Jump to content

Nearly Crash With My Family At CTE


Gdspd08
 Share

Recommended Posts

To this stupid P Plate van at CTE today, either you go retake your driving license or you you have missed the 7th month mono intake...

I am driving home with my wife and my two years old kid back from Mount Alvernia as my son is very sick for two days..U nearly make my whole family gone by crashing to the incoming car from my right lane.

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

To this stupid P Plate van at CTE today, either you go retake your driving license or you you have missed the 7th month mono intake...

I am driving home with my wife and my two years old kid back from Mount Alvernia as my son is very sick for two days..U nearly make my whole family gone by crashing to the incoming car from my right lane.

 

 

He was in wrong, but it also looks like you were kinda slow to anitcipate what he was doing...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wah you very heng.

That euro van on your right lucky never hit you.

 

I think that euro van also will be telling his friend, about his close shaved with TS car. And might be cursing TS for cutting into his lane and almost causing a crash.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Van drivers have to literally stick their head out of the window to check blind spot so maybe he really din see you. But on the other hand that's not an excuse to just chiong out of lane la quite irresponsible. Drive safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To this stupid P Plate van at CTE today, either you go retake your driving license or you you have missed the 7th month mono intake...

I am driving home with my wife and my two years old kid back from Mount Alvernia as my son is very sick for two days..U nearly make my whole family gone by crashing to the incoming car from my right lane.

 

 

From the video I saw u swerving ur car to the right lane while avoiding a van from cutting from ur left, thus the van who seemed to be going straight swerved and overtook u, rather than what u had said?

 

Care to explain?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He was in wrong, but it also looks like you were kinda slow to anitcipate what he was doing...

First reaction is to avoid but is wrong.

If that TS had paid attention to this surroundings at all times, he will not move out from his own lane and would had brake to avoid.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To this stupid P Plate van at CTE today, either you go retake your driving license or you you have missed the 7th month mono intake...

I am driving home with my wife and my two years old kid back from Mount Alvernia as my son is very sick for two days..U nearly make my whole family gone by crashing to the incoming car from my right lane.

 

 

U shud have crashed in him and claim him or jam brake.. Rather than u swerve and the van beside u crash into u, u are at a losing end...

Link to post
Share on other sites

He was in wrong, but it also looks like you were kinda slow to anitcipate what he was doing...

TS is not slow, he just wants to be in front of the silver van................whatever it takes

Link to post
Share on other sites

U shud have crashed in him and claim him or jam brake.. Rather than u swerve and the van beside u crash into u, u are at a losing end...

dont talk big lah .....you dare to crash 1st then come in and brag

Link to post
Share on other sites

He was in wrong, but it also looks like you were kinda slow to anitcipate what he was doing...

 

His boy was sick and he was probably just trying to concentrating on driving straight and observing basic road rules, not anticipating this kind of sudden stunt manoeuver from the stupid van.

 

This is why i am a champion for switching on headlights even in the day. LTA should make all vehicles in Singapore install daytime running lights or at least compulsory to switch on headlights 24/7, like they do in certain countries.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First reaction is to avoid but is wrong.

If that TS had paid attention to this surroundings at all times, he will not move out from his own lane and would had brake to avoid.

 

From the video, i thought it was too late to brake. It was either he hits the van cutting into his lane, or take a chance and swerve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

U shud have crashed in him and claim him or jam brake.. Rather than u swerve and the van beside u crash into u, u are at a losing end...

 

he got family la.

 

but actually, with this video, if he bang the van, insurance wont do stunt right?

 

coz its sudden swerve with no signal

Link to post
Share on other sites

His boy was sick and he was probably just trying to concentrating on driving straight and observing basic road rules, not anticipating this kind of sudden stunt manoeuver from the stupid van.

 

This is why i am a champion for switching on headlights even in the day. LTA should make all vehicles in Singapore install daytime running lights or at least compulsory to switch on headlights 24/7, like they do in certain countries.

 

DRLs are too "glaring" or so people complain. thats why aftermarket DRLs are banned

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agreed though. What TS did is not exactly appropriate considering there is a van on the other lane (I believe he took evasive action to avoid TS).

 

Thus even if TS wants to change lane to avoid, should still look first.

 

I can understand because I face such situations several times already. Veh changing lanes w/o looking. Thus I have learn to anticipate and look around me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very very very common..... And cabs love to do that.......

 

Driving daily on jalan besar, serangoon road, kallang road, your responses will be sharpened by these cab drivers who do that all the time. Now i just anticipate what the guys in the lanes either side of me are going to do and get read to brake... 9/10 time i would be right.... But that 1/10 time might kill me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DRLs are too "glaring" or so people complain. thats why aftermarket DRLs are banned

 

Glaring is better than not knowing there is a car in the next lane. At least people know there is a car coming in the next lane and not suka suka shoot out like that. LTA should consider that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glaring is better than not knowing there is a car in the next lane. At least people know there is a car coming in the next lane and not suka suka shoot out like that. LTA should consider that.

 

garing=not safe (by LTA)

 

stock DRLs are tested thats y allowed.

 

go check onemotoring.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...