Ssbcc 1st Gear March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 This is a question to all the photography buffs out there. I'm new to photography, but I would like to upgrade from a point and shoot camera to something better, but I have difficulty deciding between a ILC (the Sony NEX series) or a full sized DSLR (either the Canon EOS series or the Sony Alpha series). Can anyone share about the difference in shooting these 2 groups of cameras? Thanks. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shull Turbocharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 (edited) On 3/7/2012 at 1:04 AM, Ssbcc said: This is a question to all the photography buffs out there. I'm new to photography, but I would like to upgrade from a point and shoot camera to something better, but I have difficulty deciding between a ILC (the Sony NEX series) or a full sized DSLR (either the Canon EOS series or the Sony Alpha series). Can anyone share about the difference in shooting these 2 groups of cameras? Thanks. ILC is just a compact/semi-pro with the ability to change lens.. since this category is relatively new, the lens selection may be limited+expensive.. just go direct to DSLR.. even an entry level series like Canon 1100D is more flexible than the highest end prosumer camera.. Personally, i think viewing thru the viewfinder is the best.. especially in low lighting condition Edited March 7, 2012 by Shull Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davidklt Supercharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 Don't waste time with ilc. Go straight to dslr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chowyunfatt Turbocharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 Both your choices come with interchangeable lenses, both bodies mentioned are also very popular. But you should be clear about your purpose for this camera, so that'll help you to narrow down your choices. try www.clubsnap.com.sg ... might help you to understand your selections better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:04 AM, Ssbcc said: This is a question to all the photography buffs out there. I'm new to photography, but I would like to upgrade from a point and shoot camera to something better, but I have difficulty deciding between a ILC (the Sony NEX series) or a full sized DSLR (either the Canon EOS series or the Sony Alpha series). Can anyone share about the difference in shooting these 2 groups of cameras? Thanks. i upgraded from point and shoot to canon 40d + 17-55mmf2.8 + 2 flash guns + 1 tripod because i need want the speed and quality. it all depends what you wanna shoot. if you just want to take some higher quality photo and speed is not impt, ILC is alright. ILC is light and handy. if you wanna shoot kids, you need speed, go dslr and must buy higher end dslr Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shull Turbocharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:25 AM, Mustank said: i upgraded from point and shoot to canon 40d + 17-55mmf2.8 + 2 flash guns + 1 tripod because i need want the speed and quality. it all depends what you wanna shoot. if you just want to take some higher quality photo and speed is not impt, ILC is alright. ILC is light and handy. if you wanna shoot kids, you need speed, go dslr and must buy higher end dslr no necessarily.. a lens with a low f value will do.. f1.2 or 1.4 will be enough to maintain high shutter speed even at low lighting condition.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:26 AM, Shull said: no necessarily.. a lens with a low f value will do.. f1.2 or 1.4 will be enough to maintain high shutter speed even at low lighting condition.. cannot lah becasue of the following reasons: 1) f1.2-1.4 dont have USM. I am using ai servo to continously re-focusing on the kids because they move damm fast. I need a lens with USM to conplement the ai servo in order to get the correct focus instantly. 2) flash, though troublesome, have some advantage: (1) lights up the hair (2) allows you some leeway in the ISO (3) can give some creative lighting effect 3) f1.2-1.4 depth of view is way too narrow. if out of focus, picture chui..... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windwaver Turbocharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:04 AM, Ssbcc said: This is a question to all the photography buffs out there. I'm new to photography, but I would like to upgrade from a point and shoot camera to something better, but I have difficulty deciding between a ILC (the Sony NEX series) or a full sized DSLR (either the Canon EOS series or the Sony Alpha series). Can anyone share about the difference in shooting these 2 groups of cameras? Thanks. I'm not going to repeat what others have suggested but I'll like you to ask youself one question-; Are you looking for portability? If yes, ILC, if not DSLR. It's not fun carrying a DSLR with 2 lenses and break your back while travelling; that's what I did Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shull Turbocharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:33 AM, Mustank said: cannot lah becasue of the following reasons: 1) f1.2-1.4 dont have USM. I am using ai servo to continously re-focusing on the kids because they move damm fast. I need a lens with USM to conplement the ai servo in order to get the correct focus instantly. 2) flash, though troublesome, have some advantage: (1) lights up the hair (2) allows you some leeway in the ISO (3) can give some creative lighting effect 3) f1.2-1.4 depth of view is way too narrow. if out of focus, picture chui..... IMO, USM is good but not must have.. Canon has the 35mm f1.4 L... price is steepy since it's an L.. but it fits your requirement.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acanthus Neutral Newbie March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 IMO, forget about Sony, the body might be cheaper than Canon and Nikon but check out the price for their lenses..its If you are looking for a decent DSLR, i will recommend the Pentax K7, good thing about Pentax is that the SLR lenses are compatible with the Digital series, which makes your range of lenses pretty huge. A 50mm f1.4 manual lens can be bought via ebay for as little as $50, and its a great fun lens to play with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chowyunfatt Turbocharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 1DX PERIOD! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:44 AM, Chowyunfatt said: 1DX PERIOD! 10K Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shull Turbocharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:44 AM, Chowyunfatt said: 1DX PERIOD! so long nv see you online.. come here first time recommend the top end Canon.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shull Turbocharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:48 AM, Mustank said: 10K i'm looking at 2nd hand 5DII or the new 5DIII.. upgrade from my old 20D... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:39 AM, Shull said: IMO, USM is good but not must have.. Canon has the 35mm f1.4 L... price is steepy since it's an L.. but it fits your requirement.. donno want lah......hope to upgrade to 5dmk3 + 70-200 f2.8 IS USM mk2.....but i need the marnie to quickly pay off housing loan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ssbcc 1st Gear March 7, 2012 Author Share March 7, 2012 Thanks for all the pointers. For me, portability is important as I tend to shoot mostly when I go travelling. That was why i was attracted to ILC initially. But now I notice that some DSLRs are relatively small as well and I do see a lot of people travelling with SLRs. One question for those who have SLRs, which lenses do you bring with you when you travel? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chowyunfatt Turbocharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:48 AM, Mustank said: 10K Its US$6,800 speculated...so if you compare it to the previous 1DS Mk3...its actually cheaper & better leh... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chowyunfatt Turbocharged March 7, 2012 Share March 7, 2012 On 3/7/2012 at 1:48 AM, Shull said: so long nv see you online.. come here first time recommend the top end Canon.. Hello, my young friend Its not the top till its launched ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
No more Nikons... The End Of A Beautiful Era... don't make it too snappy
No more Nikons... The End Of A Beautiful Era... don't make it too snappy
Need help with DSLR
Need help with DSLR
DSLR Nikon D5000 or Canon E550
DSLR Nikon D5000 or Canon E550
If money is no issue, then DSLR is for you.
If money is no issue, then DSLR is for you.
Movie shot on a Canon DSLR
Movie shot on a Canon DSLR
Canon dslr camera
Canon dslr camera