Jump to content

Take this character test. How fair are you?


Ahtong
 Share

Recommended Posts

There is $20 million to be shared between 2 persons.

 

Person A decides how to share the money.

 

Person B decides whether or not to accept the proposed ratio.

 

If Person B accepts the ratio, both parties get the money. If Person B don't accept, nobody gets anything.

 

1) If you are person A, how would you split the $20 million?

 

2) If you are person B, will you accept if A offers you $1 million and keeps $19 million for himself?

 

 

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

There is $20 million to be shared between 2 persons.

 

Person A decides how to share the money.

 

Person B decides whether or not to accept the proposed ratio.

 

If Person B accepts the ratio, both parties get the money. If Person B don't accept, nobody gets anything.

 

1) If you are person A, how would you split the $20 million?

 

2) If you are person B, will you accept if A offers you $1 million and keeps $19 million for himself?

 

1) If i am A i would split 50:50

2) This is a tricky one, 1 million dollar is a lot of money to me now, i probably would take A offer. there is oso a possibility of wan to die die together

Link to post
Share on other sites

no info no explaination how to advice..

 

the money from where... hard work from single side or both side?? or inherit? or

 

no details how to justify is good or no good.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a) split 50:50

 

b) no. since u didn't mention that A can make a counter/improved offer. but if only got 1 chance, i'll sy "yes" assuming there must be a reason why A has the right to decide how the money is split, maybe he is the leader or he found the money, etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming that the 20 million happens to be dropped from the sky...

 

I'd accept it even if the other party offers me $100K [:p]

 

But if that 20 million is something that both myself & the other party worked equally hard for, I'd not accept anything less than 50:50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically question 1 tests how fair you are and question 2 tests your backbone vs practicality.

 

1) I would split the money 50:50

2) I am willing to accept if the offer is around 2:1 or better. If it is 19:1, I will sure ask the greedy busturd to fly kite. He got more to lose than me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is $20 million to be shared between 2 persons.

 

Person A decides how to share the money.

 

Person B decides whether or not to accept the proposed ratio.

 

If Person B accepts the ratio, both parties get the money. If Person B don't accept, nobody gets anything.

 

1) If you are person A, how would you split the $20 million?

 

2) If you are person B, will you accept if A offers you $1 million and keeps $19 million for himself?

 

1) 12 Million for B, 8 Million for myself (60/40 split, since he has the decision to deny both of us of money)

 

2) no.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is $20 million to be shared between 2 persons.

 

Person A decides how to share the money.

 

Person B decides whether or not to accept the proposed ratio.

 

If Person B accepts the ratio, both parties get the money. If Person B don't accept, nobody gets anything.

 

1) If you are person A, how would you split the $20 million?

 

2) If you are person B, will you accept if A offers you $1 million and keeps $19 million for himself?

 

Definitely a 50%-50% share.

 

I would accept if person A is giving mi out of good will.

If the money belong to mi too...die die i wan a 50% share.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hypothetical question only lah. [laugh]

 

In economics, there is something known as game theory and it is full of these interesting scenarios.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. 50/50.

2. Tough one. probably no.

 

Out of curiosity, to those who said "No" to the 2nd question what if it were 1 billion vs 19 billion? I know my answer will change to yes. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

this reminds me so much of prisoner's dilemma and game theory.

 

if I am person A, I will offer 1-2million if B is an average or poor person; but offer as much as needed to incentivise cooperation if B is super wealthy and already has millions to his name. of course, the critical thing is to act like I don't need the money as well, so that the pressure is on B (maybe I can dress as a monk? just not you-know-who)

 

if I am person B, before A make the offer, I will tell him that I will reject any offer less than $19 million and act super greedy (maybe not much acting involved here). then the pressure will be on A to decide if he wants to gamble with the $1 million.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...