Jump to content

Enough MRT threads, let's go back to.....


KARTer
 Share

Recommended Posts

Now trains are not certain/safe, taxi fares have gone up, COE is expensive, what's left for the pple?

 

Walk, or cycle?

 

If cars population reduces due to high COE, maybe its time to convert one lane for bicycles?

 

Alternatively: Total ban of private cars in CBD (larger radius than current 'CBD', may be extend the CBD radius to places like Newton Station ie one more station away from current CBD boundary?).

 

Build more fringe carparks (for those insist of driving from home, they park at fringe carparks, then use rental bicycle to reach office), and more private buses (for those who stay far from fringe carpark but dont drive).

 

At these fringe carpark, LTA provides cheap rental bicycle (can be electric bikes also) for commuters to exercise the legs and cycle to their work place.

 

 

For those who die die must drive into CBD, or take cab into CBD: high ERP which LTA can only use to buy more bicycles for rental. In fact revenues from COE/ERP must be substantially channelled to buy these bicycles, or even build sheltered bicycle lanes and parking stations.

 

Of course our $$$ minded govt/LTA must have a different sets of 'Leaders' to seriously consider this system which benefits the pple instead of the elites. We all know how to change the leaders..... but will we, comes next GE?

 

Its up to us.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

As much as people like to voice their frustrations.....why not we just consolidate all MRT issue related stuff to 1 or 2 threads? suddenly the MCF got like 30% thread on SMRT issue started by domaint MCF members.

 

It's december man! holiday time man.....read too much of these kind of thread very depressing...

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about only Eiltes and FT can drive?

 

Singaporean and SPR can only take public transport?

 

In exchange, all Singaporean and SPR will have free education and medical?

 

And death penalty for death caused by drunk drinking or reckless driving?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 12/19/2011 at 2:29 AM, Gukubird said:

How about only Eiltes and FT can drive?

 

Singaporean and SPR can only take public transport?

 

In exchange, all Singaporean and SPR will have free education and medical?

 

And death penalty for death caused by drunk drinking or reckless driving?

 

SPR and FT? what are the difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 12/19/2011 at 1:34 AM, KARTer said:

Now trains are not certain/safe, taxi fares have gone up, COE is expensive, what's left for the pple?

 

Walk, or cycle?

 

If cars population reduces due to high COE, maybe its time to convert one lane for bicycles?

 

Alternatively: Total ban of private cars in CBD (larger radius than current 'CBD', may be extend the CBD radius to places like Newton Station ie one more station away from current CBD boundary?).

 

Build more fringe carparks (for those insist of driving from home, they park at fringe carparks, then use rental bicycle to reach office), and more private buses (for those who stay far from fringe carpark but dont drive).

 

At these fringe carpark, LTA provides cheap rental bicycle (can be electric bikes also) for commuters to exercise the legs and cycle to their work place.

 

 

For those who die die must drive into CBD, or take cab into CBD: high ERP which LTA can only use to buy more bicycles for rental. In fact revenues from COE/ERP must be substantially channelled to buy these bicycles, or even build sheltered bicycle lanes and parking stations.

 

Of course our $$$ minded govt/LTA must have a different sets of 'Leaders' to seriously consider this system which benefits the pple instead of the elites. We all know how to change the leaders..... but will we, comes next GE?

 

Its up to us.

CEO malingering to make herself appear indisdensable?

Current bus/bicycle lane adequate. Bicycle lanes will bring suicide cyclists in stampede, causing more accidents (I am also law-abiding cyclist)

LTA already dismissed all subsequent suggestions as lack of space...

Recently I seen more mis-leaders than leaders. So sorry about that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 12/19/2011 at 2:14 AM, Pocus said:

As much as people like to voice their frustrations.....why not we just consolidate all MRT issue related stuff to 1 or 2 threads? suddenly the MCF got like 30% thread on SMRT issue started by domaint MCF members.

 

It's december man! holiday time man.....read too much of these kind of thread very depressing...

I believe more people excited by holiday mood more agonised with such threat to our year-end holiday (so far it seems SMRT capable of only temporary repairs: can break down again anytime/anywhere). [sweatdrop]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 12/19/2011 at 2:29 AM, Gukubird said:

How about only Eiltes and FT can drive?

 

Singaporean and SPR can only take public transport?

 

In exchange, all Singaporean and SPR will have free education and medical?

 

And death penalty for death caused by drunk drinking or reckless driving?

It does make sense if that is the Elites' protocol (Singaporeans becomes 2nd class citizens in 3rd world country at home).

Nothing is free.

Drunk driving or reckless driving with tree trunk is alright?

Link to post
Share on other sites

SG will not promote bicycle becos

 

 

1) no revenue from road tax collection from cyclist

2) no revenue from COE when purchase of bicycle

3) no revenue from tax on fuel for bicycle

 

IMO

Edited by Sk65
Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 12/19/2011 at 3:29 AM, Pocus said:

SPR and FT? what are the difference?

 

The caste system in Singapore

 

Elites -> FT -> SPR -> Singaporean (regardless of origin)

Edited by Gukubird
Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 12/19/2011 at 3:57 AM, Good-Carbuyer said:

It does make sense if that is the Elites' protocol (Singaporeans becomes 2nd class citizens in 3rd world country at home).

Nothing is free.

Drunk driving or reckless driving with tree trunk is alright?

 

Drunk or reckless driving and hugged a tree trunk? Paying the fine to NEA is quite hefty enuff

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 12/19/2011 at 3:49 AM, Good-Carbuyer said:

CEO malingering to make herself appear indisdensable?

Current bus/bicycle lane adequate. Bicycle lanes will bring suicide cyclists in stampede, causing more accidents (I am also law-abiding cyclist)

LTA already dismissed all subsequent suggestions as lack of space...

Recently I seen more mis-leaders than leaders. So sorry about that.

OIC..... mis-leaders leading us to more GOod Years?!! ............... :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 12/19/2011 at 4:04 AM, Sk65 said:

SG will not promote bicycle becos

 

 

1) no revenue from road tax collection from cyclist

2) no revenue from COE when purchase of bicycle

3) no revenue from tax on fuel for bicycle

 

IMO

Isn't our govt enouraging us to go green and stay healthy?

 

Both can be achieved by bicycles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 12/19/2011 at 1:10 PM, Good-Carbuyer said:

I bellieve you may be aware of their lip service [laugh]

i believe we can choose from one of the hot lips here:-

 

post-79015-1324303324_thumb.jpgpost-79015-1324303372_thumb.jpgpost-79015-1324303401_thumb.jpg

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...