Crash test Comparison: German vs. Chinese Cars

[Billcoke]

Edited September 7, 2012 by Billcoke

[Moadia]

Haha..result of a MIC cars r so obvious..no nid to test..

[1fast1]

BS6: truth in advertising.

[Holdenutessv]

Brilliance.

Brilliant in failing indeed.

[ER-3682]

Brilliance.

Brilliant in failing indeed.

These Chinese cars are based on technology of the 90's,how can it compare with the lastest BMW.??Well if you take a 90's BMW 5 series & do a modern 60% offset crash,i think the results will be more less the same.

[Holdenutessv]

These Chinese cars are based on technology of the 90's,how can it compare with the lastest BMW.??Well if you take a 90's BMW 5 series & do a modern 60% offset crash,i think the results will be more less the same.

 

To be honest, I wasn't comparing it to the new BMW. Considering that it's using the tech of the 90's, it's still better than some of 00's US cars though, like the Voyager, Montana, Astro...

[Calford]

May i know what is the reason of digging such an old （2007） news？

Edited September 7, 2012 by Calford

[Hotfavourite]

hmmm...$1 equal $10.... so now this marney include coe and more inflated prices to someone else pocket...so this safety test is like a licence to market the product more classy more money and more safety...rich man no die....or only cheapo man wanna try die......movie. haiz..someone gonna say dunno whad i writing again...

[Tayspiderx]

Must be the abesto in the car that cos the structure to fail,.. Lol

[Fuelsaver]

hmmm...$1 equal $10.... so now this marney include coe and more inflated prices to someone else pocket...so this safety test is like a licence to market the product more classy more money and more safety...rich man no die....or only cheapo man wanna try die......movie. haiz..someone gonna say dunno whad i writing again...

U referrin to me bro? Gd to see u back again. Don't get banned again :)

[Redplanet]

Rich can also be cheapo while poor can be generous. Depends on character.

[Mockngbrd]

These Chinese cars are based on technology of the 90's,how can it compare with the lastest BMW.??Well if you take a 90's BMW 5 series & do a modern 60% offset crash,i think the results will be more less the same.

Not really... bmw passenger shell still better off

 

Edited September 12, 2012 by Mockngbrd

[ER-3682]

Not really... bmw passenger shell still better off

 

This is crashed with 50% offset while the Chinese car is at 60% offset.!

[The_Bear]

These Chinese cars are based on technology of the 90's,how can it compare with the lastest BMW.??Well if you take a 90's BMW 5 series & do a modern 60% offset crash,i think the results will be more less the same.

 

If somebody is selling their products based on 2 decades old technology today, then they have a serious problem.

[Mockngbrd]

This is crashed with 50% offset while the Chinese car is at 60% offset.!

ya, and that BMW was from the 1980s too.

here's the 1990s BMW

 

Edited September 13, 2012 by Mockngbrd

[HP_Lee]

 

Though the Japs are normally termed as Tin-Can cars. I believe, this PRC ones, are worst than Tin-Can.

[Briansoh]

LOL. What did you guys expect from a chinese car. Its so cheap obviously something has to be compromised. You cant have cheap and good. They are mutually exclusive. Anw the E39 looks dam good in the crash test. Wonder if there are any left in Sg? Havent seen one for a really long time already.

[Ungtiong]

really?? compare to the best, 7 series some more!!!!! y not compare to Japanese cars or Korean car....even those compared to BMW 7 series also will turn out as crap...why not take a PRC car, compare its acceleration to a Ferrari and make fun of it...