Watwheels Supersonic March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 (edited) so this action is inherently risky and thank God nothing has happened so far. maintainence crew have been in and out of it for so many years w/o mishap --> you try telling these to the deceaseds' parents this is a forum for people to discuss. period. This clearly reflects what kinda person you are. Period. I wouldn't suggest someone to tell the aggrieved parent anything. I would rather give them peace and leave them alone. What I was trying to say is not to cause unneccessary alarm as it is not helping anyone. Your comments speak for itself. Edited March 24, 2016 by Watwheels ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 That would be the wrong priority for customer complains to supersede safety. Afterall, just implement a safer protocol doesn't cost much time. It may be a frustration, but it save your life. I'm sure there are more "loopholes" to be found. It's whether they want to do it or not. Or wait till the next deaths or serious injuries to occur. Yes wrong priorirty because SMRT had been politize. The moment a small delay only you see people like GMS and GG come out and shoot. They will come clean one.. don't worry... and the management will always say the bottom didn't follow SOP ... Management always no fault one, cos they won't have any chance to follow the SOP as they always sit inside office ... Each level have their own set of SOP. Most of the time ground level staff don't understand why the SOP is build in a certain way hence always bleached it happen in every company. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kusje Supersonic March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 How did the accident happen? SMRT's findings showed that the team was moving in a single file on the walkway beside the track, towards the servicing point. A supervisor was at the head of the line and the two deceased were directly behind him. The rest of the team was following behind. The team was walking in the opposite direction of the oncoming train that was heading towards Pasir Ris station. It is not known how the two men got on the track or got close enough to the train. - See more at: http://news.asiaone.com/news/singapore/it-not-known-how-men-got-track#sthash.QH8Qe6By.dpuf Is this logical at all? The other 13 people around were looking at the scenery instead? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jman888 Moderator March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 Is this logical at all? The other 13 people around were looking at the scenery instead? i believe that statement was made before the full investigation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 (edited) So it's a problem with supervision and execution ?Depend actually. Most of the time is individual. But the implication is larger if it's a supervisory or management person who bleach. Like for this instance, be it the Supervisor or the station controller that bleach, the impact is the people below who suffer. Is this logical at all? The other 13 people around were looking at the scenery instead? Maybe too fast to issue press release and investigation wasn't complete. Edited March 24, 2016 by Joseph22 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nzy Twincharged March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 Most of the time ground level staff don't understand why the SOP is build in a certain way hence always bleached it happen in every company. Yep. This one happens every where. Even in NS also. Alot of people don't understand the reason for the SOP and feel it is a waste of time. Many like to take shortcuts and if nothing happens, they think that they have just saved some time/effort. They only realise why the SOP is so important when something happens. Then if supervisor very strict on the SOP, some people not happy, think that the supervisor is picking on them. Supervisor close one eye, something happen, then supervisor's fault. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 Yep. This one happens every where. Even in NS also. Alot of people don't understand the reason for the SOP and feel it is a waste of time. Many like to take shortcuts and if nothing happens, they think that they have just saved some time/effort. They only realise why the SOP is so important when something happens. Then if supervisor very strict on the SOP, some people not happy, think that the supervisor is picking on them. Supervisor close one eye, something happen, then supervisor's fault.That's why when sometime a peers got promoted. Sometime we say he change ever since he become management. But the truth is, he didn't change. It's just that suddenly he was given a bigger view due to his higher post result in him having greater understanding on why certain things are done in a certain way. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lala81 Hypersonic March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 That's why when sometime a peers got promoted. Sometime we say he change ever since he become management. But the truth is, he didn't change. It's just that suddenly he was given a bigger view due to his higher post result in him having greater understanding on why certain things are done in a certain way. That's true. So the supervisory or management person has no responsibility for lack of execution or supervision, unless they themselves bleach ? If the supervisor or management person never constantly remind or rectify breaches happening under him, he's also culpable. But of course it's harder to prove this as it's consider part of his routine. That's why in SAF, there's the designated safety officer who's only task is to maintain safety. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dleodleo Twincharged March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 I dunno why the trains are also not signalled when there are already people walking on the maintenance pathway. Seems like logical step would have been to alert the trains once anyone is on the tracks/path Pasir ris is an end station, so the train can enter in at either A/B side. Maybe that played a role? The team thought the train was going one way, but actually it came towards them? Ya... Maybe. Cos witness mentioned that she heard shouts and waving at the train as if asking it to stop like that. And another witness mentioned that he heard someone shouted Oi Oi Oi But the truth will be out, they cannot hide cos one of the deceased's father and brother are working at the SMRT too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 (edited) So the supervisory or management person has no responsibility for lack of execution or supervision, unless they themselves bleach ?It really depend. Like what Lala mention, if he know of breach and yet didn't bother to rectify. There are cases which bleach happen but no one know about the breach. We all are working adult, we are well aware that we can breach some policy without anyone notice. Edited March 24, 2016 by Joseph22 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vratenza Supersonic March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 It really depend. Like what Lala mention, if he know of bleach and yet didn't bother to rectify. There are cases which bleach happen but no one know about the bleach. We all are working adult, we are well aware that we can bleach some policy without anyone notice. SAF motto? Can do anything, just don't get caught? side note: no bleach, dishwashing detergent also can 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 SAF motto? Can do anything, just don't get caught? side note: no bleach, dishwashing detergent also can Yeah. You got it. Alamak didn't change fast enough kenna found out. Lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duckduck Turbocharged March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 track inspection, saw style Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldbug 6th Gear March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 despite Saw the civilian's gross incompetence, no staff ever died under her watch, after general Desmond brought his SAF culture into MRT, 2 men died under his watch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
13177 Hypersonic March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 despite Saw the civilian's gross incompetence, no staff ever died under her watch, after general Desmond brought his SAF culture into MRT, 2 men died under his watch It is the first time SMRT has such a serious incidence? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadX Moderator March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 It is the first time SMRT has such a serious incidence? yes! no deaths SInce operation in 1987 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldbug 6th Gear March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 yes! no deaths SInce operation in 1987 see, run by civilian boh taiji Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jman888 Moderator March 24, 2016 Share March 24, 2016 yes! no deaths SInce operation in 1987 *remark: no death of smrt personnel but many jumper ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Related Discussions
Related Discussions
Consolidated Info on MRT/LRT Maintenance & Breakdown Part II
Consolidated Info on MRT/LRT Maintenance & Breakdown Part II
Public transport fare hike: Adults to pay 10 to 11 cents more per journey from Dec 23
Public transport fare hike: Adults to pay 10 to 11 cents more per journey from Dec 23
Penang fight scene garners 8mil views
Penang fight scene garners 8mil views
Johor Bahru-Singapore RTS link
Johor Bahru-Singapore RTS link
Electric van leasing firm EVCo declared insolvent with debts of close to $50m
Electric van leasing firm EVCo declared insolvent with debts of close to $50m
Japanese city Nagoya bans walking on escalators
Japanese city Nagoya bans walking on escalators
SBS Transit retains Bukit Merah bus package, loses Jurong West package to SMRT
SBS Transit retains Bukit Merah bus package, loses Jurong West package to SMRT