Most Eloquent and angry speech from WP's Png Eng huat!

[Jolie888]

Can we understand that the PAP betrayed me, and not that I have changed my support for them?

Hmmmm ... a political party betrayed you?

Now, that's very interesting indeed!

[Without_a_car]

So sorry, you may be aware that PAP is the opposition in Hougang at the moment. So if you are refering to WP as the opposition, we are likely to be misunderstood. So far so good with your proposition/opposition? (no ministers with corruption record like PAP). Can we understand that the PAP betrayed me, and not that I have changed my support for them?

 

politicians saying one thing during elections and doing another after elections is normal

even the lightening is no exception... it's nothing personal... don't take it so hard

 

[Good-Carbuyer]

Hmmmm ... a political party betrayed you?

Now, that's very interesting indeed!

What a sour-grape

[Good-Carbuyer]

politicians saying one thing during elections and doing another after elections is normal

even the lightening is no exception... it's nothing personal... don't take it so hard

You may be aware that the introduction of GRC robs citizens off our rights to elect suitable candidates (some PAP candidates were already charged with corruption in the past). Given the choice, I believe we would not had wanted to vote them in at all (PAP's A-team got such calibre)

[Albeniz]

You may be aware that the introduction of GRC robs citizens off our rights to elect suitable candidates (some PAP candidates were already charged with corruption in the past). Given the choice, I believe we would not had wanted to vote them in at all (PAP's A-team got such calibre)

 

We are a small country and yet still need to group the constituencies together to form GRC.

 

Yeah, might as well combine all the 87 seats together to form one big GRC and vote one shot, this way, there is no need to redraw the boundary every 5 years.

[Without_a_car]

You may be aware that the introduction of GRC robs citizens off our rights to elect suitable candidates (some PAP candidates were already charged with corruption in the past). Given the choice, I believe we would not had wanted to vote them in at all (PAP's A-team got such calibre)

 

even after robbing your of your rights, they still lose 1 GRC...

no amount gerrymandering can help bad policy making...

slowly but surely

[Good-Carbuyer]

We are a small country and yet still need to group the constituencies together to form GRC.

 

Yeah, might as well combine all the 87 seats together to form one big GRC and vote one shot, this way, there is no need to redraw the boundary every 5 years.

You got the point. You are right. However, our concern would be the one and only MP be corrupted, how?

[Mllcg]

We are a small country and yet still need to group the constituencies together to form GRC.

 

Yeah, might as well combine all the 87 seats together to form one big GRC and vote one shot, this way, there is no need to redraw the boundary every 5 years.

 

the most logical/fair way is to have 87 SMCs

Edited May 12, 2012 by Mllcg

[Good-Carbuyer]

even after robbing your of your rights, they still lose 1 GRC...

no amount gerrymandering can help bad policy making...

slowly but surely

So sorry, are you a foreigner (the way you put it seems a little strange to me, or I am sensitive). I mean we are robbing ourselves the opportunities to elect candidates less likely to be corrupted than those four.

[Without_a_car]

So sorry, are you a foreigner (the way you put it seems a little strange to me, or I am sensitive). I mean we are robbing ourselves the opportunities to elect candidates less likely to be corrupted than those four.

 

true pink singaporean