Jump to content

ALL consolidated SMRT/NEL/KT.. simisai BREAKDOWNS here!


New_Atlantis
 Share

Recommended Posts

So many MRT problems.

They all have to be scrapped also !

Shutdown everything, dismantle SMRT.

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the current one they built cant even maintain properly, what makes them think building a new one will be better? 

​Ya lor, Actually I feel overhull would be a better choice, Stripped the running cable, stripped the track, decommission LRT train and still remain the bare skalaton of the concrete track and train station.

 

​Then re add in new design, new trains with improved features and hopefully more power savings and add in power cables that able to run higher load etc..

 

​This will be better then scrap the LRT train..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought LRT is problematic right from the start? Anyway who takes LRT? Ppl staying in the area either take bus or drive car. It's good news that they want to scrap it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bt Panjang LRT will end up in Bandung.  [:p]

 

 

 

SMRT Corp has clarified that it has not received any official notification as to whether it has won a tender to build a public rail project in Bandung, Indonesia.

The rail operator's statement to the Singapore Exchange on Monday night followed a Facebook post by Bandung mayor Ridwan Kamil last week.

Mr Kamil had written that SMRT had won the bid for the LRT Corridor 1.

http://www.straitstimes.com/business/smrt-clarifies-bandung-project-bid

  • Praise 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bt Panjang LRT will end up in Bandung. [:p]

 

 

SMRT Corp has clarified that it has not received any official notification as to whether it has won a tender to build a public rail project in Bandung, Indonesia.

The rail operator's statement to the Singapore Exchange on Monday night followed a Facebook post by Bandung mayor Ridwan Kamil last week.

Mr Kamil had written that SMRT had won the bid for the LRT Corridor 1.

http://www.straitstimes.com/business/smrt-clarifies-bandung-project-bid

If this is true, their procurement process must be damn lousy. SMRT is the system operator and they had 0 experience building systems or planning for it. Heck, they can't even do proper maintenance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cannot solve the problem ... Scrapped it ... Would seem like an easy way not considering tax payer $ invested on the system..

Should scrap the pax instead for suggesting tat.. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

So many MRT problems.

They all have to be scrapped also !

Shutdown everything, dismantle SMRT.

Agree

 

Build condo

Cannot solve the problem ... Scrapped it ... Would seem like an easy way not considering tax payer $ invested on the system..

Should scrap the pax instead for suggesting tat.. :(

Same lo

 

Cannot maintain security, ban internet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cannot solve the problem ... Scrapped it ... Would seem like an easy way not considering tax payer $ invested on the system..

Should scrap the pax instead for suggesting tat.. :(

 

There will be endless critics in whatever they do. If they don't scrapped it ppl will ask why smrt is continually pouring in more money into a failed system? Turn left cannot, turn right also cannot. So how? Jump? [laugh]

Edited by Watwheels
Link to post
Share on other sites

​Ya lor, Actually I feel overhull would be a better choice, Stripped the running cable, stripped the track, decommission LRT train and still remain the bare skalaton of the concrete track and train station.

 

​Then re add in new design, new trains with improved features and hopefully more power savings and add in power cables that able to run higher load etc..

 

​This will be better then scrap the LRT train..

 

Used polling and transfer decision to the people. 

 

If cost goes up becomes an inform choice.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypersonic

Got killer motorbikes on the foot path leh.

 

Then ride killer motorbikes on the foot path with them to MRT also lo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back when the LRT was built, you mean the double decker bus wasn't invented in the world yet meh? Why does this statement makes it sounds like double decker bus is a newer invention than the LRT ah?

 

Based on this logic, why did they build all the other LRT systems in the first place? Since double decker bus has always been able to carry more passengers.

 

"....a fully loaded high-capacity bus like a double-decker can take 130 passengers, which is more than the 105-person capacity of a single Bombardier train," he said.

Edited by Jellandross
  • Praise 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lesson learn, is not to build a new LRT, but re-enforce the concrete track and run double-decker bus on it. Eliminate congestion, track signalling problem, track fault, kill 3 birds with one stone. Double-decker captain will be less stressful as no need to worry about traffic jam and will always arrive on time. hahaha.

 

Back when the LRT was built, you mean the double decker bus wasn't invented in the world yet meh? Why does this statement makes it sounds like double decker bus is a newer invention than the LRT ah?

Based on this logic, why did they build all the other LRT systems in the first place? Since double decker bus has always been able to carry more passengers.

"....a fully loaded high-capacity bus like a double-decker can take 130 passengers, which is more than the 105-person capacity of a single Bombardier train," he said.

 

  • Praise 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cannot solve the problem ... Scrapped it ... Would seem like an easy way not considering tax payer $ invested on the system..

Should scrap the pax instead for suggesting tat.. :(

They never design a good and reliable train system in the first place and now waste tax payer money by saying scrap it. And no one dare to question them even another big mistake has made!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back when the LRT was built, you mean the double decker bus wasn't invented in the world yet meh? Why does this statement makes it sounds like double decker bus is a newer invention than the LRT ah?

 

Based on this logic, why did they build all the other LRT systems in the first place? Since double decker bus has always been able to carry more passengers.

 

"....a fully loaded high-capacity bus like a double-decker can take 130 passengers, which is more than the 105-person capacity of a single Bombardier train," he said.

 

hahha good also they say , bad also they say ....  

  • Praise 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

So many MRT problems.

They all have to be scrapped also !

Shutdown everything, dismantle SMRT.

 

wan to dismantle also dismantle their high pay useless head first  :D

↡ Advertisement
  • Praise 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...