Jump to content

Blame the goverment ?


Seaweed
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ccb. In the end, they do 1 show , heavy fine smrt, knn $ left pocket put into right pocket.

Puay cb.

He deserve the white color kid.

The fine should be seriously high AND benift the passengers directly: instead of a fine of $XXXXXX, it should be free train rides for everyone (maybe exclude FTs/FWs, if you like) for 1 day for every 15mins of delays. This is not all, deduct salaries of the senior management for every occurance of breakdowns. The higher the ranks, the higher the deductions.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

since public transport privatized......can we call it private transport instead...???

for public use its public transport

for $$ wise, its private own

depends on the usage

Link to post
Share on other sites

like this...end of the yr...profit low...she don't sack herself...she also karna sack by others...at least if make money...everyone will still keep quiet....unless she sack herself... [laugh][laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

then their next reason for failure is..."we can't solve the problem during the few hours that the train is not running"..."We are still trying our best"..."The problem is complex"...

 

Why shut it down for 48hrs...we need time to get to the root of the problem...it is bitter medicine...but definitely better then breakdown once in a few days....all from transport ministry...lta...smrt etc etc...should spend that 48hrs all on the track finding the problem...and not talking to TV etc...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wonder if SMRT do have a set of SOP for this kind of situation...if they have...why didn't they show it or utilise it? unless keeping passenger onboard for a prolong period of time is part of the SOP...or if it is not...then why didn't they activate the crisis plan?

 

the guy on tv say the train still got airflow but just not strong enough so passenger don't feel it...i think he is damm stupid...if no one feels it...even if there really is...it is deem "useless"...i think shoudl also put them in that kind of situation for them to realise the real thing...obviously their imaginary situation don't fit the real thing...

Link to post
Share on other sites

like this...end of the yr...profit low...she don't sack herself...she also karna sack by others...at least if make money...everyone will still keep quiet....unless she sack herself... [laugh][laugh]

must ask her "backing mountain" permission to be sacked, u think that's possible?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wonder if SMRT do have a set of SOP for this kind of situation...if they have...why didn't they show it or utilise it? unless keeping passenger onboard for a prolong period of time is part of the SOP...or if it is not...then why didn't they activate the crisis plan?

 

the guy on tv say the train still got airflow but just not strong enough so passenger don't feel it...i think he is damm stupid...if no one feels it...even if there really is...it is deem "useless"...i think shoudl also put them in that kind of situation for them to realise the real thing...obviously their imaginary situation don't fit the real thing...

now i know: in business, it is important to retain customers (for repeat business).... SMRT is taking this literally and KEEPS their customers (passengers) as long as possible in their trains/tunnels.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's not forget Singapore Power, SingPost, Comfort Delgro etc.. They used to be govt-own. Today, they are public-listed BUT still govt-own through Temasek Holdings..

 

These companies can milk your money openly and the government can say they can't do anything because they don't own them anymore. However, the govt stands to

benefit from their profit because GOVT->Temasek Holdings.

 

Get it? [;)]

 

Just goes to show MIW has the foresight to know all hell gg to break lose... All become privatize so everything that happens can be a coincidence. If it's too serious then fine them heavily since they need to do something for the public... And for their own pockets...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since almost all is own by government one or another way

Let's say PAP will be voted out in the next election

WP the new ruling party

So all this business will goes to WP or still PAP own?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend from SMRT told me every train is suppose to have spare batteries that can last an hour in case of power failure :huh:

UPS just like our car battery after 2 yrs need to change, if they din test it the result will be when needed it just doesn't power up. Base on real case 1 hour to recover is not possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i blame the govt for

 

1. privatising the public transport to maximise profit out of the expense of citizens

 

2. opening floodgate to increase population so fast that it's affecting the infrastructure (housing, trains, roads, etc)

 

greed and poor planning... thanks PAP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Public Transport should never be privatized. :angry:

 

You should be glad that its privatized.. Lty said if gov own, service would be worst...

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly its jus gonna b wayang. i wonder wat hap to the minister pay review?

 

review cast aside for now.

 

cuz they got a 'serious' problem to attend to. pay review can put one side 1st.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow so tactic so evil so darkness :ph34r:

 

 

Isn't this how some of the world famous dictator rule their country! :angry:

 

Might will rename Tesmasak Holding As LKY and LHL holding. :angry: :angry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...