Jump to content

Paris Terror Attacks, Satire cartoon crew killed.


Pocus
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

Satan condems any act of violence carried out in his name.

 

However I don't know of any terrorists act carried out in the name of Satan.

 

Its always the other religions so they will need to speak up if they think

 

these acts of terrorism is not inline with their beliefs. Sadly the opposite

 

is happening, some people are quietly happy and others are signing up

 

and flying to the middle east to support their brothers and sisters in arms.

 

:D

 

Satan works in insidious ways [:p]

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm looking at all the mass gatherings and showings of solidarity around the world in protest of this attack.

 

All i'm thinking is terrorists would have a field day with that many people in one location.

 

Like the plot used in the movie "The Kingdom"

 

1st a suicide bomber and once crowd gathers and recovery of the wounded is attempted, an ambulance is driven in and detonated

Link to post
Share on other sites

People who say the cartoonist deserved it are missing the point.

 

What next?

The world is round. Not flat.

Theory of evolution.

Atheism.

Secularism.

Democracy not theocracy.

Alcohol consumption.

Divorce.

Abortion.

Woman's rights.

Contraception.

Even Harry potter books

Etc etc. .

 

Every fxxking idea, thing, concept we take for granted is opposed by some fxxking religious nut. Are you going to give it up to please them cos it offends their religious sensitivities? ?

 

The very idiots who say they are offended by others will often have no problem going around saying the most offensive things to people who don't subscribe to their religion.

And they will find passages on their respective religious text to support it.

Will they delete their religious text? ?

 

And to be clear. this kind of behavior isn't limited to Muslims.

 

The solution to these terrorist is not appeasement, it's termination.

The moment they dictate how others live, it's over.

  • Praise 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The solution to these terrorist is not appeasement, it's termination.

The moment they dictate how others live, it's over.

 

Even if you had this 'termination' thing going for say the last 100 years do you really think things would be better or this last outrage not have happened.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

People who say the cartoonist deserved it are missing the point.

 

What next?

The world is round. Not flat.

Theory of evolution.

Atheism.

Secularism.

Democracy not theocracy.

Alcohol consumption.

Divorce.

Abortion.

Woman's rights.

Contraception.

Even Harry potter books

Etc etc. .

 

Girls going to school.

Men must have beards.

 

:D

  • Praise 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm against the violence and killing of innocents in Paris. But these cartoonists had it coming. They are not just insulting terrorist but also the religion. Before free speech, they have to learn to have respect for others. If someone has expressed their wish not to be mocked and disturbed, please respect that.

 

It's like an obese person repeatedly tells the bullies that he does not like to be mocked. Bullies exercising their free speech continue to mock. And when the obsese guy threatened retaliation, the bullies challenge him further by increasing the intensity of mockery. Either the obese suffered in silence, or he retaliate. You see these bullies or cartoonist has no respect for the others, and thus will never stop what they are doing even if you plea or threatened. It doesn't matter if the obsese guy is insecure of himself, as long as he is affected by the mockery and express his wish not to be mocked, I say we respect that wish.

Edited by Ender
  • Praise 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

People talk about each others' mothers or family already can get into fights, what more making fun of other people's religion?

 

I saw the satirical drawings and they were pretty disrespectful. As another MCFer said, freedom of speech does come with responsibility.

The punishment can't be death by AK47, right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blame the chao ang moh first for making fun of religion.

 

 

What have our world become of now?!
Everyday kill here and there...
Shouldn't practicing the correct religion help one to become kinder and caring? If you really love your proclaimed GOD, shouldn't the scriptures teach you the correct way of peace?!

Only the corrupted brains of mankind tweated the true meaning of the scriptures and make oneself a terrorist to kill another human being....

Hope they can surrender themselves and get back to the true kind mankind that the scriptures is preaching ...

 

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Free speech yes but a responsible one please.

 

Not anyhow shoot from the mouth.

If I said something bad towards someone family members,Kn---------- etc;

Is this consider as free speech?

 

To some it might be free,and some might feel offended.

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

People who say the cartoonist deserved it are missing the point.

 

What next?

The world is round. Not flat.

Theory of evolution.

Atheism.

Secularism.

Democracy not theocracy.

Alcohol consumption.

Divorce.

Abortion.

Woman's rights.

Contraception.

Even Harry potter books

Etc etc. .

 

Every fxxking idea, thing, concept we take for granted is opposed by some fxxking religious nut. Are you going to give it up to please them cos it offends their religious sensitivities? ?

 

The very idiots who say they are offended by others will often have no problem going around saying the most offensive things to people who don't subscribe to their religion.

And they will find passages on their respective religious text to support it.

Will they delete their religious text? ?

 

And to be clear. this kind of behavior isn't limited to Muslims.

 

The solution to these terrorist is not appeasement, it's termination.

The moment they dictate how others live, it's over.

 

Most likely they are not religious in the true sense of the word but using religion as a front / excuse to 'legistimise' their barbaric acts of violence / killings [mad] :angry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

I'm against the violence and killing of innocents in Paris. But these cartoonists had it coming. They are not just insulting terrorist but also the religion. Before free speech, they have to learn to have respect for others. If someone has expressed their wish not to be mocked and disturbed, please respect that.

 

It's like an obese person repeatedly tells the bullies that he does not like to be mocked. Bullies exercising their free speech continue to mock. And when the obsese guy threatened retaliation, the bullies challenge him further by increasing the intensity of mockery. Either the obese suffered in silence, or he retaliate. You see these bullies or cartoonist has no respect for the others, and thus will never stop what they are doing even if you plea or threatened. It doesn't matter if the obsese guy is insecure of himself, as long as he is affected by the mockery and express his wish not to be mocked, I say we respect that wish.

 

Most respectable, responsible organisations / groups dont really go around insulting others as their main activities, unlike this cartoonist group which seems to do just that as if this is the main reason for its existence.

 

The victims have a few choices in response to such insults:-

 

- Ignore them and go on with life (there's a difference between being insulted by say Xi Jin Pin / Obama or some nobody or a group like these cartoonists who are really not to be taken seriously)

 

- Retaliate in similar manners (eg using cartoons etc)

 

- Retaliate in extreme manners (eg violence / killings)

 

The killers in this case had choosen the last option but it cant be ruled out that being terrorists, they simply have to do something with the slightest excuses to terrorise the world and these cartoonists had given them an excuse which is more than just the "slightest".

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

 

Satan condems any act of violence carried out in his name.

 

However I don't know of any terrorists act carried out in the name of Satan.

 

Its always the other religions so they will need to speak up if they think

 

these acts of terrorism is not inline with their beliefs. Sadly the opposite

 

is happening, some people are quietly happy and others are signing up

 

and flying to the middle east to support their brothers and sisters in arms.

 

:D

 

I am very 'scared' of you.... LOL [sweatdrop] [sweatdrop] [sweatdrop]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Free speech yes but a responsible one please.

 

Not anyhow shoot from the mouth.

If I said something bad towards someone family members,Kn---------- etc;

Is this consider as free speech?

 

To some it might be free,and some might feel offended.

If someone now finds some parts of the Quran very offensive, then they also have the right to call for it to be banned? ?

 

Failing which they can go kill people or blow up mosques? ???

 

Or is this a one way street.

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am very 'scared' of you.... LOL [sweatdrop] [sweatdrop] [sweatdrop]

 

 

Haha I will make you do evil things, drink beer - the ginger kind, listen to

 

the devil's music - Girl's generation and listen to dirty jokes.

 

Which religion teaches fun, laughter and happiness?

 

You only get this with Satan.

 

:D

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

 

I've often heard outraged people in the US express these very sentiments online ever since 9/11. But the fact is: it doesn't really work that way. For one thing, there already *are* moderate Muslims who very eloquently express their disapproval of terrorist acts done in the name of their faith (or any other). For another, the real majority - the White Christian majority - don't hold themselves to the same standard. For example, when a White supremacist terrorist went on a killing rampage in a Sikh temple in Wisconsin (yes, he apparently knew they were Sikhs and not Muslims), I don't recall there being *any* call for the "majority" of Whites in the US to come out and strongly denounce this act. Nor did any such mass abjuration actually occur spontaneously.

 

Not all believers of the religion they proclaim are true believers who actually practise what the religion really teaches them, sad but true. For example, killing is wrong yet many believers kill others.

 

When someone (eg a terrorist) uses a religion as a front for his violent acts, moderate members of the religion do verbally respond with disapproval but unfortunately the majority members dont / cant actually follow up with effective actions / measures based on the verbal disapproval. The terrorists know this too well and continue to 'defy' such disapprovals. This gives the impression (rightly or wrongly) that the majority members are either indifferent or feel there is not much else they can do, beyond giving silent support to the verbal disapproval, to contain the terrorists. [:(]

Edited by Super7
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...