SingTel & Starhub Secure Rights To Broadcast World Cup

[Damienic]

won't lose money one la..at most made lower than expected profits..

[Vextan]

why is no one grateful towards singtel and starhub for spending so much money to bid for the telecast rights ? clearly they are making a loss, but are doing this out of social responsibility . i estimate their bid amount to be $100 million conservatively, if you multiply say, 100,000 subscribers by $88, it is barely $10 million. come on guys, at least try to see their good intention.

Edited May 8, 2010 by Vextan

[Youaredie]

Actually if they say pay 66, but its 3D broadcast, then I don't mind man. Standard definition for 66 is just nutz.

[Hao80]

why is no one grateful towards singtel and starhub for spending so much money to bid for the telecast rights ? clearly they are making a loss, but are doing this out of social responsibility . i estimate their bid amount to be $100 million conservatively, if you multiply say, 100,000 subscribers by $88, it is barely $10 million. come on guys, at least try to see their good intention.

 

If its too exp. Then don't bring it in, serious. What will happen next 4 years ? $66 * 4 ?

 

They can always allows us to watch RCTI or RTM1

 

There is never social responsibility for this bidding.. Purely business decision.

 

Imagine the loss revenue over beer and sports wear companies advertising fee.

 

Singapore Pools will have a harder time with soccer betting..

Edited May 8, 2010 by Hao80

[Jp66]

why is no one grateful towards singtel and starhub for spending so much money to bid for the telecast rights ? clearly they are making a loss, but are doing this out of social responsibility . i estimate their bid amount to be $100 million conservatively, if you multiply say, 100,000 subscribers by $88, it is barely $10 million. come on guys, at least try to see their good intention.

Good intention????

 

The red one - Singtel, is to suck your BLOOD

 

The green one - Starhub - suck until you 'min cin cin' (face green green)

[Jman888]

why is no one grateful towards singtel and starhub for spending so much money to bid for the telecast rights ? clearly they are making a loss, but are doing this out of social responsibility . i estimate their bid amount to be $100 million conservatively, if you multiply say, 100,000 subscribers by $88, it is barely $10 million. come on guys, at least try to see their good intention.

 

 

their mind is all about $$$, if they are not doing it half heartedly, they should have clinched the deal earlier and get more sponsor, this proved that SG are not really into sport thingy, any sport related activities must tie with $$

[Carpood]

money sucking b******s

[Nephilim]

why is no one grateful towards singtel and starhub for spending so much money to bid for the telecast rights ? clearly they are making a loss, but are doing this out of social responsibility . i estimate their bid amount to be $100 million conservatively, if you multiply say, 100,000 subscribers by $88, it is barely $10 million. come on guys, at least try to see their good intention.

 

We can try to see from their point of business, but excuse me? "Good intentions" from corporations answerable to shareholders?

 

[LoverofCar]

LET MAKE THIS BOYCOTT A WAY TO MAKE THEM WAKE UP....HOPE THEY LOST $ ON THIS!! Edited May 9, 2010 by LoverofCar