Jolie888 Clutched January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 Does that means those car having less rpm at 100km/h saves more petrol while traveling long distances? I don't think so. To achieve a lower RPM for any given speed, you'd need a higher torque to be developed on equivalent RPM. To achieve that, you'd need a larger capacity NA engine, or a forced induction engine ... both ways, you will need to burn more fuel for equivalent km travelled, at the same speed. Nothing comes for free in this physical world of energy and mass conservation. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepica 4th Gear January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 I don't think so. To achieve a lower RPM for any given speed, you'd need a higher torque to be developed on equivalent RPM. To achieve that, you'd need a larger capacity NA engine, or a forced induction engine ... both ways, you will need to burn more fuel for equivalent km travelled, at the same speed. Nothing comes for free in this physical world of energy and mass conservation. hmmm... some say yes, some say no.... whatabout compare apple to apple... I mean for a given 1.6AT/CVT ... one RPM 2k 100km/h , another RPM 2.8k 100km/h... definitely the latter saves more right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alechi 2nd Gear January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 More gears ... lower rpm @ high speed ... more fuel economical Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben5266 Supercharged January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 Yes. When the engine capacity is bigger and more powerful, the highest gear ratio can be lowered further to achieve lower rpm and the car can go faster. But if the engine is small and less power, having too low ratio will give no power to pull/push the car. 4AT will have limited ratio number to play with because if put to low, the car will have no power to accelerate. Put too high (close to 3rd gear) will limit its top speed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 hmmm... some say yes, some say no.... whatabout compare apple to apple... I mean for a given 1.6AT/CVT ... one RPM 2k 100km/h , another RPM 2.8k 100km/h... definitely the latter saves more right? you mean the former saves more right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 (edited) Yes. When the engine capacity is bigger and more powerful, the highest gear ratio can be lowered further to achieve lower rpm and the car can go faster. But if the engine is small and less power, having too low ratio will give no power to pull/push the car. 4AT will have limited ratio number to play with because if put to low, the car will have no power to accelerate. Put too high (close to 3rd gear) will limit its top speed. actually for smaller engine, if you have a gear box specially tuned for it, it is still possible to save more fuel and at the same time with the correct power pull to the car. Take Polo for example. if they set the first 2 gear ratio to that of a normal AT4, it can still pull off at the same power. but as it reach higher speed, switching to a higher gear will not required it to need as much power as we think. Edited January 8, 2010 by Joseph22 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepica 4th Gear January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 you mean the former saves more right? ops... yup Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben5266 Supercharged January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 1.6 4AT 2.8krpm @100km/h will consume more fuel. 1.6 CVT 2krpm @100km/h will consume less. 1 rpm means, 1 fuel and air intake and an explosion per minute. Then, the 2nd cycle will be to push out the waste. So, 2k rpm, 1000 explosion per minute. 2.8k rpm, 1400 explosion per minute. So, if the engine capacity is the same, burning fuel 1000 times is less than burning fuel for 1400 time in 1 minute. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peaceracer 1st Gear January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 1.6 4AT 2.8krpm @100km/h will consume more fuel. 1.6 CVT 2krpm @100km/h will consume less. 1 rpm means, 1 fuel and air intake and an explosion per minute. Then, the 2nd cycle will be to push out the waste. So, 2k rpm, 1000 explosion per minute. 2.8k rpm, 1400 explosion per minute. So, if the engine capacity is the same, burning fuel 1000 times is less than burning fuel for 1400 time in 1 minute. Thats a very good way to make layman understand. Never thought of explaining it that way before. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peaceracer 1st Gear January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 Mine: Idling: 500 RPM 100 km/h: 1,800 RPM (flat road) 3.0V6 7A/T. So low?? Surprising. Maybe i suaku never sit in a big engine car b4. Anyway my 1.1M getz is abt 3000rpm at 100kmh, and 2500 at 70kmh. Somehow i which i had a 6th gear. Quite heart pain to hear it work so hard. BTW anyone knws why auto gearing is most of the time higher than the equivalent manual gearing? Shouldnt there be lesser losses in manual and thus able to use higher gearing thn auto for the same make and engine cap?? This puzzles me for a long time le... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph22 Turbocharged January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 So low?? Surprising. Maybe i suaku never sit in a big engine car b4. Anyway my 1.1M getz is abt 3000rpm at 100kmh, and 2500 at 70kmh. Somehow i which i had a 6th gear. Quite heart pain to hear it work so hard. BTW anyone knws why auto gearing is most of the time higher than the equivalent manual gearing? Shouldnt there be lesser losses in manual and thus able to use higher gearing thn auto for the same make and engine cap?? This puzzles me for a long time le... 4 gear as opppose to 5 or 6 gear?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levinx 3rd Gear January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 (edited) My 1.5L auto fit hovers around 1900RPM-2000RPM at 100km/hr.. Edited January 8, 2010 by Levinx Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolie888 Clutched January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 So low?? Surprising. Maybe i suaku never sit in a big engine car b4. Not 'so' low. Idling rpm is a strong function of engine capacity and tuning. The Merc's 3.0 V6 7A/T: Idling: 500 rpm 100 km/h: ~1800 rpm Previous Lexus 2.0 IL6 4A/T: Idling: 700 rpm 100 km/h: ~1900 rpm Previous BMW 2.5 IL6 5A/T: Idling: 800 rpm 100 km/h: ~2000 rpm Weight is a factor too. My BMW was an SUV. Compare that with my previous VW 2.0 IL4 Manual: Idling: 1000 rpm 100 km/h: ~2700 rpm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peaceracer 1st Gear January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 4 gear as opppose to 5 or 6 gear?? Hmmm, tat makes sense too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peaceracer 1st Gear January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 Not 'so' low. Idling rpm is a strong function of engine capacity and tuning. The Merc's 3.0 V6 7A/T: Idling: 500 rpm 100 km/h: ~1800 rpm Previous Lexus 2.0 IL6 4A/T: Idling: 700 rpm 100 km/h: ~1900 rpm Previous BMW 2.5 IL6 5A/T: Idling: 800 rpm 100 km/h: ~2000 rpm Weight is a factor too. My BMW was an SUV. Compare that with my previous VW 2.0 IL4 Manual: Idling: 1000 rpm 100 km/h: ~2700 rpm Ya, mine is abt 800 w/o AC and 900 with A/C. Really appreciate if the car can idle and criuse at low rpms. The trip will be much more comfy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TangoElite 6th Gear January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 My 1.5L auto fit hovers around 1900RPM-2000RPM at 100km/hr.. must be CVT wild guess, u driving axio? allion? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fcw75 Hypersonic January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 must be CVT wild guess, u driving axio? allion? Alamak bro, he said he driving fit oready leh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TangoElite 6th Gear January 8, 2010 Share January 8, 2010 (edited) Alamak bro, he said he driving fit oready leh. opps my csi Edited January 8, 2010 by TangoElite ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
Budget 2025 - February 2025.
Budget 2025 - February 2025.
Kyoto travel tips needed - baby in tow
Kyoto travel tips needed - baby in tow
family in austria
family in austria
Traveling with no check in luggage - share your experiences
Traveling with no check in luggage - share your experiences
KLIA, Langkawi airport among world’s best airports in 2Q22
KLIA, Langkawi airport among world’s best airports in 2Q22
Benefit to those who travel NORTH but always wanted to know
Benefit to those who travel NORTH but always wanted to know
Family short trips around Asia
Family short trips around Asia
Holiday to Thailand - Phuket - Bangkok - Chiangmai
Holiday to Thailand - Phuket - Bangkok - Chiangmai