Jump to content

Singtel to charge for whatsapp and skype?


Little_prince
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

no such thing as bo pian.

 

boycott to the end

 

i rather watch from websites at low resolution than to pay a cent to ST

 

I'm with you, I watch lousy stream for F1 till starhub got it back! BOO TO ST!

I'm very unhappy with this news.

 

Its like LTA wants to Up ERP Charges, SMRT and SBS want to Increase the fares, Taxi companies wants to Up Step Up fares going to Orchard Road, Because Tangs outlet Krispy Kreme Donuts are doing extremely well and these Transport regulator and companies want get Profit from commuters because of this.

 

When business is good, landlord up the rent, this is how things works, but they don't know tenant will retaliate back with "close shop" and change location, end up all customer go to other location as well... They end up losing traffic volume...

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Starhub also offer a no data plan and also a share plan (with you own number)

 

My nephew using the Stinkytell share plan - got shared number, blardy annoying

 

 

Redpac is a standalone line only the call time and sms are shared, if you are on a higher plan but not utilized them most of the time, can share with them as their usage usually not much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12GB drop to 2-3GB. Excess 1GB from 5$ increase to $10.70. (Charged extra $40 for 4GB <_<). Data roaming too expensive. Want 4G, only got 3G. 3G speed still cmi. [thumbsdown] Miotv nothing to watch(for me). And now still wants to charge for Whatsapp/Skype? Really Stinktel? [mad]

Link to post
Share on other sites

haven't paid a single cent to Singtel for more than 10 years already since i terminated my home land line

 

but keep collecting dividends from the discounted singtel shares held in cpf

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue of telecom/cable infrastructure companies not able to monetise the growth in app usage is across the world.

 

More recently in the US, you had Netflix (which had been resisting efforts by cable companies to get them to pay for the cable usage that their customers use) finally capitulated and has reached an agreement with Comcast.

 

This agreement means that Netflix customers are not throttled when using that service. Now whether Netflix will pass the cost to the customer remains to be seen.

 

Same thing with AT&T, Verizon when accessing through 4G.

 

Its happening already in the US where there's a lot of discussion and lobbyist so it can happen easily over here as well.

 

Thats why the below youtube link showing the pCell demonstration is fcking awesome as far as I'm concerned.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bO0tjAdOIw

 

its a personal cell tower :D

Edited by ins1dious
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the main reason why ST is targeting particularly Whatapp and Skype is because these OTT services are EATING THEIR LUNCH.

 

If they target specifically those data hogging apps it would be much easier to stomach.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the main reason why ST is targeting particularly Whatapp and Skype is because these OTT services are EATING THEIR LUNCH.

 

If they target specifically those data hogging apps it would be much easier to stomach.

 

The Netflix is a direct example. Movie watching habits is moving away from Comcast which provides TV and internet services so Comcast loses revenue from their paid TV. Thats why they started throttling Netflix.

 

AT&T, Verizon outright stopped FaceTime, Google Hangouts from working over 4G cos that's eating into their voice / long distance calling revenue.

 

The cable/internet companies don't want to be dumb pipe anymore. But that's what they are. Just another utility like water, gas and electricity. I hope we, the customer, don't get shafted cos they're missing their money.

Edited by ins1dious
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Netflix is a direct example. Movie watching habits is moving away from Comcast which provides TV and internet services so Comcast loses revenue from their paid TV. Thats why they started throttling Netflix.

 

AT&T, Verizon outright stopped FaceTime, Google Hangouts from working over 4G cos that's eating into their voice / long distance calling revenue.

 

The cable/internet companies don't want to be dumb pipe anymore. But that's what they are. Just another utility like water, gas and electricity. I hope we, the customer, don't get shafted cos they're missing their money.

 

Exactly! It should NOT be because of loss of revenue they can just decide to charge or cut off certain 3rd-party services.

 

Data service is a basic utility just like water and electricity, the govt should step in to regulate this and disallow such uncompetitive behaviour.

 

I for one actually supported that they cut down on data packages to penalise data hoggers. If you want to use more just pay more and not expect light users to subsidize heavy users.

 

But now they choose to go down this route...

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's actually a common issue amongst ISPs worldwide, not only SingTel.

What I heard is that some have banded together, to fund R&D on OTT blockers and are seeing some positive results.

If OTT blockers are deemed fit-for-purpose, and implemented in all physical land or cable line networks, the all OTT Apps will either be stopped dead in their tracks (cannot "use wi-fi" to circumvent 3G/4G anymore), or these OTT App proprietors will need to pay some form of throughputting or usage fee to the ISPs, or enter into a JV contract with the ISPs.

The future looks real and clear, as the ISPs are beginning to speak with one voice around the world!

 

The OTT blockers will be obsolete the day they release it.

Next day, some other apps developer will come out with another way to circumvent it. Eg, if it was hard coded to recognise the message headers, the apps developers just need to rewrite this portion. Or if they block the IP/hostname, the developers just change it.

People come out with such useful apps because they believe in innovating, and also sick of the Telco's unreasonable pricing.

 

Before 97 or 98, SMS was offered unlimited and free for those who had forgotten or did not know.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

can't help but think that many heavyweight STI index stocks are not going to perform well in near future?

 

Singtel - voice calls and sms demand slow down

 

SMRT - maintenance cost eating into their revenue

 

SGX - day trading volume declining fast

 

maybe only ST Eng will do better since there will be more money in national defense budget

  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha, you have yet to consider msg sent to non-local numbers.

 

This is an interesting discussion. I can see from ISPs' POV, simple I want more money and I'm not getting any money from whatsapp, wechat etc.

 

First, they don't use ISP servers to host because they have their own, except they may have subscript to a single ISP for using the bandwidth so whatsapp is already paying for bandwidth.

 

ISP or rather those in mobile / internet biz will lose on their SMS and MMS subscriptions. This is what they are worried about not the use of their bandwidth, it is just a silly excuse to charge whatsapp.

 

If people still use whatsapp, nobody will exceed the "free" SMSes given to them then it would not be profitable for them to keep the service. Just imagine, paying say $39 per month with 200 "free" SMSes,, 1GB of data (4G). If whatsapp data is only say about 2kb per mesg, it would be almost equivalent to 500,000 over "free" SMSes... comparing to their 1 excess SMS cost $0.0535 they would have lost $26,750 per subscribers, of course the ISP will be "red-eyes"... hahaaa

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway it's between the app operators and the carriers/network providers.

 

"If you want to use my servers and the lan line that I've laid, you will have to pay."

 

I think end users will be least affected coz between carriers there's still the ongoing price wars. End of the day carriers will make more moola. Those who want to download the app will probably have to pay.

 

Like that I also want to bill Mediacock, Stinktel, Starhub and M1 for having their radio and mobile signals passing through (intruding) my home without my permission. They must pay me rental for passing through my private property. This is a big revenue loss to me as I wasn't able to tap on this to charge them while they make excessive profits.

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's put the case of the disgruntled ISPs another way ... To see their POV.

 

If you were to have paid millions to live in a condominium and you later observe that many not staying there, but at nearby HDB estates come to your condo to park there, use the pool and other facilities, and then wash themselves up in the common showers ... maybe even the sauna etc. - every evening, and it gets especially congested over weekends.

 

How would you feel - after having paid millions for the exclusivity to live there? Will you let it go ... business as usual?

 

No right. You and the rest of the condo proprietors will do something immediately!

Maybe issue a owner/tenant/occupier card and instruct the security guards to police this unconditionally.

 

Now, aren't the ISPs, Singtel in this case, also doing the same thing to protect their invested assets and business case?

 

I guess it only hurts you most, if it's yours.

 

the analogy is slightly flawed.

In this case, the HDB fellas actually paid for parking lots in the condos.

But Instead of using the condo sauna (which charges a separate fee), the HDB fellas got smart and decided to use their cars parked in the sun as saunas instead. [laugh]

 

so the condo management now says we'll charge you for using you cars as saunas

 

edited to add singtel can go and die. A pest in the market, since the world cup debacle. Better off if it disappeared altogether.

Edited by Karoon
  • Praise 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Wah, your idea later kena taken into consideration....... [sweatdrop][laugh]

 

In the early 2000s, they have already been thinking of doing it, just that it's not easy to implement.

If your company has branches overseas, just point all local mails to use the overseas server via VPN tunnel, easily bypass local restrictions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technology merging is inevitable.

 

Voice, data, text and even video is going to merge.

And they all go into a data stream, be it fibre, cable, wireless or cellular.

 

Service provider can either innovate, jump on the bandwagon first or kpkb to authorities to protect them.

 

When you do the last, you're anti-competition.

 

Imagine a new video service come along and provide high QOS, streaming HD video for free or sells by advert. What does sinktel and sh do ?

 

Complain, block service or charge people when they are already selling bandwidth ?

 

You're right - convergence.

That is why they are so eager to reduce the data plan. You think they're so good, give you seamless surfing?

Go tell them the reception is poor at your area, see if they will be so eager to resolve it, especially underground carparks.

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

here are 3 alternatives to WhatsApp you can consider:




1. Viber

These guys are clearly doing something right. Recently acquired by the Japanese giant Rakuten for $900 million, this Internet messaging and calling service has grown despite the incumbent success of Skype and WhatsApp. Boasting 300 million users worldwide, Viber has features similar to Skype.


Interestingly enough, the announcement of the acquisition caused the share price of Rakuten to drop by 9.5%, which was the same effect that the WhatsApp acquisition had on Facebook stocks (dropping by 5%).


Key Features:


  • Messaging, calling, and photo sharing features (free of course, apart from data usage)
  • Group chat functions (similar to WhatsApp)
  • Available for Windows Phone, iOS, Android, and Blackberry platforms
  • Desktop app also available

From personal experience, we’ve had much better connection stability when making overseas phone calls with Viber compared to Skype, but of course connectivity may vary between users.




2. Telegram

This previously unknown app shot to the top of the Apple Store charts in 48 countries within a matter of days! It was reported that it hit 5 million new user signups within a day during WhatsApp’s downtime.


Originally launched as an application to provide a means of communication that could not be accessed by Russian intelligence agencies (what?!), this app prides itself on its security and independence. In fact, it makes many bold claims (such as that they’ll never sell out) on their webpage.


Key Features:


  • Ability to create message threads that self-delete (similar to SnapChat)
  • Cloud functionality that lets users access chats and shared media via any Internet-connected device
  • End-to-end encryption that makes it one of the safest messaging platforms available now (something that Blackberry had been trying to promote with BBM. We all know how that turned out for them)



3. Wechat

Wechat has developed something of a dubious stigma recently, with Asiaone running an article on how the platform is increasingly being used by people to initiate affairs. So much for protesting against Ashley Madison. Owned by Tencent Inc., China’s largest Internet service portal, the application is a casual,almost funny communication app that has features such as “Drift Bottle” and “Shake.”


Key Features:


  • Messaging, group chat, and video call functions
  • Shake – just shake your phone and you’ll be able to see other people shaking their phones in an area around you. Weird way to meet a stranger but hey, what do we know?
  • Look Around – this is just a location based function that allows you to see other people in the area who use Wechat as well.
  • Drift Bottle – this has to be the funniest feature of them all. It basically allows you to send out a voice or text message and then see who picks it up. The website says “Select ‘Pick’ to pick a drift bottle from the sea. You can reply to it or throw it back to the sea. Sometimes you may get a starfish. Just try again.” - WHAT??


Notable Mention:


Line Messenger – Japan’s biggest messaging app has to be the cutest communications app on earth. Just check out their webpage and you’ll see what we mean. Prepare for lots of stickers, cartoon characters and animations. One minor annoying part is they tend to send you weird marketing SMSes.


↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...