I am a supporter of PAP

[Good-Carbuyer]

  On 5/2/2011 at 8:40 AM, Jchuacl said:

I'm not being presumptuous but stating a fact that hurts. To each is his own , and I don't see the pt to tell pple whose mind is set that living in the dark is better than in the light.

Like drink-driving can hurt other innocent road-users?

[Rubberstamp]

  On 5/2/2011 at 10:13 AM, Piyopico said:

Whatever. Compassion itz not one your traits.

 

I go play with my two doggies now.

 

 

 

playing with dogs do not make one more compassionate

[Good-Carbuyer]

  On 5/2/2011 at 8:42 AM, Duckduck said:

theres nothing wrong with voting for p@p, but it is giving them the confidence that citizens are happy that theres no solution to the low birth rate such that we cannot replace ourselves for the future.

 

This means 2-3 decades down the road, there will not be enough young Singaporeans to support economic growth, means they have to bring in more young FTs to address this issue.

 

At the current rate of birth, if you think theres alot of FTs here now, there will be ALOT more in future, because we arent having enough children as citizens. In future, there will be alot of old SIngaporeans & alot more young FTs.

 

My gripe is that we are contributing to the current government and economy, for the future of young FTs in future, not young SIngaporeans coz of our current low birth rate.

 

If p@P doesnt fix this current problem, I have problems supporting them.

 

So garmen's solution is convert more FTs to citizens next time right? So why the fark should we sacrifice ourselves now, for the future of foreigners?

They tought we not aware of the mistakes they made over the years, thinking those are good performance records (laugh).

[Yeshe]

  On 5/2/2011 at 8:08 AM, Carben68 said:

You are suggesting that we give a chance to someone who hasn't done it before so that they can then have a track record? I am not keen to bet my family's future so that someone can have a better resume....

 

so u mean all those new P8P candidates has track records? but like it or not, they just get into parliment by the GRC backdoor system

[Good-Carbuyer]

  On 5/2/2011 at 8:44 AM, Carben68 said:

Ouch.. that does hurt... because I am pro-PAP (well, almost 85% pro), I am living in the dark? Interesting perspective..

Do not worry, we all can learn somehow. I also recently graduated from where you were.

[Good-Carbuyer]

  On 5/2/2011 at 8:45 AM, Tonyng said:

You echoed my fear too.

 

FT immigration caused transport problems. We are able to see this and with this election it became an issue.

 

But there are unseen arenas that they will compete. And effect takes years to manifest. An important one is education. Places in our own universities. Scholarships.

 

Already happening. Not emphasized enough in this election.

 

I think we would need to start saving for them an overseas education.

 

Somebody must speak out this problem in Parliament before it is too late.

Solution: First step: never vote those who introduced Gangsters-Rob-Citizens to bar us from votin for the candidate of the citizens' choice.

[Yeshe]

  On 5/2/2011 at 8:20 AM, RadX said:

sadly.....it is indeed $$$ that talks...and that is where we are losing our soul....

I may not be rich, but $$$ is one of my least worries......sad to say, for a lot of ppl, it is their MAIN worry

 

then who is ? [laugh]

[RadX]

  On 5/2/2011 at 10:22 AM, Yeshe said:

then who is ?

 

THOSE FELLAS IN CABINET LOR

[Gearoil]

Why is the PAP facing such great opposition for this election.....

 

BECOS THEY HAVE BECUM MUCH TOO ARROGANT!!......

 

AND WAY TOO UNACCOUNTABLE FOR HAVE THEY HAD DONE!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[RadX]

  On 5/2/2011 at 10:23 AM, Gearoil said:

Why is the PAP facing such great opposition for this election.....

 

BECOS THEY HAVE BECUM MUCH TOO ARROGANT!!......

 

AND WAY TOO UNACCOUNTABLE FOR HAVE THEY HAD DONE!!

 

 

eh u still alive ah.....thot you cremated al??

 

 

[Good-Carbuyer]

  On 5/2/2011 at 8:47 AM, FromA2B said:

Everyone I talk to, do not like GRC since the day it started. PAP should know it, but they have not done anything about it. Of all the policies (if one can call this policy), removing GRC is the easiest one to do. I guess it is even safe to conclude the Removing GRC is wanted by the majority of the People, Wanted by the People.

 

GRC is typically helmed by a "solid" candidate with 3 or 4 other less-equiped candidate. The Oppo now deploy the same strategy. Whether the incumbent or rival won, this system only served to give this impression.

 

I believe this simple gesture will win back a lot of credibility.

 

but pls, do not make a big big big SMC....:)

Never vote for people who introduced Gangsters-Rob-Citizens of the citizens' rights to vote the candidate of the citizens' choice.

[Yeshe]

  On 5/2/2011 at 8:24 AM, Deividz said:

I have mediocre results 10 years ago.

 

Thank God, I was still able to enter local govt Uni. My bro-i-law got better results, sadly must go SIM.

 

I am doing alright in my career and that's because I was given an opportunity.

 

Will your children or grandchildren have this opportunity?

 

I am the lucky one who got married around the 08-09 recession time.

 

Got my high but still reasonable pigeon hole in Punggol at 280k

 

Got my car before COE spike

 

Got my job before the foreigners came in.....

 

Now I look at my friends who are graduating soon, I really feel for them.

 

I look at my daughter and I fear for her future coz she might not be top 3 in her class.

 

Perhaps top 10 might not be good enough in future too.

 

I just want her to have a childhood and not have endless tuition and enrichment classes from 7 years old onwards.

 

So I hope to have a group of leaders who will put our children and us first and I hope you will too.

 

If you think the PAP is going to do that, then vote for them.

 

 

Stauch PAP Supporter 1978 - 2011 Jan (RIP)

 

bro, i feel wat u said. when u become a parent, the priorities in life changed and u will want the best for your kids.

 

[Ender]

  On 5/2/2011 at 10:23 AM, Gearoil said:

Why is the PAP facing such great opposition for this election.....

 

BECOS THEY HAVE BECUM MUCH TOO ARROGANT!!......

 

AND WAY TOO UNACCOUNTABLE FOR HAVE THEY HAD DONE!!

 

I seldom agree with you on anything, but this post very gam tia.

[RadX]

  On 5/2/2011 at 10:25 AM, Ender said:

I seldom agree with you on anything, but this post very gam tia.

 

well...at this juncture...even our enemies becum our frens

[Albeniz]

  On 5/2/2011 at 10:23 AM, Gearoil said:

Why is the PAP facing such great opposition for this election.....

 

BECOS THEY HAVE BECUM MUCH TOO ARROGANT!!......

 

AND WAY TOO UNACCOUNTABLE FOR HAVE THEY HAD DONE!!

 

This is one of the best post, Gearoil.

Listen already, feel very "Song" ah!

[Piyopico]

  On 5/2/2011 at 10:15 AM, Rubberstamp said:

playing with dogs do not make one more compassionate

 

 

 

 

[RadX]

  On 5/2/2011 at 10:27 AM, Albeniz said:

This is one of the best post, Gearoil.

Listen already, feel very "Song" ah!

 

'I LIKE'

[Good-Carbuyer]

  On 5/2/2011 at 8:53 AM, Csnewbie said:

i said before.

 

i think GRC is formed becos ruling party is not able to field enough CREDIBLE CANDIDATES.

 

Look at how many good ones go to the oppositions now.

 

 

i think GRC is formed to pursue PAP's selfish motives. :angry:

 

Thus am i rite to say many able men don't relate to PAP's policies?

You got the point. You are right. The weaker they are in their opinion, the bigger their GRC membership (I only got two supporter, or I would had wanted to contest the biggest GRC). I belive I can be PM candidate (typical OMO)