Toothiewabbit Supersonic July 1, 2014 Share July 1, 2014 (edited) Sgp Govt should learn from the mistakes of Canada and be rigid to say NO means NO to LGBT's agendas, and should not give them further future licenses to hold any celebration in Hong Lim Park. Yes, they should. But would they? That begets the questions - what is the Gov's real stance, what is the endgame they forsee as these issues come to a head - since they could easily approved these pro-LGBT laws afterall. . Edited July 1, 2014 by Toothiewabbit ↡ Advertisement 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CH_CO 6th Gear July 1, 2014 Share July 1, 2014 (edited) To me it is a subjective thing , similar to a person liking 臭豆腐 vs the many which doesn't , the one which likes would support it but there will always be people which oppose. Do you eat in front of the general public which dislike it , it will affect others negatively? As compared to eating it where it least affects anyone , or will you just do it anyway. The problem is selfish b**tards would just choose to do it anyway. Similar to this request, they only choose what they want to do with disregard for others , so if that is the case , why should the public be agreeable to it in the similar argument? Edited July 1, 2014 by CH_CO 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigerwoods Turbocharged July 1, 2014 Share July 1, 2014 (edited) This is a must watch Youtube video : (a very good explanation starts from 38:12) Edited July 1, 2014 by Tigerwoods 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qpik Supercharged July 1, 2014 Share July 1, 2014 Sgp Govt should learn from the mistakes of Canada and be rigid to say NO means NO to LGBT's agendas, and should not give them further future licenses to hold any celebration in Hong Lim Park. Not just Canada. Look at USA, degeneration of society. IMO, not discriminating but to outright approve same-sex marriage seems to be telling impressionable youngsters that it is normal n okay. Being a parent, I won't want my children to believe that it is norm nor discriminate but to respect individual choice. We can respect individual rights but are they able to respect those who don't agree with their lifestyle? Eg. If a gay employee whose employment is terminated due to performance rather than his sexual inclination will find it hard to believe otherwise. I hv one ex-colleague whose inclination was changed after she broke up w her bfren who was a two-timer. Another colleague fm other dept who is a butch took advantage of the situation n managed to Woo her n influence her. Many of us close to her believes that she was wld still remain "norm" had the butch not step in. Another case was a male fren was taken advantage during a uniformed grp camp. He didn't report as it was a shameful incident to him n we didn't managed to nail the sicko. But, my fren sexual inclination changed. Was it due to the incident, we are not sure.? But, cld it hv been prevent, we like to think so. These 2 incidents led me to doubt whether a person sexual orientation cld b change due to influence rather than natural inclination? Furthermore, as a parent how can I safeguard that my children won't be target to those who feel same sex relationship is okay, norm. Just like how hard the world try to keep children safe from paedophile. It might be far fetched to link both together but bottom line, I would like to know how to keep my children safe and if there is a change in their orientation, was it naturally or a victim of circumstances? 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qpik Supercharged July 1, 2014 Share July 1, 2014 Its not the norm, but it exists. Thats the point of legalising it. Like smoking, its legal but is it normal? Smoking might be legalized but if knowing that it is bad for health n still choose to smoke isn't abt norm but choice. Legal Laws are set by Human, some stuff though legalized might not b gd for us. But, I believe each of us hv the wisdom to know what is gd n hv the ability to choose n not rely entirely on Human Laws. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porker Turbocharged July 1, 2014 Share July 1, 2014 (edited) I remember last time I had a discussion with @Mustank (he is a gentleman btw) on drugs. He expressed concern that drug traffickers should be severely punished because they created the risk that kids will be drawn into drugs. It is ultimately the failure of parents to educate and enlighten their children on what is right and what is wrong. Similarly, I see people bring up the same argument in the LGBT issue. It is your f*cking failure if you fail to educate your kids if you think LBGT is unnatural and wrong. Don't pin it on the government or the west or the popularization of the issue. There are so many wrong things in the world so you guys wanna pin all the blame on that and absolve your responsibilities? Edited July 1, 2014 by Porker 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
2BDriver Hypersonic July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 I remember last time I had a discussion with @Mustank (he is a gentleman btw) on drugs. He expressed concern that drug traffickers should be severely punished because they created the risk that kids will be drawn into drugs. It is ultimately the failure of parents to educate and enlighten their children on what is right and what is wrong. Similarly, I see people bring up the same argument in the LGBT issue. It is your f*cking failure if you fail to educate your kids if you think LBGT is unnatural and wrong. Don't pin it on the government or the west or the popularization of the issue. There are so many wrong things in the world so you guys wanna pin all the blame on that and absolve your responsibilities? When we were having our lunch at Hougang 1 food court, 2 couples came by and sat on next table speaking loudly about their child been overly punished by the teacher, principal and the whole school for stealing offence in the classroom. I told my wife to have a good look of these 4 faces and forever remember what they'd said about their child stealing offence in school, my wife was curious and asked me why ? I explained to her, this is how idiots look like, go tell our daughter what we've heard of these parents arguments and complains, so that she'll be aware of the right way to nurture our grand children. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porker Turbocharged July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 When we were having our lunch at Hougang 1 food court, 2 couples came by and sat on next table speaking loudly about their child been overly punished by the teacher, principal and the whole school for stealing offence in the classroom. I told my wife to have a good look of these 4 faces and forever remember what they'd said about their child stealing offence in school, my wife was curious and asked me why ? I explained to her, this is how idiots look like, go tell our daughter what we've heard of these parents arguments and complains, so that she'll be aware of the right way to nurture our grand children. Wah you say they idiot in front of them. Got fight or not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
2BDriver Hypersonic July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 Wah you say they idiot in front of them. Got fight or not? Unlike them, we spoke softly............. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigerwoods Turbocharged July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 I remember last time I had a discussion with @Mustank (he is a gentleman btw) on drugs. He expressed concern that drug traffickers should be severely punished because they created the risk that kids will be drawn into drugs. It is ultimately the failure of parents to educate and enlighten their children on what is right and what is wrong. Similarly, I see people bring up the same argument in the LGBT issue. It is your f*cking failure if you fail to educate your kids if you think LBGT is unnatural and wrong. Don't pin it on the government or the west or the popularization of the issue. There are so many wrong things in the world so you guys wanna pin all the blame on that and absolve your responsibilities? Totally agree with the sentence in RED Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porker Turbocharged July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 Totally agree with the sentence in RED Deh when you hole in one? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigerwoods Turbocharged July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 Deh when you hole in one? last time have many holes I wan. now only 1 authorised one, all others are rejected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1fast1 Supersonic July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 I remember last time I had a discussion with @Mustank (he is a gentleman btw) on drugs. He expressed concern that drug traffickers should be severely punished because they created the risk that kids will be drawn into drugs. It is ultimately the failure of parents to educate and enlighten their children on what is right and what is wrong. Similarly, I see people bring up the same argument in the LGBT issue. It is your f*cking failure if you fail to educate your kids if you think LBGT is unnatural and wrong. Don't pin it on the government or the west or the popularization of the issue. There are so many wrong things in the world so you guys wanna pin all the blame on that and absolve your responsibilities? Damn, still cannot praise you lah pundek. Up you too many times oreddy. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porker Turbocharged July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 Damn, still cannot praise you lah pundek. Up you too many times oreddy. Please be specific on how you up me muayhahaha Damn, still cannot praise you lah pundek. Up you too many times oreddy. Please be specific on how you up me muayhahaha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1fast1 Supersonic July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 (edited) I read a small booklet titled The Land of the Maple Leaves and don't like what I read about Canada, which in 1969 decriminalise gay sex, and step by step LGBT successfully add to the agenda from gay marriage, to effect the law that CRIMINALISE anyone who resist or even don't agree with them. A church cannot reject LGBT if they chose to solemnise and be married there, Parents cannot stop their kids from learning the LGBT agenda, anyone that opposes LGBT are persecuted, jailed and fined. Suddenly LGBT rights is above Law. all this because no one oppose in 1969. I read about how in 1964, the US passed the Civil Rights Act, which outlawed voter discrimination and segregation. Step by step the Blacks successfully pushed their agenda further until the present situation, when they can do everything the White man can. Parents cannot stop their kids from learning that Blacks have equal rights, and anyone that opposes Blacks violently is persecuted, jailed and fined. Suddenly we have a Black President of the United States! All this because no one opposed the Act in 1964. Edited July 2, 2014 by Turboflat4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1fast1 Supersonic July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 (edited) Please be specific on how you up me muayhahahaPlease be specific on how you up me muayhahaha If I get any more specific, RadX will give us both a yellow card... ...before joining in also. Notice you quoted me twice. Is that because I came twice? Edited July 2, 2014 by Turboflat4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigerwoods Turbocharged July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 I read about how in 1964, the US passed the Civil Rights Act, which outlawed voter discrimination and segregation. Step by step the Blacks successfully pushed their agenda further until the present situation, when they can do everything the White man can. Parents cannot stop their kids from learning that Blacks have equal rights, and anyone that opposes Blacks violently are persecuted, jailed and fined. Suddenly we have a Black President of the United States! All this because no one opposed the Act in 1964. wa lan eh damn good... so you think this is for a good cause and a step into the right direction ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged July 2, 2014 Share July 2, 2014 Sgp Govt should learn from the mistakes of Canada and be rigid to say NO means NO to LGBT's agendas, and should not give them further future licenses to hold any celebration in Hong Lim Park. Recently LHL meet Obama, we know Obama is the currently the banner that list for LGBT, u think so easy when there is inter politics involve?? ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
sgCarMart's Community Telegram group is now live!
sgCarMart's Community Telegram group is now live!
How to post a topic in general car discussion!???
How to post a topic in general car discussion!???
Greater Southern Waterfront discussion
Greater Southern Waterfront discussion
Audi A4/A5 Sportback owners thread
Audi A4/A5 Sportback owners thread
Audi going electric in 12 years?
Audi going electric in 12 years?
Alfa 159 Part IX (Any Alfa discussion also welcomed)
Alfa 159 Part IX (Any Alfa discussion also welcomed)
Is it easier to park a car with or without cars around you?
Is it easier to park a car with or without cars around you?
Thoughts on a car-lite Singapore as a car owner?
Thoughts on a car-lite Singapore as a car owner?