Jump to content

One more juicy news surfaces - Hippo tours tender


Ruriimasu
 Share

Recommended Posts

i saw 1 bapok name in there.no wonder..

from this logic,how come all land parcel has been won by the highest bidder?can anyone explain?and why COE goes to the highest bidder as well?

 

next time all businessman companies inside need to have a ex parrot of pariahment or ministar.if not dont think of doing business in here.

Edited by PorkChong
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone here know the tender requirement or not??

 

also if the bidder who are lowest have compliance with all the other requirement???

 

its easy to say Lowest Bidder get the project.

 

but one can bid low, however during tender justification, realise that what the promise will not come to past. how you expect people to chose the lowest bid?

 

anyway we should wait for more information been dig outrather than jumping to conclusion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep...usu not every time highest bidder or existing vendor will win the case..

 

Maybe mabok coy can lower the ticket prices, introduce more stylo machines, etc....coz the current vehicles i find quite "old"..

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cos i heard some marlboro is linked to the coy who won.

 

Marlboro is the Non-Exec Chairman of that company. After he joined that company following last GE, many staff in that company left too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep...usu not every time highest bidder or existing vendor will win the case..

 

Maybe mabok coy can lower the ticket prices, introduce more stylo machines, etc....coz the current vehicles i find quite "old"..

was i reading wrong. from link. seems to suggest that Mabloro tan is in the company that loss the bidding.

 

which company he is in? the one who won?? or the one with highest bidding?

 

I wonder why the highest bidder who won the bid failed to retain the HiPPO. This highest bidder is said to be led by the former minister Mr Mah Bow Tan who is now the Non-Exec Chairman.

 

 

so he is the chairman of highest bidder?? or the one company who won the bid?

Edited by Joseph22
Link to post
Share on other sites

was i reading wrong. from link. seems to suggest that Mabloro tan is in the company that loss the bidding.

 

which company he is in? the one who won?? or the one with highest bidding?

 

 

so he is the chairman of highest bidder?? or the one company who won the bid?

 

it's a typo error there,if he's the chairman of highest bidder and lost.no one would bother.

but many people will bother if he the chairman of not the highest bidder and yet can won.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's a typo error there,if he's the chairman of highest bidder and lost.no one would bother.

but many people will bother if he the chairman of not the highest bidder and yet can won.

then must type correctly mah.

 

misleading the reader.. poor journalist. [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone here know the tender requirement or not??

 

also if the bidder who are lowest have compliance with all the other requirement???

 

its easy to say Lowest Bidder get the project.

 

but one can bid low, however during tender justification, realise that what the promise will not come to past. how you expect people to chose the lowest bid?

 

anyway we should wait for more information been dig outrather than jumping to conclusion.

 

dont spoil the mood leh, the purpose of the trs posting is to make us jump to conclusions by mentioning former or now pap members as behind the scene on the take :)

 

 

Edited by Toapayohkid
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

i saw 1 bapok name in there.no wonder..

from this logic,how come all land parcel has been won by the highest bidder?can anyone explain?and why COE goes to the highest bidder as well?

 

next time all businessman companies inside need to have a ex parrot of pariahment or ministar.if not dont think of doing business in here.

 

that is why MPs and ministers are so highly sort after

hence their many directorship

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont spoil the mood leh, the purpose of the trs posting is to make us jump to conclusions by mentioning former or now pap members as behind the scene on the take :)

we must have correct facts mah..

 

if not, we are no different from hopping court that is likely to prosecute Gay without any Concret evident [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

we must have correct facts mah..

 

if not, we are no different from hopping court that is likely to prosecute Gay without any Concret evident [laugh]

becareful hor.....3 pps kana contempt of court by just wearing a kangaroo tshirt to court....and u say it out loud! :wacko:

Link to post
Share on other sites

then must type correctly mah.

 

misleading the reader.. poor journalist. [laugh]

 

 

Singapore River Cruises and Global Yellow Pages & Leisure Empire won the tender, but not the highest bid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i saw 1 bapok name in there.no wonder..

from this logic,how come all land parcel has been won by the highest bidder?can anyone explain?and why COE goes to the highest bidder as well?

 

next time all businessman companies inside need to have a ex parrot of pariahment or ministar.if not dont think of doing business in here.

 

Have you wonder why some MIW MPs hold numerous directorships? [sly]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

why tender got 2 prices (a) and (b)?

 

SEN is (a) 101k and (b) 91k

 

GYP is (a) 88k and (b) 88k

 

I suspect two components of the tender (eg River Cruises and Harbour Cruises) or two different components of the income stream (or possibly land rental for the ticketing booths and water rental for the river?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...