Jump to content

The Perfect Storm of the Stock Market II


 Share

Recommended Posts

ur statement reminds me 1 thing

 

CFD now only can open to people who do CFD before OR study related to Finance who never touch on CFD before..

 

even remisers also dont know the logic sometimes [laugh]

 

Aleast you know one. [cool]

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

ur statement reminds me 1 thing

 

CFD now only can open to people who do CFD before OR study related to Finance who never touch on CFD before..

 

even remisers also dont know the logic sometimes [laugh]

 

So meaning my dad who never trade before cannot open?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supercharged

Usually 2 to 3 days, which counter are you looking at?

 

ramba, midas.. the usual counter that i buy and keep.

 

whats your view?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ramba, midas.. the usual counter that i buy and keep.

 

whats your view?

 

I feel Ramba is overly priced, Midas is fine if you intend to hold for at least a while.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supercharged

I feel Ramba is overly priced, Midas is fine if you intend to hold for at least a while.

 

I feel Ramba got some potential, if you followed them well. at the start of 2013, they actually discover gas in their sites. they have a few other sites nearby and elsewhere.

i actually bought them 2 years back at 0.43 and sold off at 0.63 this year.

 

midas is fine, as long china want to continue building trains and railway :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel Ramba got some potential, if you followed them well. at the start of 2013, they actually discover gas in their sites. they have a few other sites nearby and elsewhere.

i actually bought them 2 years back at 0.43 and sold off at 0.63 this year.

 

midas is fine, as long china want to continue building trains and railway :D

 

Hmm

Link to post
Share on other sites

something i feel strongly about is or are analysts

these analyst reports

 

many are inaccurate

 

many are self serving

 

eg JPM report - you observe them buying into a counter then give out a report to buy

then when price goes up they sell and come out with a report either hold or unweight

 

 

 

the other funny hanky panky activity is funds

if a fund dont do well

they rename it

those who have the old fund will be informed of the transfer without any fee

then when the fund do well

they claim since started do so well and so on

but dont tell the truth that previously they were doing badly

actually many who were forced to switched still are underwater

 

how come MAS doesnt do anything about these

Link to post
Share on other sites

something i feel strongly about is or are analysts

these analyst reports

 

many are inaccurate

 

many are self serving

 

eg JPM report - you observe them buying into a counter then give out a report to buy

then when price goes up they sell and come out with a report either hold or unweight

 

 

 

the other funny hanky panky activity is funds

if a fund dont do well

they rename it

those who have the old fund will be informed of the transfer without any fee

then when the fund do well

they claim since started do so well and so on

but dont tell the truth that previously they were doing badly

actually many who were forced to switched still are underwater

 

how come MAS doesnt do anything about these

 

This is one of reasons, I don't invest in funds. Just see last 50 years in US funds. Hardly any survival. And those that are still around, merely managed through in access of 2 - 3 %, after adjusted inflation. [:/]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...