

3. I wonder....If really didn't happen, how would cabby feel now?

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I searched for his name....no results...

 

Assault conviction was quashed after two new witnesses came forward.

 

http://www.tnp.sg/news/singapore-news/man-jailed-cabbie-assault-has-conviction-quashed

 

1. Why plead guilty if you didn't do it?

2. I wonder if he can sue for compensation?

3. I wonder....If really didn't happen, how would cabby feel now?

 

 

Will the cabby be charged for giving false statement?

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Will the cabby be charged for giving false statement?

That's what I wanna know also....very long in jail oreddy...

And prosecution didn't fight his release...so saying they were wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

Who knows where the two "witnesses" came from?

Are you impugning the integrity / honesty of the witnesses and the nous / intelligence of the police that took their statement?

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Read carefully. The conviction set aside. But charges remain. The case will be retried at a later date.

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypersonic

Very very surprised to see "witnesses" appear suddenly after so long ....

 

Agreed....

After this angmo in jail for weeks, then this thing surfaced out...

Anyway, it will be down to SPF to find out the truth ....

If cabby is also at fault, then pls bring him to task too

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypersonic

Very very surprised to see "witnesses" appear suddenly after so long ....

some witness likes to read old papers that are around 6 weeks old. And remember vividly it differ from their 'account'. 😁
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

I agree it sounds strange.

 

But what would be pure weirdness would be to plead guilty, voluntarily pay 30k in reparations, spend six weeks in jail and then get someone to lie in court for you.

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypersonic

I agree it sounds strange.

 

But what would be pure weirdness would be to plead guilty, voluntarily pay 30k in reparations, spend six weeks in jail and then get someone to lie in court for you.

 

And the witnesses must be very free and VERY righteous to stand out to help a stranger.

 

If their account of the incident is the truth, I hope he gets acquitted. If they conspire purely to get him out of jail, then please jail them too.

  • Praise 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows?

 

 

Are you impugning the integrity / honesty of the witnesses and the nous / intelligence of the police that took their statement?

 

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

And the witnesses must be very free and VERY righteous to stand out to help a stranger.

 

If their account of the incident is the truth, I hope he gets acquitted. If they conspire purely to get him out of jail, then please jail them too.

 

and it is only right for the Ang Moh to give them a big big big reward for helping him soooooo much...

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypersonic

 

and it is only right for the Ang Moh to give them a big big big reward for helping him soooooo much...

 

If he managed to do it and got away, I say well done. He deserves to get away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Norwegian who assaulted cabby has suffered 'serious injustice': Lawyer
Ng Jun Sen The New Paper Monday, May 11, 2015
He was released from prison on bail yesterday after serving more than half of his sentence for assaulting a taxi driver - because of an unexpected twist in the case.
Two witnesses have come forward to give a different account of what transpired during the incident in Boat Quay in September last year.
Mr Mohamed Ayub Shaik Dawood, a Fullerton Hotel employee, and his friend, Mr Roslan Zainal, have filed affidavits to describe what they had seen that night, which disputed the facts of the case.
As a result, Arne Corneliussen was back in court yesterday. This time, the 50-year-old Norwegian, who was clad in a purple prison uniform and handcuffed at the wrists, appeared in the High Court with a look of relief.
Corneliussen, who is a Singapore permanent resident, was sentenced to 10 weeks' jail last month after pleading guilty to assaulting cabby Chan Chuan Heng in Boat Quay on Sept 22 last year.
According to the facts of the case, he had turned violent and attacked Mr Chan, who wanted to take a toilet break, for refusing to take him as a fare.
But with the two fresh witnesses claiming that Mr Chan, and not Corneliussen, was the aggressor in the incident, Justice Chan Seng Onn yesterday quashed the guilty plea and sentence and sent the case back to the State Courts for a retrial.
Corneliussen, who has served six weeks of his jail term, was released on $5,000 bail.
The two witnesses testified in their affidavits that Corneliussen had not attacked Mr Chan. Instead, the cabby had first punched Corneliussen in the head during an argument about fares.
The Singaporeans, who were passing by the area at the time of the incident, said they did not see Corneliussen slap or choke Mr Chan.
They said they had read a newspaper report on the case and were disturbed as the account of what happened had differed greatly from what they saw.
They were surprised that Corneliussen had been jailed while Mr Chan went unpunished. They then went to Corneliussen's lawyer, Mr Terence Seah from Virtus Law, to give their accounts.
Submitting a petition to free Corneliussen in the High Court yesterday, Mr Seah read out the witnesses' affidavits and said his client had suffered from "a serious injustice".
He added that Corneliussen had pleaded guilty because he was drunk that night and did not have any recollection of the details of the altercation. He was informed by the police that the prosecution had eyewitnesses.
Said Mr Seah: "Arne was compelled to plead guilty by the circumstances."
Corneliussen had pleaded guilty to one count of voluntarily causing hurt. A second charge of slapping the cabby was taken into consideration during sentencing.
He admitted to being drunk at the time and said in his statement that it was "not (his) nature" to be violent.
Given the "exceptional turn of events", the prosecution did not object to the conviction and sentence being quashed and a retrial.
But Deputy Public Prosecutor Wong Kok Weng said this did not mean the earlier conviction was wrong.
He said the new witnesses were not at the scene when the police arrived and did not come forward during investigations.
Two other passers-by had told the police that they saw Corneliussen chasing Mr Chan and choking him, Mr Wong added.
DISAGREED
He also disagreed that the Norwegian had been compelled to plead guilty and he knew the consequences of making a guilty plea.
In court, Corneliussen kept his head bowed and stayed silent.
In his own affidavit, he said the accounts of Mr Ayub and Mr Roslan were not available when he made his plea, hence raising "serious doubt" on the conviction.
"I was given a harsh sentence by the district judge on the basis that there was a 'sustained and brutal' attack by reason of the alleged slap, which Mr Mohamed and Mr Roslan say I did not do," he added.
As a result of the case, Corneliussen said he lost his job as a DHL director and had been in jail for about six weeks.
He had also met Mr Chan and paid him $30,000 in compensation and as a gesture of goodwill.
Corneliussen, who has an Indonesian wife living in Bali and a son and daughter based in Norway, said in his affidavit: "Mr Chan has profited from his dishonesty."
Both sides agreed to the $5,000 bail, which was put up by Corneliussen's former DHL colleague, Mr Steve Whorf, who was present during the hearing, along with another friend of Corneliussen's and representatives from the Norwegian Embassy.
Mr Whorf told The New Paper: "It means a lot to us now that the case is back in court. I am very impressed that these two new witnesses came out of the blue to testify."
He went to receive his friend outside Admiralty West Prison when a visibly happy Corneliussen was released at 6pm yesterday.
Said Mr Whorf: "There'll probably be a barbecue after this."
The case will be heard again in court at a later date.
WHAT WAS SAID IN COURT EARLIER
The incident occurred in Boat Quay, at the intersection of Circular Road and North Canal Road, at around 1am on Sept 22.
Earlier hearings included the testimonies of taxi driver Chan Chuan Heng, 46, and two witnesses, taxi driver Choithramani Chandrul Bhaqwandas, 45, and senior operations supervisor Muhd Fairuz Jumahat, 28.
According to the statement of facts:
- The altercation started when a drunk Arne Corneliussen tried to enter the parked taxi after Mr Chan told him that he was about to go for a toilet break.
- Corneliussen responded by slapping the cabby. Incensed, Mr Chan said: "What the f***, why you hit me?"
- Corneliussen then charged towards the cabby, chasing him as he ran away. He stopped and returned to the taxi before charging towards Mr Chan again.
- Mr Chan fell to the ground while running away. Corneliussen caught up with him and pinned him down.
- Corneliussen used one of his arms to choke the victim from behind for about 15 seconds.
WHAT NEW WITNESSES SAY
Mr Mohamed Ayub Shaik Dawood, who works at Fullerton Hotel, and his friend, Mr Roslan Zainal, were walking towards Boat Quay to get a taxi when they allegedly saw the altercation.
They left the scene when they thought the altercation had ended.
- The confrontation was over the taxi fare, and Arne Corneliussen was allegedly heard shouting: "Why so expensive? You cheat me?"
- Cabby Chan Chuan Heng responded by loudly telling the Norwegian to "f*** off". Corneliussen later testified that Mr Chan was trying to charge a flat fare instead of using the taxi meter.
- Mr Chan then allegedly punched Corneliussen in the head, who squatted down. Corneliussen appeared to be dazed and later said he felt pain on the left side of his head.
- Mr Chan entered the taxi and Corneliussen popped his head into the taxi and shouted, "Why do you want to run?" Mr Chan then left the cab and ran away when he saw Corneliussen moving towards him.
- Mr Chan tripped and fell three times, moving unsteadily after each fall. Corneliussen stopped chasing each time until the last when he pinned down Mr Chan to restrain him.
- Corneliussen was not choking Mr Chan, who was panting and out of breath.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had Mr Mohamed Ayub Shaik Dawood and Mr Roslan Zainal kept silent, no one would be any the wiser.

But speak out they did.

The colleagues at The Fullerton Hotel righted an injustice they had first noticed in a newspaper report - they became key witnesses in a retrial of Norwegian Arne Corneliussen, 52, who was originally sentenced to 10 weeks in jail for assaulting Singaporean cabbie Chan Chuan Heng, 47, at Boat Quay.

 

Their testimony helped quash Mr Corneliussen's guilty plea and conviction midway through his jail term - a rare occurrence.

They went on to help the courts convict Chan, who Mr Ayub, 56, and Mr Roslan, 47, said had started the altercation on the night of the incident in September 2014.

Last Thursday evening, the two men met a grateful Mr Corneliussen for the first time outside of a courtroom at the Boat Quay spot almost 21/2 years after the incident.

It was an idea mooted by Mr Corneliussen after his retrial last year.

The men embraced and recounted the incident as Mr Corneliussen thanked them for stepping forward.

"One thing is clear and that is there are still good people in this world. I will always remember these two kind souls," said the Singapore permanent resident.

The next day, Chan was found guilty of providing false information with intent to cause a public servant to use his lawful power to injure another person.

He was also guilty of a second charge of voluntarily causing hurt to Mr Corneliussen.

His sentence will be pronounced at a later date, the court heard.

It was Chan's account in a newspaper report which compelled Mr Ayub to act.

He initially had no idea the police were involved as he and Mr Roslan had left the scene early.

He called Mr Roslan at once to verify that he had not imagined things.

Said Mr Ayub: "I thought that this report was not right at all, and Roslan said he was sure what he saw that night was no mistake.

"But I did not know what to do with the information."

Mr Ayub's first efforts to seek justice for Mr Corneliussen fell through the cracks.

He called some newspapers and, when that went nowhere, he made a police report.

The court heard that when he did not get a response from the police, he did not give up.

Said Mr Ayub: "I know a Rajah & Tann lawyer who likes to park near our workplace, so one day I went up to him, told him the story and asked him what I can do to help."

The lawyer eventually referred them to Mr Corneliussen's defence counsel, Mr Terence Seah from Virtus Law, who got the retrial going.

Mr Roslan was willing to testify, pointing out: "We have to say something, if not it is very unfair."

Mr Corneliussen was eventually found guilty in his retrial of a lesser charge of causing hurt to Chan and was fined $2,000, but did not have to serve additional jail time.

Mr Corneliussen is thankful.

"Were it not for Ayub and Roslan, I wouldn't even be at this stage today," he said.

Still, despite feeling vindicated, Mr Corneliussen has not had a rosy time since his 2015 retrial.

He was sacked from a high-paying job as a programme management director for logistics firm DHL.

He has been estranged from his Indonesian wife of four years.

And for two years, he was unable to find a job.

So he started his own consulting firm.

But Mr Corneliussen remains positive about life. "When life kicks you down, you stand up again. There is always something good coming."

- See more at: http://news.asiaone.com/news/singapore/norwegian-meets-his-2-samaritans-first-time

 

Finally we know why these 2 witnesses seemed to "suddenly appear".

 

Knn. Our police sleeping on the job again.

 

Luckily these 2 chaps did not give up and went out of their way to make sure the truth was told  [thumbsup]

Edited by Kusje
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...