Woolff Neutral Newbie December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 Instead of fining SMRT, LTA should demand SMRT to give free ride to all for a few month and sack the CEO and grounded her and no more hair dire for her! No, pay those trap in the train $500 per half hour for first hour and$1000 per half hour thereafter. Those who walk down,enter and cannot get on train, pay them $50 for staff incompetance without warning commuters. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertlsc Neutral Newbie December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 we are just simply naive! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mdfaz 2nd Gear December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 Tuck Yew has the hottest minister seat. Even spicier than khaw. This will definitely be brought up the next election.. Unless smrt can make good over the next 4-5 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard_Peh 1st Gear December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 Tuck Yew has the hottest minister seat. Even spicier than khaw. This will definitely be brought up the next election.. Unless smrt can make good over the next 4-5 years. Q:SMRT? A:Very hard Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustank Hypersonic December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 A friend from SMRT told me every train is suppose to have spare batteries that can last an hour in case of power failure if your friend knows the root cause for all these breakdowns, it is time to blow the whistle! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scion Turbocharged December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 Raymond Lim must be thinking to himself "walau, heng ah... bo wa eh dai ji" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroAlan Neutral Newbie December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 UPS just like our car battery after 2 yrs need to change, if they din test it the result will be when needed it just doesn't power up. Base on real case 1 hour to recover is not possible. MRT breakdown: Don't break the windows, says SMRT Published on Dec 17, 2011 Purchase this article for republication Buy SPH photos If you are stuck inside a train, never smash the windows or force the doors open. -- PHOTO: TWITTERIf you are stuck inside a train, never smash the windows or force the doors open. Stay calm and wait for help. This was the advice from SMRT, a day after a massive service disruption led to about 4,000 commuters being stuck in trains that had stalled. One frustrated commuter used a fire extinguisher to smash the glass on the door. He should not have done so but considering the situation, he will not be penalised, SMRT officials said. Senior vice-president for communications and services, Mr Goh Chee Kong, said that in the event of a power failure, there is a back-up system that will activate emergency lights within the carriages and provide ventilation. If commuters have to disembark from the trains onto the tracks, the power supply will be cut off and staff deployed to guide them, he said. Mr Goh said that SMRT works closely with schools and grassroots organisations to educate commuters on proper procedures to follow during an emergency. Launched in 2006, the SMRT Community Emergency Preparedness programme reaches out to about 3,000 members of the public each year. SMRT will continue to work closely with the community on the project, Mr Goh said Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroAlan Neutral Newbie December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 (edited) SINGAPORE NEWS SMRT CEO not stepping down Posted: 18 December 2011 2119 hrs SINGAPORE: SMRT CEO Saw Phaik Hwa has told Channel NewsAsia that she has no plans to step down over the disruptions. She said she's truly sorry for the inconvenience and discomfort faced by commuters, and that as CEO she's naturally responsible. But she said being responsible does not mean walking away, instead it means doing all she can to get the problem fixed. She said she is staying put to make everything right. Ms Saw also admitted there were several problems that surfaced during the disruptions. These included detraining procedures, announcements to the public, and bus shuttling arrangements. She acknowledged that SMRT could have done better. - CNA/ck Edited December 18, 2011 by BroAlan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ender Hypersonic December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 (edited) SINGAPORE NEWS SMRT CEO not stepping down Posted: 18 December 2011 2119 hrs SINGAPORE: SMRT CEO Saw Phaik Hwa has told Channel NewsAsia that she has no plans to step down over the disruptions. She said she's truly sorry for the inconvenience and discomfort faced by commuters, and that as CEO she's naturally responsible. But she said being responsible does not mean walking away, instead it means doing all she can to get the problem fixed. She said she is staying put to make everything right. Ms Saw also admitted there were several problems that surfaced during the disruptions. These included detraining procedures, announcements to the public, and bus shuttling arrangements. She acknowledged that SMRT could have done better. - CNA/ck She forgot about the being accountable. We want her to step down because we have no confidence in her..In fact we aren't quite sure if she capable of fixing the problem since SMRT don't learn from mistake. Too bad we are not shareholders.. Edited December 18, 2011 by Ender Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF 4th Gear December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 She forgot about the being accountable. We want her to step down because we have no confidence in her..In fact we aren't quite sure if she capable of fixing the problem since SMRT don't learn from mistake. Don't think she'll heed the call to resign from us, the commoners.....she'll only do so if the SMRT board has no confidence in her and ask her to leave.....else, tang gu gu lah!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poper 2nd Gear December 18, 2011 Share December 18, 2011 Since almost all is own by government one or another way Let's say PAP will be voted out in the next election WP the new ruling party So all this business will goes to WP or still PAP own? Bro, you question reflects how common singaporeans have been brain-washed. 1. Govt don't "own" any money, they simply safeguard it and put it to use 2. PAP =/= Govt, Govt is who we voted in; may it be WP, NSP, LPPL. In elections, PAP often used lift upgrading as a carrot to win votes.. Obviously, these programmes uses national (our) money.. Therefore, they use our money to buy vote for themselves and call it a "reward" to voters. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
MPV reverse into taxi, blame taxi, Kena csi
MPV reverse into taxi, blame taxi, Kena csi
Sometimes, i dun blame drivers for accidents!
Sometimes, i dun blame drivers for accidents!
So.... Free Porn & Illicit Liquor To Be Blame
So.... Free Porn & Illicit Liquor To Be Blame
Train Fault, Don't Blame SMRT....
Train Fault, Don't Blame SMRT....
Who to blame - really
Who to blame - really
Blame the goverment ?
Blame the goverment ?
Guys - Do U Agree? - Blame the material girl?
Guys - Do U Agree? - Blame the material girl?