Jump to content

Dropping-jail-term-a-one-off-Judge

Bluepica

By Bluepica,
in Lite & EZ

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hermitage

Hermitage

1st Gear

Shouldn't repeat offenders get heavier?

 

http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/EDC10...a-one-off-Judge

 

Yes, I agree that the penalty should've been heavier. And I think her excuse about having to get a toy for her kid is a ridiculous one! The kid apparently demanded a toy which resulted in her infringement. WTF man?!?! If that was my kid, I would've slapped some sense into him/her!! Utter nonsense [mad] !

Link to post
Share on other sites
KapitanE

KapitanE

1st Gear

Yes, I agree that the penalty should've been heavier. And I think her excuse about having to get a toy for her kid is a ridiculous one! The kid apparently demanded a toy which resulted in her infringement. WTF man?!?! If that was my kid, I would've slapped some sense into him/her!! Utter nonsense [mad] !

 

and then be charged with child abuse....

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Robo

Robo

2nd Gear

u hear the name and see the occupation of the hb can be pass of as an elite liao.

garment protects the elite...

 

the a known secret.

 

u see if a peasant like us kenna. cmf sit long long fine big big la

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hermitage

Hermitage

1st Gear

and then be charged with child abuse....

 

Wen lah! If everytime your kid demands for a toy, you must immediately get it for him/her then how? Cannot bring children up lidat what. Must slap some sense into them...just leave out the bruises [sly]

Link to post
Share on other sites
Seaweed

Seaweed

1st Gear

"""Justice V K Rajah decided to set aside the jail sentence, saying that Peter was not likely to repeat the offence""""

 

When I read this...The first question that came to my mind was how come Justice Rajah can be so sure that Peter will not repeat the offence?? Her license was gone for drink driving....now she drove without a license...it basically already proof that she can commit any offence when required to do so!!!

 

And by saying not likely to repeat the offence...Can we assume the offence = driving without license only...so if she commit other offense like riding a motorbike etc without a license....Justice Rajah is not wrong either because she didn't commit the same offence but rather another kind of offence....

 

Did the reporter miss out on some facts or it is purposely excluded so that I can work out my brain this morning ????

 

[laugh][laugh][laugh][laugh][laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites
KapitanE

KapitanE

1st Gear

Ang Mo tua ki, but this one tua liap..... [laugh][laugh]

 

how you know ang moh??? we have many with angmoh sounding name, but turned out to be orr per... eurasian with indian mixed blood...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1l0v3you

1l0v3you

Clutched

Wen lah! If everytime your kid demands for a toy, you must immediately get it for him/her then how? Cannot bring children up lidat what. Must slap some sense into them...just leave out the bruises [sly]

haha..

i think she's just using her kid as an excuse.

does she need to present the reciept to justify her claims?

 

must beat at the cannot see places one.

eg. backside or thighs.

 

that's what my mum do last time hahaha..

sometimes if beat wrong places i will wear long sleeves for a week.

then i good girl and recover for few days.

then the next week must wear long sleeve again LOL.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Damienic

Damienic

5th Gear
(edited)

Yes, I agree that the penalty should've been heavier. And I think her excuse about having to get a toy for her kid is a ridiculous one! The kid apparently demanded a toy which resulted in her infringement. WTF man?!?! If that was my kid, I would've slapped some sense into him/her!! Utter nonsense [mad] !

 

慈母多败儿。Nowadays I dunno what are the parents thinking. They can go all out to lavish love on their children in an excessive manner. No toy will die meh? Knowing very well she was convicted before and still wanna risk it just because the kid want a toy.Its not like its going to be life threatening if the kid cannot get his toy in time??! Cannot wait for husband to come back first before buying the toy meh? Seriously the reason for being repeat offender in this case is unacceptable..If the kid was in this case stricken with high fever or what and she have no choice but to rush him to A&E or what and break the laws again, then still got nothing to say..[shakehead]

Edited by Damienic
Link to post
Share on other sites
Tonyhawk

Tonyhawk

1st Gear

how to appeal???? already go to Justice V K Rajah liao

 

? district court appeal to high court, further appeal to Court of Appeal?

 

im not sure, but you mean to say V K Rajah exclusively hears Court of Appeal cases?

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...