The tale of lost virginity and a Montblanc pen

[Tonyhawk]

Corruption is a 2 way street. They seldom charge both at the same time, but will try to secure the conviction of one, before moving on to the other.

 

it seems the well heeled, with better expert advice, have played their cards very well.

 

GG to CPIB.

[JumpySpeedFiend]

Latest ST report very de interesting

 

http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/...00-cheque-gifts

 

The law prof claiming he paid the ger ger back all the money way back in July 2010...

 

Hmmmm.....hope the IA have all his ducks in row properly

 

Also reading today's paper, there was a lot of "negotiation" between Darinne and the IA on how the allegations would be worded - what he wanted her to write she refused. Sounds very do bad to me....

 

He claimed that he paid S$2,500 back to her in cheque but Darinne said she did not receive. So who is lying?

[JumpySpeedFiend]

Corruption is a 2 way street. They seldom charge both at the same time, but will try to secure the conviction of one, before moving on to the other.

 

it seems the well heeled, with better expert advice, have played their cards very well.

 

GG to CPIB.

 

On top of that, usually such transaction would not involve a third party to act as an witness. So one party must be willing to testify against another for them to prosecute.

 

 

 

 

 

[Darryn]

Whoa!!!! My theory was right!! [shocked]

 

1. It is not proven that she go for abortion (the CPIB officier say she say)

2. Even if she did, not proven that it is the lecturer's kid

 

On a slightly different note, taking at face value that she did go for abortion, and that it is his...

 

what does that say about their relationship? Did he know? Did he have a say in the matter? What if, when he found out he was willing to have the kid? It sure raises a whole heck of a lot of unanswered questions to me.

 

And further, while it is possible to get preggers from only twice - particularly when you are her age, it is sure unlucky

 

[Darryn]

He claimed that he paid S$2,500 back to her in cheque but Darinne said she did not receive. So who is lying?

 

Reading last nights reports seems like that part has been refuted.

 

But to me, the very central point still has not been addressed - DID he, in fact change or influence her grade? , if he didn't, in the worst case scenario isn't his only "crime" (which means to say, it is not illegal) that he has taken advantage of a naieve young lady, and he should be censured and disciplined in line with university code?

 

[JumpySpeedFiend]

Reading last nights reports seems like that part has been refuted.

 

But to me, the very central point still has not been addressed - DID he, in fact change or influence her grade? , if he didn't, in the worst case scenario isn't his only "crime" (which means to say, it is not illegal) that he has taken advantage of a naieve young lady, and he should be censured and disciplined in line with university code?

 

Our PCA is a very powerful act. Lots of presumptions clauses here and there.

 

The fact that he is in the position to influence her grades, took gratification from her, is enough to convict him. Whether he indeed improved her grade or not, is immaterial.

 

For NBG vs CS, there is evidence that they are already into an EMA before they have business dealings. Unfortunately, NBG was caught because of another presumption clause, which is the favour can be returned in the future even when the gratification is received now.

[Toapayohkid]

Reading last nights reports seems like that part has been refuted.

 

But to me, the very central point still has not been addressed - DID he, in fact change or influence her grade? , if he didn't, in the worst case scenario isn't his only "crime" (which means to say, it is not illegal) that he has taken advantage of a naieve young lady, and he should be censured and disciplined in line with university code?

 

but is a bribe still a bribe if the receiver take the goods that should not be taken, although did not give favour to the giver.

 

like when we do business in some countries, we think the middleman who we give to got the right networks, undertable got agreement over ktv and gifts for his family from singapore, but in the end the contract we did not get as that middleman changed his mind. still a bribe imho.

[Toapayohkid]

i hope this case get closed soon..there's more eye candy in cecilia,esther and laura.

 

yah, hope got chio girls come out and say they did it too! otherwise, non-issue liao. just a horny cheapskate prof who preys on his students.

[Duk33d]

i think in my opinion, this is like a teacher-student relationship leading to "love", kiss, followed by sex and gifts and dinner. how complicated is this? we need 2 freeking prosectors, defending lawyer, judges, CPIB personnels etc etc to judge a relationship?

 

I think CPIB is wasting public resources in such trivia trials, the law prof should be censured by the teaching institution instead of conducting a time wasting and hours and hours of court time. The govt has runned out of ideas to entertain the public? We are dishing out cases and cases of sex stories to entertain ourselfs..

[Toapayohkid]

i think in my opinion, this is like a teacher-student relationship leading to "love", kiss, followed by sex and gifts and dinner. how complicated is this? we need 2 freeking prosectors, defending lawyer, judges, CPIB personnels etc etc to judge a relationship?

 

I think CPIB is wasting public resources in such trivia trials, the law prof should be censured by the teaching institution instead of conducting a time wasting and hours and hours of court time. The govt has runned out of ideas to entertain the public? We are dishing out cases and cases of sex stories to entertain ourselfs..

 

it was the flavour for 2012 - sex, scandals and corruption, moral and legal. cpib jumping on bandwagon to profile itself more mah, after "success" in peter lim and ng boon gay arrests.

 

still, i want to watch what stupid things the prof would say next - so far he say he not paid salary while suspended but he was paid by nus, he said he was tortured and maybe even water-boarding!

[Jman888]

I quite pity the professor, looks like he has mental problem

[Vid]

I don't understand what the purpose of the appeal is. He already been sentenced, served out time in jail and released. Then appeal for what? If he wins, he doesn't get anything also.

 

http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/former-law-professor-no-show-his-own-appeal-hearing-high-court-proceed

 

 

Former law professor a no-show for his own appeal, but hearing at High Court proceeds

By Bryna Singh

Former law professor Tey Tsun Hang was a no-show for his appeal hearing at the High Court on Wednesday, surprising even his own lawyer, Mr Peter Low.

The 42-year-old, who was sentenced to five months' jail in June for corruptly obtaining sex and gifts from a former student, was due to present his case against both his conviction and sentence earlier in the morning.

"I had no indication that he would not attend," said Mr Low, who was told by his client - five minutes before the hearing was due to begin - that he was in Kuala Lumpur with his parents and will not appear for the hearing scheduled for Oct 16 to 18.

High Court Judge Woo Bih Li also expressed his surprise that Mr Tey did not show up, especially since he had requested for the dates for the appeal. The hearing will however, continue without Mr Tey, who was granted early release from his five-month jail term on Oct 5 for good behaviour.

[Darryn]

I don't understand what the purpose of the appeal is. He already been sentenced, served out time in jail and released. Then appeal for what? If he wins, he doesn't get anything also.

 

http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/former-law-professor-no-show-his-own-appeal-hearing-high-court-proceed

 

 

If appeal succeeds, I would assume that the conviction is removed - as though he were never convicted.

 

Sure, he has served his time - but if he can get the conviction overturned, he gets a lot of things back - not least of which he is no longer a criminal.

[Jman888]

I don't understand what the purpose of the appeal is. He already been sentenced, served out time in jail and released. Then appeal for what? If he wins, he doesn't get anything also.

 

http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/former-law-professor-no-show-his-own-appeal-hearing-high-court-proceed

 

 

 

he wants to show he is better than the judge

 

but with this type of attitude, he probably think he owe the court nothing and has nothing to lose liao

[Knoobie]

if he win in the appeal, can he sue the first judge and all for defamation?

 

wah.. no end to it!

[Vid]

 

If appeal succeeds, I would assume that the conviction is removed - as though he were never convicted.

 

Sure, he has served his time - but if he can get the conviction overturned, he gets a lot of things back - not least of which he is no longer a criminal.

 

Nah... It's just a formality. No way he can win. What can he get back? Certainly not his job. Maybe he can sue the government? [laugh]

 

 

he wants to show he is better than the judge

 

but with this type of attitude, he probably think he owe the court nothing and has nothing to lose liao

 

It's obvious he will lose the appeal. He knows it so no point showing up.