Jump to content

SPP, SDP criticise timing of announcement


Iisterry
 Share

Recommended Posts

So... How will TPL fare without SM GCT?

 

SPP, SDP criticise timing of announcement

By Tessa Wong

 

TWO opposition parties have criticised Singapore's two former prime ministers for the timing of the announcement that they are leaving the Cabinet.

 

Said Mr Chiam See Tong, secretary-general of the Singapore People's Party (SPP): 'The question is: Why now, and not five years later? I think MM and SM owe an explanation to the public on this point.'

 

It is the 'fair' thing to do, Mr Chiam added, arguing that the outcome of the polls would probably have been different if voters had known before the election that Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong, 69, and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew, 87, were planning to step down as ministers.

 

His party would probably have won in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, he said, and added: 'In Marine Parade, they would not have gotten in if Goh Chok Tong was stepping down.'

 

Mr Goh's People's Action Party team won the GRC, beating a National Solidarity Party team.

 

Like many Singaporeans, Mr Chiam was taken by surprise when he heard the news, he told reporters at an SPP event in Bishan Park.

 

On Saturday, about a week after the election, SM Goh and MM Lee announced their desire to depart, so as to give Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his team a 'fresh, clean slate' to carry Singapore forward.

 

At a separate event in Ghim Moh, a member of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) who contested in the recent polls called on PM Lee to be 'fair' to voters by holding by-elections in the GRCs helmed by the two ministers.

 

Said Mr Tan Jee Say, whose team lost in Holland-Bukit Timah GRC: 'Voters of Tanjong Pagar and Marine Parade may have voted for (MM Lee and SM Goh) on the basis that they continue to be Cabinet ministers.

 

'Now that they have stepped down, shouldn't by-elections be held?'

 

Mr Tan, who was SM Goh's principal private secretary from 1985 to 1990, also called for the two ministers to step down from other public sector positions.

 

'If they're really serious about giving their new leadership a free hand, they should step down from all government positions, including GIC,' said Mr Tan.

 

MM Lee chairs the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation, a sovereign wealth fund, while SM Goh is chairman of financial regulator Monetary Authority of Singapore.

 

Later, the SDP said on its website: 'If the motivation is for the younger generation to take over the leadership of politics in Singapore, Mr Lee Kuan Yew should completely retire from the political scene.

 

'The clean break would truly signal a new beginning for politics in Singapore and for democracy to start its belated development.'

 

The party also called for the two positions, as well as that of ministers in the Prime Minister's Office, to be abolished. It estimated such a move would save the Government $15 million a year in salaries, which it said could go to helping the needy.

 

The SDP also said the MM and SM posts have 'served no useful purpose except to drain the national budget'.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

your point being? Stepping down from cabinet doesnt mean relinquishing his MP post. Come on. Get your facts right first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your point being? Stepping down from cabinet doesnt mean relinquishing his MP post. Come on. Get your facts right first.

 

Que being. SM GCT.

 

Now he will be MP GCT.

 

They have always touted cabinet appointments as one of the main drawing factor why a voter should vote for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah. if SM Goh becomes MP Goh, i tink MP residents may not have voted him in and subsequently TPL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sekali the pmo create more positions to fulfill the voters calls for more job creation

 

Deputy Minister without portfolio in the pmo office

Assistant deputy minister without portfolio in the pmo office

Deputy assistant to the assistant deputy minister without portfolio in the pmo office

senior secretary to the Deputy Minister without portfolio in the pmo office

deputy senior secretary to the Deputy Minister without portfolio in the pmo office

assistant senior secretary to the Deputy Minister without portfolio in the pmo office

.....so on....

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

MP boh power ma ! Imagine , MP GCT ask for upgrading of lifts , PM say NO ! what can he do ?

Edited by Jasonjst
Link to post
Share on other sites

sekali the pmo create more positions to fulfill the voters calls for more job creation

 

Deputy Minister without portfolio in the pmo office

Assistant deputy minister without portfolio in the pmo office

Deputy assistant to the assistant deputy minister without portfolio in the pmo office

senior secretary to the Deputy Minister without portfolio in the pmo office

deputy senior secretary to the Deputy Minister without portfolio in the pmo office

assistant senior secretary to the Deputy Minister without portfolio in the pmo office

.....so on....

 

Previously it was this headcount. Now it is unclear.

 

tabulation.jpg

 

 

 

Source

Link to post
Share on other sites

MP boh power ma ! Imagine , MP GCT ask for upgrading of lifts , PM say NO ! what can he do ?

 

Join the opposition [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

MP boh power ma ! Imagine , MP GCT ask for upgrading of lifts , PM say NO ! what can he do ?

 

Ask TPL for help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

Some will never be pleased with PAP in power. Thus, anything could be picked on. Listen and have a good laugh lor [:p]

Edited by Andrewl
Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

MP boh power ma ! Imagine , MP GCT ask for upgrading of lifts , PM say NO ! what can he do ?

 

looking at the power divide, looks more and more this is likely scenario [;)]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged

They should ask the people of MP & TP whether they feel "betrayed" b'cos of the sudden change, whether not having a cabinet minster would affect their choice of vote.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should ask the people of MP & TP whether they feel "betrayed" b'cos of the sudden change, whether not having a cabinet minster would affect their choice of vote.

 

 

Let the people in MP who voted for PAP repent for the next 5 years.

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...