Jump to content

Homes shouldn't undermine levy


Latka
 Share

Recommended Posts

Straits Times Forum

 

Homes shouldn't undermine levy

 

A HIGHER foreign worker levy was one key factor cited in the rise of charges in some nursing homes ("Some nursing home operators raising fees"; Monday).

 

Yet, the reason that spurred the Ministry of Manpower to hike the levy was to encourage lesser dependence on foreign labour and to encourage employers to redesign jobs that will attract Singaporeans.

 

It defeats the Government's dual aim if nursing homes pass the buck in the levy increase to their clients via stiffer fees.

 

Instead of merely awarding subsidies to families based on income level, the Government could consider providing nursing homes some form of subsidy per resident to help them stay sustainable.

 

These subsidies could come with caveats such as an increased number of Singaporeans taking up patient-care jobs at the

 

homes over a specified period of time.

 

The ministry and the National Trades Union Congress could also help nursing homes redesign patient-care jobs so as to attract more citizens, especially retired nurses, to consider working part time there.

 

The ministry needs to ensure there are more teeth for its policies to work.

 

Using a blunt and simplistic instrument like raising the levy lets employers off the hook by simply passing the buck to consumers.

 

With an ageing population, more could be done to help the nursing-home sector as its role will only increase in importance in the years ahead.

 

Edwin Lim

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Might it be better if gahmen were to subsidize the levy for FW in this industry so as to keep costs low for the operators?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't follow the argument. how does (nursing home) passing the buck forward defeat MOM's twin objectives which the author outlined?

 

he simply put forth the argument with no sound reasoning and premise behind it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I largi don't understand is that if our unemployment rate is about 2%, meaning all people who want job can find job, meaning we are running short of people for business, then why govt still want to control the quota until biz all dying because can't find people willing to work?

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hospital also hire lots of Pinoy FW mah...they not affected?

 

May be Homes forward this rise in levy to consumer, GOv should consider allowing medisave/CPF to cover the bill, i stand corrected.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...