Aerosmith 2nd Gear February 8, 2015 Share February 8, 2015 did LTA suddenly change PARF rebate rule. if i remember correctly two years ago, i read somewhere that says parf rebate for cars registered before 2008 above 9 years old but below 10 years old have 55% parf rebate. why now i check on website it is 50% only? who stole that 5% ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kangadrool Supersonic February 8, 2015 Share February 8, 2015 reduce liao mah... I am not surprised some people will be caught by surprise that when the day the scrap their cars, they don't even get a single cent back. All thanks to so called CEV rebates. On 2/8/2015 at 2:16 PM, Aerosmith said: did LTA suddenly change PARF rebate rule. if i remember correctly two years ago, i read somewhere that says parf rebate for cars registered before 2008 above 9 years old but below 10 years old have 55% parf rebate. why now i check on website it is 50% only? who stole that 5% 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
t0y0ta Supercharged February 8, 2015 Share February 8, 2015 (edited) On 2/8/2015 at 2:16 PM, Aerosmith said: did LTA suddenly change PARF rebate rule. if i remember correctly two years ago, i read somewhere that says parf rebate for cars registered before 2008 above 9 years old but below 10 years old have 55% parf rebate. why now i check on website it is 50% only? who stole that 5% I think you are confused between OMV and ARF value. Last year (9 yr -> scrap) Min PARF rebate for cars registered from May 2002 onwards will get 50% of ARF value. For cars registered before Feb 2008, the ARF value was 110% of OMV, thus 50% of ARF = 55% of OMV Cars registered after Feb 2008 ARF value of 100% of OMV, thus 50% of ARF = 50% of OMV. Reference: http://www.lta.gov.sg/content/ltaweb/en/roads-and-motoring/owning-a-vehicle/costs-of-owning-a-vehicle/tax-structure-for-cars.html Edited February 8, 2015 by t0y0ta 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosmith 2nd Gear February 8, 2015 Author Share February 8, 2015 On 2/8/2015 at 2:28 PM, t0y0ta said: I think you are confused between OMV and ARF value. Last year (9 yr -> scrap) Min PARF rebate for cars registered from May 2002 onwards will get 50% of ARF value. For cars registered before Feb 2008, the ARF value was 110% of OMV, thus 50% of ARF = 55% of OMV Cars registered after Feb 2008 ARF value of 100% of OMV, thus 50% of ARF = 50% of OMV. Reference: http://www.lta.gov.sg/content/ltaweb/en/roads-and-motoring/owning-a-vehicle/costs-of-owning-a-vehicle/tax-structure-for-cars.html thanks man for the clarification. cause i all along thought those before 2008 is 55% of OMV. lucky is a misconception, it is still 55%. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vhtfhwlego Supercharged February 9, 2015 Share February 9, 2015 On 2/8/2015 at 2:19 PM, Kangadrool said: reduce liao mah... I am not surprised some people will be caught by surprise that when the day the scrap their cars, they don't even get a single cent back. All thanks to so called CEV rebates. got minimum $2500. If OMV is $10,000 while CEV is $20,000. It suppose to be $10,000 LESS $ 20,000 = -$10,000 No such thing for LTA to give rebate on green cars as they said, there was be minimum $ 5000 charge on ARF. So even your CEV is $20,000, the ARF would be S$ 5000. ARF $5k X 50% = S$2.5k. So actual CEV discount is $5k less Parf differences = S$2.5k. you think LTA really giving money? 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hosaybo 6th Gear February 9, 2015 Share February 9, 2015 Aiya...gov way to kill 2 birds. Going green and reducing the overall price of car to make it playable for people. Like vezel, think new price is abt 110k and got high cevs. Scrap value at 10 year is low. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spring Moderator February 9, 2015 Share February 9, 2015 This CEVS rebate is actually a good thing. What is not good is the implementation cos as usual LTA wants to make it easy for themselves so they give this rebate by offsetting against the ARF/COE and other registration fees and as usual those opportunistic ADs conveniently package it into the new car price but us buyers don't get the full rebate. LTA should either refund the CEVS rebate to buyers directly or some other way but admittedly it's administratively harder for them. What was a good intention has again been taken advantage of by opportunists and as usual we buyers end up losing out ↡ Advertisement 10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
LTA - how to improve roads ah?
LTA - how to improve roads ah?
3 years lock in period for vehicles registered from Feb 19 as business-owned private-hire cars, says LTA
3 years lock in period for vehicles registered from Feb 19 as business-owned private-hire cars, says LTA
LTA buys electric buses from China
LTA buys electric buses from China
LTA tweaks calculation of commercial vehicle COE quota to even out supply
LTA tweaks calculation of commercial vehicle COE quota to even out supply
New stations, line extensions planned for Singapore’s MRT
New stations, line extensions planned for Singapore’s MRT
Singapore Reckless Drivers Part Xvi
Singapore Reckless Drivers Part Xvi
Man who evaded taxes on over 1,800 imported vehicles gets jail in default of S$6 million fine
Man who evaded taxes on over 1,800 imported vehicles gets jail in default of S$6 million fine
LTA seeks ideas to remove burnt electric buses from multi-storey bus depots
LTA seeks ideas to remove burnt electric buses from multi-storey bus depots