Jump to content

COE for Parking Lot soon?


Gukubird
 Share

Recommended Posts

Car park crunch: More radical solutions needed, say experts

 

 

SINGAPORE - Even as the authorities look into the idea of mechanised car parks, some analysts pointed out the challenges - such as maintenance and costs - with such a system. Instead, they suggested more innovative ideas, including creating a private market for parking spaces and allocating different zones for vehicles of different sizes.

 

National University of Singapore transport expert Lee Der Horng noted that it is "very common" in some cities in the United States to group cars of similar sizes together.

 

Said Associate Professor Lee: "So the smaller cars are parked in the same zone, and it's the same for the sports utility vehicles (SUVs), for instance."

 

Nanyang Technological University transport economist Michael Li has a more radical suggestion: Allocate each household with a car park lot and allow those who do not own any vehicles to "rent" out their lots to others, thus creating a market which would enable demand and supply to balance out.

 

According to the Ministry of National Development, six in 10 Housing and Development Board (HDB) households do not own cars. About a third own one car, while 5 per cent own two or more.

 

The transport analysts pointed out that the cheap HDB parking fees here would escalate the carpark crunch in the years to come.

 

In Taipei, for instance, motorists have to pay a flat fee of as much as S$200,000 for one parking lot, said Assoc Prof Lee.

 

He added that policymakers should think about a "market-based" solution - in which parking fees will have to be higher - for housing estates that face severe car park shortage.

 

Last Friday, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan wrote on his blog that, while new estates will come with adequate car parks, new solutions are needed in the older HDB estates "where there is little space to add new lots".

 

Mr Khaw has asked the HDB to look into mechanised parking systems but he noted there are "implementation issues" to be worked through.

 

HDB residents who spoke to Today generally welcomed the idea - as long as the system is thoroughly tested and properly maintained.

 

Some suggested a policy which require residents to secure a parking lot before they buy a vehicle - a suggestion mooted last year in this newspaper in a column by consultant Richard Hartung.

Calling for a balloting system for HDB households who wish to own more than one car, IT consultant Brandon Tan, 40, said: "HDB carparks are supposed to be for the middle-class masses ... If people want a second or third car but fail to win the ballot, then they should look for alternative parking solutions." Tan Weizhen

Edited by Gukubird
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

The transport analysts pointed out that the cheap HDB parking fees here would escalate the carpark crunch in the years to come.

 

To avoid the crunch, fees to increase? Oh priest lah, don't grope around the bush. Income Opportunity say so lah.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The transport analysts pointed out that the cheap HDB parking fees here would escalate the carpark crunch in the years to come.

 

To avoid the crunch, fees to increase? Oh priest lah, don't grope around the bush. Income Opportunity say so lah.

taxis how? [laugh] [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

isn't not long ago there was a survey ... office carpark sibei enough ???

hmm ... i guess all buy cars and park at hdb and did not drive to office?

1+1 <> 2 [laugh]

Edited by Wt_know
Link to post
Share on other sites

isn't not long ago there was a survey ... office carpark sibei enough ???

hmm ... i guess all buy cars and park at hdb and did not drive to office?

1+1 <> 2 [laugh]

 

They have foresight and proactive. They are preparing before the crunch comes. That will be their excuse.

 

But, first solve the flooding and public transport woes!

Edited by Kangadrool
Link to post
Share on other sites

They have foresight and proactive. They are preparing before the crunch comes. That will be their excuse.

 

But, first solve the flooding and public transport woes!

 

They got "pay cut" coming, you think they in a mood to work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think this applies only to locations which there is a persistent shortage of lots and they simply dont have land to build any more mcsp. so residents are willing to settle for mech parking than no parking :huh:

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...