Janling3 6th Gear May 6, 2014 Share May 6, 2014 best part is kongheefattchoy is represented by non other than our very own p8p MP Edwin Tong! conflict of interest or something? :angry: ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackyv Turbocharged May 6, 2014 Share May 6, 2014 conflict of interest or something? :angry: If you, yes, but for them, this is professionalism... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged May 6, 2014 Share May 6, 2014 conflict of interest or something? :angry: Why will there be conflict of interest when he is not in the ministry that use him. If like that he cannot become defense lawyer for other ppl police charge Liao?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamesc Hypersonic May 6, 2014 Share May 6, 2014 I observed during news at Channel 8 last night that there were few (if any) footages of Serina Wee. Think back view only. She has a very nice back side, I always like to see the back of her. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ender Hypersonic May 6, 2014 Share May 6, 2014 (edited) Why will there be conflict of interest when he is not in the ministry that use him. If like that he cannot become defense lawyer for other ppl police charge Liao?? Always in the movie when a charge is read out in court for a felony, it's always the "People vs the "Mr So and So"... As a MP, he serve the people, but as defence laywer he serve the defendant, one cannot serve two master. Edited May 6, 2014 by Ender Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vid Hypersonic May 6, 2014 Share May 6, 2014 She has a very nice back side, I always like to see the back of her. Like to look or like to poke? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp4wn Turbocharged May 6, 2014 Share May 6, 2014 Like to look or like to poke? i think either option also most will take. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baal Supersonic May 6, 2014 Share May 6, 2014 She has a very nice back side, I always like to see the back of her. arh, u mean back view? some can carry it off well. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged May 6, 2014 Share May 6, 2014 Always in the movie when a charge is read out in court for a felony, it's always the "People vs the "Mr So and So"... As a MP, he serve the people, but as defence laywer he serve the defendant, one cannot serve two master. Err.... This is Singapore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vid Hypersonic May 6, 2014 Share May 6, 2014 i think either option also most will take. If can choose, I will take the latter. Can poke means can look. Can look doesn't mean can poke Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baal Supersonic June 4, 2014 Share June 4, 2014 http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/06/04/agc-chc-pastors-tweets-scandalise-the-judiciary/ AGC: CHC Pastor’s tweets scandalise the judiciary June 4th, 2014 | Author: Editorial City Harvest Community Services Association Board and guests - Pastor Tan Kim Hock is 3rd from left (Photo: citynews.sg) TRE reported on 8 May that a reader had informed TRE (‘CHC pastor unhappy with court judgment‘) about 2 controversial tweets from Pastor Tan Kim Hock of City Harvest Church (CHC). Pastor Tan tweeted on May 5 that he was “amazed at the efficiency of ST. They knew it while the court is still going on or do they know earlier”. He then added a link to an ST article on the ongoing trial against CHC founder Pastor Kong Hee and five other church leaders. The ST article was an online news report about Presiding Judge See Kee Oon throwing out a court application to acquit CHC leaders. Judge See said there is enough evidence for the trial to continue with all of the charges intact. The next day (6 May), he twitted again. This time, he quoted a verse from the New Living Translation version of the Bible and broadcast it through Twitter: Ecclesiastes 3:16 – “I also noticed that under the sun there is evil in the courtroom. Yes, even the courts of law are corrupt!” Taking the 2 tweets on 5 and 6 May together, it shows that Pastor Tan is not too happy with the judgment of the court. It is not known what he is trying to imply by quoting the bible verse. It is interesting to note that Pastor Tan quoted the bible verse from the New Living Translation Bible. In the more popular modern translations of the bible e.g. the New International Version (NIV) Bible (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_International_Version), the verse is translated as: Ecclesiastes 3:16 – “And I saw something else under the sun: In the place of judgment — wickedness was there, in the place of justice — wickedness was there.” Yesterday (3 Jun), the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) issued a warning to Pastor Tan for posting the two messages on his Twitter account, that are deemed to have scandalised Singapore’s judiciary system. AGC said one of the tweets had insinuated that the State Courts gave ST ‘preferential and privileged access’ to information on whether CHC leaders involved in an ongoing trial, had a case to answer even before the decision was delivered by Judge See Kee Oon. AGC added that the second tweet which cited the bible verse, insinuated that Singapore’s courts are corrupt, including the court hearing of the CHC leaders. “AGC takes the view that the insinuations set out in the two tweets are insinuations which scandalise the Judiciary of the Republic of Singapore. These insinuations are scurrilous, false, and made without any objective basis,” it said. The AGC has asked the pastor to publish an apology for the publication of the two tweets on his Twitter account within seven days. Pastor Tan has also been warned that publishing such insinuations can amount to contempt of court, and that action may be taken against him. A check shows both tweets have since been removed from his Twitter account. He also made reference to one of the tweets deemed objectionable, tweeting: “On 6 May, I tweeted a bible verse. On hindsight, I realise that the tweet may be possibly misinterpreted and I have since removed it.” Meanwhile, a CHC spokesman told the media, “The church recognises that staff and congregation can post their personal views and opinions on social media but we do encourage them to post responsibly and within the limits of the laws of the country.” Pastor Tan is said to be a founding member of CHC, together with Kong Hee and wife Sun Ho. http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/06/04/agc-chc-pastors-tweets-scandalise-the-judiciary/ 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janling3 6th Gear June 4, 2014 Share June 4, 2014 (edited) Always in the movie when a charge is read out in court for a felony, it's always the "People vs the "Mr So and So"... As a MP, he serve the people, but as defence laywer he serve the defendant, one cannot serve two master. Err.... This is Singapore. Singapore movie... Edited June 4, 2014 by Janling3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duckduck Turbocharged June 4, 2014 Share June 4, 2014 http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/06/04/agc-chc-pastors-tweets-scandalise-the-judiciary/ AGC: CHC Pastor’s tweets scandalise the judiciary June 4th, 2014 | Author: Editorial City Harvest Community Services Association Board and guests - Pastor Tan Kim Hock is 3rd from left (Photo: citynews.sg) TRE reported on 8 May that a reader had informed TRE (‘CHC pastor unhappy with court judgment‘) about 2 controversial tweets from Pastor Tan Kim Hock of City Harvest Church (CHC). Pastor Tan tweeted on May 5 that he was “amazed at the efficiency of ST. They knew it while the court is still going on or do they know earlier”. He then added a link to an ST article on the ongoing trial against CHC founder Pastor Kong Hee and five other church leaders. The ST article was an online news report about Presiding Judge See Kee Oon throwing out a court application to acquit CHC leaders. Judge See said there is enough evidence for the trial to continue with all of the charges intact. The next day (6 May), he twitted again. This time, he quoted a verse from the New Living Translation version of the Bible and broadcast it through Twitter: Ecclesiastes 3:16 – “I also noticed that under the sun there is evil in the courtroom. Yes, even the courts of law are corrupt!” Taking the 2 tweets on 5 and 6 May together, it shows that Pastor Tan is not too happy with the judgment of the court. It is not known what he is trying to imply by quoting the bible verse. It is interesting to note that Pastor Tan quoted the bible verse from the New Living Translation Bible. In the more popular modern translations of the bible e.g. the New International Version (NIV) Bible (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_International_Version), the verse is translated as: Ecclesiastes 3:16 – “And I saw something else under the sun: In the place of judgment — wickedness was there, in the place of justice — wickedness was there.” Yesterday (3 Jun), the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) issued a warning to Pastor Tan for posting the two messages on his Twitter account, that are deemed to have scandalised Singapore’s judiciary system. AGC said one of the tweets had insinuated that the State Courts gave ST ‘preferential and privileged access’ to information on whether CHC leaders involved in an ongoing trial, had a case to answer even before the decision was delivered by Judge See Kee Oon. AGC added that the second tweet which cited the bible verse, insinuated that Singapore’s courts are corrupt, including the court hearing of the CHC leaders. “AGC takes the view that the insinuations set out in the two tweets are insinuations which scandalise the Judiciary of the Republic of Singapore. These insinuations are scurrilous, false, and made without any objective basis,” it said. The AGC has asked the pastor to publish an apology for the publication of the two tweets on his Twitter account within seven days. Pastor Tan has also been warned that publishing such insinuations can amount to contempt of court, and that action may be taken against him. A check shows both tweets have since been removed from his Twitter account. He also made reference to one of the tweets deemed objectionable, tweeting: “On 6 May, I tweeted a bible verse. On hindsight, I realise that the tweet may be possibly misinterpreted and I have since removed it.” Meanwhile, a CHC spokesman told the media, “The church recognises that staff and congregation can post their personal views and opinions on social media but we do encourage them to post responsibly and within the limits of the laws of the country.” Pastor Tan is said to be a founding member of CHC, together with Kong Hee and wife Sun Ho. http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/06/04/agc-chc-pastors-tweets-scandalise-the-judiciary/ frustration mounting liao... is it coz theyre losing sheeps n having hard time paying debts? :X 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ktglfc Hypersonic June 5, 2014 Share June 5, 2014 When can they stop making news, or bad news? Just confine belief to your own church or religion, and stop mixing religion into garmen policies Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged June 5, 2014 Share June 5, 2014 When can they stop making news, or bad news? Just confine belief to your own church or religion, and stop mixing religion into garmen policies Actually... They didn't mix religion into gov policy. It's gov policy that get them into court today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ktglfc Hypersonic June 5, 2014 Share June 5, 2014 Actually... They didn't mix religion into gov policy. It's gov policy that get them into court today. I am referring to this recent article lah :) Why scandalised Singapore’s judiciary system? On the past, I cant comment, cos its up to the judge to decide. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrid 4th Gear June 5, 2014 Share June 5, 2014 Actually... They didn't mix religion into gov policy. It's gov policy that get them into court today. But they mixed money with religion ... the deceitful and gross mis-accounting of money - to fund their own money-making 'aspirations', using donated funds from church tithes collection. They lost all reasonable credibility in doing so, as a religious organization! Still want to quote from the holy book, at this stage of the trial? Tsk tsk ... *shake head* I am referring to this recent article lah :) Why scandalised Singapores judiciary system? On the past, I cant comment, cos its up to the judge to decide. Many SGeans will agree to this. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigerwoods Turbocharged June 5, 2014 Share June 5, 2014 I'm rather surprised the pastor use the bible verse : Ecclesiastes 3:16 to say the Sgp courts are evil. ↡ Advertisement 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Nissan QashQai 2014 Part 2
Nissan QashQai 2014 Part 2
Used Car Dealers Feedback (Part 2)!
Used Car Dealers Feedback (Part 2)!
Which part of SG is flooding now?
Which part of SG is flooding now?
Alfa 159 Part IX (Any Alfa discussion also welcomed)
Alfa 159 Part IX (Any Alfa discussion also welcomed)
Singapore is 'dirty as f***' and smells 'like garbage'
Singapore is 'dirty as f***' and smells 'like garbage'
Corruption Case at CPIB PArt 2
Corruption Case at CPIB PArt 2
Puncture-proof tyres trialled on DHL vans in SG
Puncture-proof tyres trialled on DHL vans in SG
The continuing GLOBAL stressful thread! Part II
The continuing GLOBAL stressful thread! Part II