Who is DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE (MSK's LAPSES)?

[Yahgo22]

Many million of MAN-HOURS were wasted.

 

Many ORGANISATIONS were involved in putting up MSK fotos. (HDB, Town Councils, Pte Condos & etc)

 

Thousand of MOTORISTS who were crossings the 2 chechpoints. (Cars, lorries, trailers & so on)

 

So much PETROL were wasted cos of the LONG JAM.

 

Plus so many others that were not mentioned above.

 

Now The BIG QUESTION IS ??

 

 

Who is RESPONSIBLE for NOT HAVING MSK relative house UNDER SURVEILLANCE??

 

1} Mr CAN'T SING

2) Commssioner of Police

3) Director of CID

4) Head of ISD

 

A veteran crime buster, Mr Lionel De Souza was quoted in today ST forum that,

 

IT IS NOT UNCOMMON FOR HIGH PROFILE CRIMINALS TO SEEK REFUGE IN

THEIR CLOSE RELATIVES HOUSE BEFORE PICKING THE RIGHT TIME TO FLEE TO A

SAFER HAVEN.

 

Could this oversight was made becos of the lack of experiences by all the many

SCHOLARS MATAS in the various important departments in the SPF?

 

How about re-engaging all those OLD SCHOOL CRIME BUSTERS like Mr De Souza and many

other big name ORANG LAMA MATA as CONSULTANTS or TRAINERS for our SPF??

Edited November 24, 2010 by Yahgo22

[Blackyv]

Cannot, they are not scholar, no paper, how can they be consultant?

[Dpsk]

option 1

[Yahgo22]

option 1

 

 

 

Did u mean Mr Cant Sing?

 

How about a poll?

 

} Mr CAN'T SING

2) Commssioner of Police

3) Director of CID

4) Head of ISD

 

Can someone help to design a poll so that we can know what are our opinions?

Edited November 24, 2010 by Yahgo22

[Joseph22]

  On 11/24/2010 at 12:26 AM, Dpsk said:

option 1

 

If you are saying directly responsible. it wont be cant sing lah.

 

its the slack officers in charge.

[Watwheels]

He has already moved on. I wonder what good will it do by asking this question when obviously "the war" is over. Someone with intelligence should ask this question during his escape and not when everything is over.

[Bismarck]

Someone has started a group in Facebook.

 

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=8822102707

[Ahhuat]

  On 11/24/2010 at 12:37 AM, Joseph22 said:

If you are saying directly responsible. it wont be cant sing lah.

 

its the slack officers in charge.

 

whose responsibility is it to prevent the existence of slack officers in charge? i didnt vote for the officers....

 

[Ahhuat]

  On 11/24/2010 at 12:26 AM, Dpsk said:

option 1

 

how nice that he was whisked away to become SM and then they announce this so Shanmugam has to be the bearer of bad news. it's not like they just realised this yesterday!?!

[Kiadaw]

I don't need a veteran Crime Buster to tell me a criminal is likely to find help from his family members & close friends.

 

Activate thousands of manpower from police & army, & station so many sentries, people burning weekends, & they didn't bother to even look at this brother place.

 

& after that, still give excuses that he had 100 plus relatives, hence cannot search all, we didn't even ask them to search all, but surely you would have think they at least search his brother house. So is this is how our government acts. Giving excuses. At least admit to your mistake lah!

Edited November 24, 2010 by Kiadaw

[Thug]

They gonna say 5) The window...

[Ahtong]

TS, you like cappucino, latte, expresso, kopi-o ....?

[Hutan]

  On 11/24/2010 at 12:09 AM, Yahgo22 said:

Many million of MAN-HOURS were wasted.

 

Many ORGANISATIONS were involved in putting up MSK fotos. (HDB, Town Councils, Pte Condos & etc)

 

Thousand of MOTORISTS who were crossings the 2 chechpoints. (Cars, lorries, trailers & so on)

 

So much PETROL were wasted cos of the LONG JAM.

 

Plus so many others that were not mentioned above.

 

Now The BIG QUESTION IS ??

 

 

Who is RESPONSIBLE for NOT HAVING MSK relative house UNDER SURVEILLANCE??

 

1} Mr CAN'T SING

2) Commssioner of Police

3) Director of CID

4) Head of ISD

 

A veteran crime buster, Mr Lionel De Souza was quoted in today ST forum that,

 

IT IS NOT UNCOMMON FOR HIGH PROFILE CRIMINALS TO SEEK REFUGE IN

THEIR CLOSE RELATIVES HOUSE BEFORE PICKING THE RIGHT TIME TO FLEE TO A

SAFER HAVEN.

 

Could this oversight was made becos of the lack of experiences by all the many

SCHOLARS MATAS in the various important departments in the SPF?

 

How about re-engaging all those OLD SCHOOL CRIME BUSTERS like Mr De Souza and many

other big name ORANG LAMA MATA as CONSULTANTS or TRAINERS for our SPF??

 

according to the BOSS...the answe is U...and we all

[Ecaf]

While they are not directly responsible for the security lapses, i personally feel all the wasted man-hour and long traffic jams at the causeway could have been easily avoided had the family member turned him in (if they really did give him shelter and assistance).

 

Just my humble opinion.

[Yahgo22]

In fact all the MPs and ministers should direct this question to

 

Mr Cant Sing and not K Shammugam.

 

 

Can our Finance Minister enlighten us how much $$$ were spent

to track down this LIMPING MAN?

Edited November 24, 2010 by Yahgo22

[Joseph22]

  On 11/24/2010 at 1:15 AM, Ahhuat said:

whose responsibility is it to prevent the existence of slack officers in charge? i didnt vote for the officers....

 

 

the officer superior.

 

commision of police main job is to look at bigger picture.

 

in the same way. you dont expect the CEO of a MNC to know which warehouse storeman is slacking right?

[Forte3737]

  On 11/24/2010 at 2:03 AM, Yahgo22 said:

In fact all the MPs and ministers should direct this question to

 

Mr Cant Sing and not K Shammugam.

 

 

Can our Finance Minister enlighten us how much $$$ were spent

to track down this LIMPING MAN?

 

 

the $$ spent is not important, without can't sing and company, would you be alive now? maybe you could be blown to pieces by the limping man.

[Stkm1234]

5) all of the above