Mcf777 Turbocharged April 3, 2014 Share April 3, 2014 He was on drugs. If without drugs, our govt very good one. Fine or suspen license only. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caravan 5th Gear April 3, 2014 Share April 3, 2014 185km/h, driving while under 10 years ban. Wonder what previous incident warrant a 10 year ban. Incorrigible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jman888 Moderator April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 He was on drugs. If without drugs, our govt very good one. Fine or suspen license only. with drug (medicine that cause drowsiness) got better excuse right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 how come the farker no paralysed for life car catch fire, burn until disfigured kuku brid drop out Fatal CTE crash-driver could face charge of causing death by dangerous driving The 34-year-old man who allegedly killed a trainee pilot, his Korean girlfriend and her parents in a CTE crash last August is due to appear in court on Friday. He could face charges of causing death by dangerous driving and driving under the influence of drugs. Police said in a media statement on Thursday that the unnamed driver's licence had been suspended since Aug 9, the day of the accident, and that the suspension will remain in force until the outcome of his case in court. Mr Amron Ayoub, 23, was driving his girlfriend Jamie Song Jisoo, 24, her brother and her parents to the airport before 4am last National Day when they had a flat tyre along the Central Expressway. They had pulled up at a chevron area near the Yio Chu Kang exit and all of them got out, when an MPV hit them from behind, killing Ms Song and her parents instantly. Her brother was unhurt as he was standing by the side of the road. Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/fatal-cte-crash-driver-could-face-charge-causing-death-dangerous-drivi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuPerBoRed Twincharged April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 with drug (medicine that cause drowsiness) got better excuse right? ai.. if he was under medication.. it will become mitigating factor and no longer a chargeable offence ma... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watwheels Supersonic April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 Fatal CTE crash-driver could face charge of causing death by dangerous driving The 34-year-old man who allegedly killed a trainee pilot, his Korean girlfriend and her parents in a CTE crash last August is due to appear in court on Friday. He could face charges of causing death by dangerous driving and driving under the influence of drugs. Police said in a media statement on Thursday that the unnamed driver's licence had been suspended since Aug 9, the day of the accident, and that the suspension will remain in force until the outcome of his case in court. Mr Amron Ayoub, 23, was driving his girlfriend Jamie Song Jisoo, 24, her brother and her parents to the airport before 4am last National Day when they had a flat tyre along the Central Expressway. They had pulled up at a chevron area near the Yio Chu Kang exit and all of them got out, when an MPV hit them from behind, killing Ms Song and her parents instantly. Her brother was unhurt as he was standing by the side of the road. Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/fatal-cte-crash-driver-could-face-charge-causing-death-dangerous-drivi Actually why is his identity being withheld? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strat 6th Gear April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 Actually why is his identity being withheld? good question.. most likely is related to some elite ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mockngbrd Supersonic April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 They should just charge him with homicide Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knoobie Supercharged April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 (edited) with drug (medicine that cause drowsiness) got better excuse right? that is what I thought too.. when MSM mentioned drugs, people automatically think is those "ecstasy, ketamine" kind of thing.. after all, it was not reported that he took controlled drugs.. medicine can be drugs too and you shouldn't drive while taking a medicine that causes drowsiness.. otherwise, you also could be charged with DUI.. my understanding from doctor is some flu medicine although stated "non-drowsiness", some people take already also will feel drowsy.. ai.. if he was under medication.. it will become mitigating factor and no longer a chargeable offence ma... some medicine stated clearly that will cause drowsiness.. do not drive or operate machinery.. Edited April 4, 2014 by Knoobie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watwheels Supersonic April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 with drug (medicine that cause drowsiness) got better excuse right? What you are talking is prescribed drugs. But the description is vague. It could be he bought the drugs w/o a doctor's prescription. Only the police know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lala81 Hypersonic April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/driver-charged-over-cte/1058384.html Wow, the charge of driving under influence of drugs is only 6 months/$5k fine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jman888 Moderator April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/driver-charged-over-cte/1058384.html Wow, the charge of driving under influence of drugs is only 6 months/$5k fine. Dangerous driving 5 years + influence of drug 6 months X 4 dead = 22 years ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lala81 Hypersonic April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 Dangerous driving 5 years + influence of drug 6 months X 4 dead = 22 years ?? nope. the charges can't stack i think He's only dangerous driving 1 count and driving under influence of drugs 1 count. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little_prince Supersonic April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 Dangerous driving 5 years + influence of drug 6 months X 4 dead = 22 years ?? probably multiple charges. DUI is 5 yrs. Pls drug charges seperately. looking at , at least 10 yrs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigerwoods Turbocharged April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 Lock him up for good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lala81 Hypersonic April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 probably multiple charges. DUI is 5 yrs. Pls drug charges seperately. looking at , at least 10 yrs not based on what the CNA report said. think only 5 yrs max + 6 mths Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knoobie Supercharged April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 probably multiple charges. DUI is 5 yrs. Pls drug charges seperately. looking at , at least 10 yrs it's DUI of drugs.. controlled drugs is another thing.. drugs can be form of medication that deems one unfit for driving.. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little_prince Supersonic April 4, 2014 Share April 4, 2014 (edited) not based on what the CNA report said. think only 5 yrs max + 6 mths hmm. i dunno liaoz. seems abt the lighter than drink driving. As asserted by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, these benchmarks are merely neutral starting points for sentencing. Mitigating or aggravating factors; including the individual’s level of alcohol tolerance, the level of danger associated with the offender’s actions, the degree of harm actually caused and the cooperative nature of the offender; would then be taken into account to vary the sentence. As an alternative to fines, a first-time offender may be sentenced to imprisonment for a maximum of 6 months. The mandatory driving ban would take effect from the date of his release from prison. For repeat offenders under s. 67, a fine of between $3,000 and $10,000, or an imprisonment term of up to 12 months is imposed. Under s. 67A of the Road Traffic Act, an enhanced penalty is to be imposed on offenders with at least 2 prior convictions under certain sections of the Act; including those concerning the disqualification or suspension of driving licences, reckless driving, speeding, causing death by reckless driving and drink driving. Additionally, under s. 67A, if an offender with the aforementioned prior convictions caused serious injury or death to another person while drink-driving, the court may also sentence him to caning of up to 6 strokes. Edited April 4, 2014 by Little_prince ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Mother of all PMD PMA PAB thread
Mother of all PMD PMA PAB thread
Accident with step ladder, safety concern
Accident with step ladder, safety concern
Would You Buy a Nissan...
Would You Buy a Nissan...
Singapore tourist causes fatal crash in New Zealand
Singapore tourist causes fatal crash in New Zealand
Car accident advice
Car accident advice
What are your takes towards gals with tattoos?? Let's discus
What are your takes towards gals with tattoos?? Let's discus
Sideswipe Accident Insurance Claim
Sideswipe Accident Insurance Claim
TP speeding cause accident
TP speeding cause accident