Johorat 1st Gear September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 http://wikileaks.org/cable/2009/01/09SINGAPORE61.html C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 SINGAPORE 000061 SIPDIS STATE FOR EAP - M. COPPOLA NEW DELHI FOR J. EHRENDREICH E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/14/2029 TAGS: PGOV SOCI PREL SN SUBJECT: JOURNALISTS FRUSTRATED BY PRESS CONTROLS REF: A. SINGAPORE 1143 ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ender Hypersonic September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 I think Lynn Lee career might be in jeopardy.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unidentified 1st Gear September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 I think Lynn Lee career might be in jeopardy.. thats why kana posted to indo that s--t place where chinese girls get raped and killed by those cb indo. http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/home/binus-...d-wallet/461924 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brianjones September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 To TS if I were you I'd delete that post. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubberstamp Neutral Newbie September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 To TS if I were you I'd delete that post. No, you shouldnt delete. It is not written by you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1fast1 Supersonic September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 (edited) Wikileaks continues to impress, but there are no real surprises here. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence and honesty here would've long realised that Sg does not have a free press. Of course, objective evidence like this helps to corner the running dogs (including the rabid pups on this forum) and leave them without wiggle-room to bark "no grounds!" to protect their masters. Edited September 2, 2011 by Turboflat4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darryn Turbocharged September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 To TS if I were you I'd delete that post. Public Info already - why delete? But aside from the names mentioned - this is all stuff that I have heard before. It is a pretty common lament. The only difference is that this time it is coming from senior reporters. Just look at who is the ex head of SPH - and what position he held in gubermint. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johorat 1st Gear September 2, 2011 Author Share September 2, 2011 To TS if I were you I'd delete that post. Why? I didn't defame anyone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadX Moderator September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 Wikileaks continues to impress, but there are no real surprises here. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence and honesty here would've long realised that Sg does not have a free press. Of course, objective evidence like this helps to corner the running dogs (including the rabid pups on this forum) and leave them without wiggle-room to bark "no grounds!" to protect their masters. Where are we now?? 157??? and notice many ppl now no more buying the local papers?? dwindling Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 what so surprising?? most of SEA gahmen control media wor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darryn Turbocharged September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 Wikileaks continues to impress, but there are no real surprises here. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence and honesty here would've long realised that Sg does not have a free press. Of course, objective evidence like this helps to corner the running dogs (including the rabid pups on this forum) and leave them without wiggle-room to bark "no grounds!" to protect their masters. It's pretty disgusting though to release names and stuff like that - these people have careers to build, and to turn them into some sort of political spokesperson without their permission is pretty awful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 It's pretty disgusting though to release names and stuff like that - these people have careers to build, and to turn them into some sort of political spokesperson without their permission is pretty awful. Actually for Wikileak, take it with a pinch of salt. those thing they posted cannot be verify as its like telling ISA to come out and verify their finding. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curahee 1st Gear September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 To TS if I were you I'd delete that post. No need delete, its an open secret, not some report that will cause a big hoo haa... everyone know how the media industry work here, all r controlled in order to brainwash sporean. This report only show us the detail Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porker Turbocharged September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 Where are we now?? 157??? and notice many ppl now no more buying the local papers?? dwindling I only use the papers to collect my dog poo and urine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexToh13 Neutral Newbie September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 No, you shouldnt delete. It is not written by you Can delete post/thread meh? tot only mod can Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1fast1 Supersonic September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 (edited) It's pretty disgusting though to release names and stuff like that - these people have careers to build, and to turn them into some sort of political spokesperson without their permission is pretty awful. While you have a point, remember that these people were not direct sources for Wikileaks, and journalists are only under an ethical obligation to protect their confidential sources. "Tattling" on or spying on, and thereby exposing, others is not considered a breach; in fact, a truly free press is fearlessly and ruthlessly disrespectful of persons, especially those in power or holding some sort of position of responsibility. Yes, these senior journos, editors etc. mentioned by name have careers to build, mouths to feed, etc. But remember that they're doing so by compromising their own personal and professional ethics by working in (and promoting) a dishonest system. They're also complicit in the duplicity the gahmen inflicts upon the populace. Simply put, these guys are part of the problem, and therefore deserve to be exposed - at least their private moments of self-recrimination may prove to have some real value if aired to the world. Edited September 2, 2011 by Turboflat4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felipe 3rd Gear September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 what so surprising?? most of SEA gahmen control media wor. yea, not surprising by a 3rd world style of governance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darryn Turbocharged September 2, 2011 Share September 2, 2011 While you have a point, remember that these people were not direct sources for Wikileaks, and journalists are only under an ethical obligation to protect their confidential sources. "Tattling" on or spying on, and thereby exposing, others is not considered a breach; in fact, a truly free press is fearlessly and ruthlessly disrespectful of persons, especially those in power or holding some sort of position of responsibility. Yes, these senior journos, editors etc. mentioned by name have careers to build, mouths to feed, etc. But remember that they're doing so by compromising their own personal and professional ethics by working in (and promoting) a dishonest system. They're also complicit in the duplicity the gahmen inflicts upon the populace. Simply put, these guys are part of the problem, and therefore deserve to be exposed - at least their private moments of self-recrimination may prove to have some real value if aired to the world. Wow. Just wow. That's a pretty self serving justification. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Future of News Reporting - The Weather Channel
Future of News Reporting - The Weather Channel
media freedom, censorship and cotton sheep...
media freedom, censorship and cotton sheep...
Latest email 'scam'
Latest email 'scam'
SPH to Restructure Media Business into Not-for-Profit Entity
SPH to Restructure Media Business into Not-for-Profit Entity
Which petrol station is giving coupon now? Latest update...
Which petrol station is giving coupon now? Latest update...
Is this the end of the road for NOC?
Is this the end of the road for NOC?
Switch Off Aircon and Media Player before Turning Off Engine
Switch Off Aircon and Media Player before Turning Off Engine
Anyone bought latest Camry Hybrid? Review ho bo?
Anyone bought latest Camry Hybrid? Review ho bo?