Jump to content

Cyclist Problem


Lsflsf
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hope to see more mishap of cyclist that uses the roads in future... Makes my day when I hear the news... [:)]

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:21 AM, Dirtbike said:

Racing is illegal....

Cycling is not...

 

Hope i clear your doubt....

 

Cycling on a 80km/hr road affecting the flow of traffic also considered illegal ma...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:25 AM, Dwee said:

Hope to see more mishap of cyclist that uses the roads in future... Makes my day when I hear the news... [:)]

you need to see a shrink..... [shakehead]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:25 AM, Lsflsf said:

Cycling on a 80km/hr road affecting the flow of traffic also considered illegal ma...

 

I am not too sure if its illegal to cycle on a 80km/hr road, but i do know its illegal to cycle on expressway...

Well at the end of the day..we agree to disagree...i am sure i get your point and u do get mine... [;)]

 

Its all about courtesy....and not about self centreness....

 

Cheers!!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:25 AM, Dwee said:

Hope to see more mishap of cyclist that uses the roads in future... Makes my day when I hear the news... [:)]

 

that is exactly the point that i am trying to make in this thread... dont want to see any more unnecessary accidents caused by SOME INCONSIDERATE cyclist. end of the day both parties suffer for something that can entirely be avoided. Dont make life diffcult for anyone la

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:28 AM, Dirtbike said:

I am not too sure if its illegal to cycle on a 80km/hr road, but i do know its illegal to cycle on expressway...

Well at the end of the day..we agree to disagree...i am sure i get your point and u do get mine... [;)]

 

Its all about courtesy....and not about self centreness....

 

Cheers!!!

 

Courtesy have its limit, i get your point and do also get my safety concern, i am not trying to ask cyclist pay road tax lol. end of the day 30km bicycle on a 80km road no one can say it is safe to do so especially with heavy traffic :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:29 AM, Lsflsf said:

that is exactly the point that i am trying to make in this thread... dont want to see any more unnecessary accidents caused by SOME INCONSIDERATE cyclist. end of the day both parties suffer for something that can entirely be avoided. Dont make life diffcult for anyone la

 

Well...i can also phrase it in another way...

accidents caused by SOME INCONSIDERATE drivers...are they making life difficult for us cyclists?

 

get what i mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 7:56 AM, Lsflsf said:

nicholl still not considered xpressway? 80km/hr speed limit lei... bicycle can hit 80 or not? if no then will be retarding the flow of traffice lei. 1.5m clearance? the if he cycle 500m away from the side kerb then i give him 1.5m then 2m away my car 2 wheels on next lane le

 

so lets assume that the driver slow down and drive slowly behind the bicycle and try to get a chance to change lane to siam the rider when the next line is full of cars speeding at 80km/hr, a que definately will form behind his car then ppl will start to recklessly force their way into another lane just to siam this car that is trying to change out of the left lane, isnt this creating more opportunities for a accident to happen??

 

Now what i am trying to say that these cyclist put their lives and others lives in danger when they can simply cycle on a proper track and be safe enough to go back to their loved ones.

 

Cycling on pavement hit children and old grannies at 30km/hr, bro, if you are really going to travel that fast why dont go to a proper cycling track so u wont endanger anyone life at all... thats no excuse at all to not cycle at pavement :)

 

Correct me if I am wrong but, Nicoll Highway speed limit is 70km/hr and not 80. Secondly, in driving school, I believe you are taught to keep 1 - 1.5m away from stationary objects, so if they are on the move, should be the same.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:32 AM, Lsflsf said:

Courtesy have its limit, i get your point and do also get my safety concern, i am not trying to ask cyclist pay road tax lol. end of the day 30km bicycle on a 80km road no one can say it is safe to do so especially with heavy traffic :)

 

on 80km/hr road...commerical vehicles are also only suppose to be doing 50km/hr rite?

So are they suppose to be off the roads too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:33 AM, Dirtbike said:

Well...i can also phrase it in another way...

accidents caused by SOME INCONSIDERATE drivers...are they making life difficult for us cyclists?

 

get what i mean?

 

the drivers cant be regarded as inconsiderate as they are driving on a proper car lane with in proper regulated speed :) Unless the driver is driving at 30km/hr on a 80 road then is inconsiderate right. Dirtbike i understand your point but this is actually to the benefit of both cyclist and driver. Both actually will benefit from safety.

 

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:34 AM, Ghostami said:

Correct me if I am wrong but, Nicoll Highway speed limit is 70km/hr and not 80. Secondly, in driving school, I believe you are taught to keep 1 - 1.5m away from stationary objects, so if they are on the move, should be the same.

 

Erm 70-80 la i forget also le, usually there i do around 74-76 on my digital speedo. much more cars doing excess of 90s there also. School thing u can only remember half, mostly is not practical on normal situation, example, park with kerb or poles. lol carpark only have park with cars, totally not related, 1.5m on normal road is possible but expressway erm quite dangerous wor

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)
  On 7/20/2012 at 8:35 AM, Dirtbike said:

on 80km/hr road...commerical vehicles are also only suppose to be doing 50km/hr rite?

So are they suppose to be off the roads too?

 

70km for commercial vehicle. and always keep left. they usually go way past 70 if most of you notice lol :) so technically speaking they are in the flow of traffic. not really disrupting. :)

Edited by Lsflsf
Link to post
Share on other sites

1.5m from your next car is easy unless you are driving some container on the expressway, expressway lanes are quite spaced out, just that most jokers like to keep either too left or right of their lane. If you wanna ask this question, I believe you should direct to LTA or whatever department involve. Cause in the 1st place the bicycles cannot be cycled on the pavement cause dangerous to the people walking there. So if cycle on the road is dangerous, should the cars be removed?

 

Its more of being considerate and graceful towards each other, slowing down will only cause you like maybe max a min or even 5mins later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:41 AM, Lsflsf said:

the drivers cant be regarded as inconsiderate as they are driving on a proper car lane with in proper regulated speed :) Unless the driver is driving at 30km/hr on a 80 road then is inconsiderate right. Dirtbike i understand your point but this is actually to the benefit of both cyclist and driver. Both actually will benefit from safety.

 

Mm....the cyclist are also riding with LTA rules and regulations in the slowest lane ma...so why are they consider inconsiderate?

The only reason why they become inconsiderate is because drivers arent willing to look out and give way to them, and also respect them that they do also have a right to be on the road....

 

Tailgaters or Road hoggers? Sounds familiar?

 

80km/hr speed limit...does it mean anything slower is consider inconsiderate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 7/20/2012 at 8:47 AM, Dirtbike said:

Mm....the cyclist are also riding with LTA rules and regulations in the slowest lane ma...so why are they consider inconsiderate?

The only reason why they become inconsiderate is because drivers arent willing to look out and give way to them, and also respect them that they do also have a right to be on the road....

 

Tailgaters or Road hoggers? Sounds familiar?

 

80km/hr speed limit...does it mean anything slower is consider inconsiderate?

 

Erm bro i dont think that on a busy high speed road u cycling a bike should have the right of way.

 

Even if ur wife or gf know will also worry for you, u just need 1, just one driver that is not skilled enough, or maybe drunk, or maybe simple blur to kill u instantly. No joke le, 70-80km/hr can kill u instantly even before your life can flash in front of you. All these risk just because you want to enjoy cycling 30km/hr? That driver the most go to jail but u go to heaven, so in the end who suffer? EVERYONE... just because something totally avoidable? why not cycle on roads late night where there is ample lanes for cars to use the 2nd and 1st lance so u can ride ur bicycle on the 3rd lane? or at least to the point that it is safe? Just my friendly advise to those cyclist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be fair....not every cyclist, driver,rider/pedestrian is bad....just that in every group you will bound to find some axxholes around that will screw up everyone's life....will be a never ending argument if we start to take sides..... when a life is at stake, if can just be patient/considerate( be it cyclist/driver/rider/pedestrian) a little and at the end of the day everyone goes home loh..you maybe legally right but when a life is lost, not worth it correct or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally...i dun cycle at that time along those busy roads la....

Weekdays nite i will do Changi Coastal Road...Sat early morning will depends on my kakis (we start as early as 430am)...

 

i didnt say right of way...i m just saying that we should take it in our stride that bicycle is also a vehicle on the road... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most cyclist are driving to cycle by the expensive COE.

You think anyone don't want to own a car and travel in comfort meh?

Those that risk their life on bicycle traveling to work are quite pitiful. Risking their life daily, while bluffing themself they are exercising and helalthy and saving the earth. I don't deny the ambition is correct.

But it's just does not not work in Singapore where the weather is hot and the road are narrow and dangerous.

 

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...