Wt_know Supersonic November 30, 2010 Share November 30, 2010 (edited) how come no jailterm for this kind of crime ? fine is just sup sup sui for them as they make tons of $$$ from the said crime 78 similars charges considered ... that sums up everything. Dealer evaded GST by claiming phones were damaged By Elena Chong A BUSINESSMAN evaded $182,000 in goods and services tax (GST) by pretending the mobile phones he imported from China were damaged. . . . He was fined $212,000 yesterday after pleading guilty to 20 charges of incorrectly declaring mobile phone values, helping to obstruct customs officers and failing to retain trade documents. He faces 106 weeks' jail if he fails to pay the fine. . . . Yeo, who had 78 similar charges considered, could have been jailed for up to a year and/or fined on each charge. He could also have been fined up to $10,000 or the amount of duty and GST involved, whichever was greater. Edited November 30, 2010 by Wt_know ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged November 30, 2010 Share November 30, 2010 how come no jailterm for this kind of crime ? fine is just sup sup sui for them as they make tons of $$$ from the said crime 78 similars charges considered ... that sums up everything. Dealer evaded GST by claiming phones were damaged By Elena Chong A BUSINESSMAN evaded $182,000 in goods and services tax (GST) by pretending the mobile phones he imported from China were damaged. . . . He was fined $212,000 yesterday after pleading guilty to 20 charges of incorrectly declaring mobile phone values, helping to obstruct customs officers and failing to retain trade documents. He faces 106 weeks' jail if he fails to pay the fine. . . . Yeo, who had 78 similar charges considered, could have been jailed for up to a year and/or fined on each charge. He could also have been fined up to $10,000 or the amount of duty and GST involved, whichever was greater. Where is the link?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zniper 2nd Gear November 30, 2010 Share November 30, 2010 he evaded $182,000 but was fine only $212,000...? extra of $40k only... tink tis $40k is only to cover the duties of the force and the judge.... like tat tink more and more such tings will happen cos to them additional $40k on top of their taxes is noting!!! ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Wads the fine for parking opposite continuos white line?
Wads the fine for parking opposite continuos white line?
Johor "safe beyond doubt" and Singaporeans not crime targets
Johor "safe beyond doubt" and Singaporeans not crime targets
Law Misconceptions in SG
Law Misconceptions in SG
Whiter than white? Christopher De Souza
Whiter than white? Christopher De Souza
Bill allowing police to collect DNA from more people passed as MPs sound privacy, security concerns
Bill allowing police to collect DNA from more people passed as MPs sound privacy, security concerns
Crime doesn't pay, neither does being a Vigilante
Crime doesn't pay, neither does being a Vigilante
Judge grants bid by undergrad facing toilet filming charges to leave Singapore for top British university
Judge grants bid by undergrad facing toilet filming charges to leave Singapore for top British university
Owning digital plans to 3D-print guns without licence to be made a crime
Owning digital plans to 3D-print guns without licence to be made a crime