Jump to content

Broquet


Turbobrick
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guys, I had Broquet dumped into my brick's fuel tank 2 years ago and it was the larger 8 pellet type. I did not feel or notice any significant power or fuel economy gains, anyone else with more positive results? [:|]

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

My older Mazda requires leaded fuel, dump the pellet into the tank tot that it might work.

 

No positive results.

 

2 Destructive Results

 

1 Jammed my fuel float (erratic reading, shows empty when tank is full)

2 and finally killed my fuel float (cannot register anything after 1yr)

 

 

 

Guys, I had Broquet dumped into my brick's fuel tank 2 years ago and it was the larger 8 pellet type. I did not feel or notice any significant power or fuel economy gains, anyone else with more positive results? [:|]
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

Tat sounds ssssseee...rrrrr....i...o..u...s, man! [shocked]

 

How old was your car when tat happenned....maybe due to its age?

 

Can claim that floaty thingy frm UC the distributor, perhaps?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Car was 15yrs old, float was a new replacement abt 2yrs old to have low fuel indicator function. Dont think it is aging lah. Cant be bothered to claim from UC, wats the point? Anyway new float only $45 for my Mazda [laugh]

 

 

 

Tat sounds ssssseee...rrrrr....i...o..u...s, man! [shocked]

 

How old was your car when tat happenned....maybe due to its age?

 

Can claim that floaty thingy frm UC the distributor, perhaps?

Edited by Shagmobil
Link to post
Share on other sites

jammed the float and ultimately whole fuel float kaput. [:/]

 

 

U mean the pellets jammed your fuel float or the reaction from the fuel and broquet? So jiat lat! [shocked]
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't trust the products anyway. The theory to me does not hold water, and I don't buy the idea either.

 

After reading your destructive results, confirm liao, this is a no no product for me.

 

Not only it does not give any noticeable result, it introduced Foreign Object Damage (FOD) to your fuel system inside the tank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The word 'FOD' is common in the aviation industry. It means any object that does not belong to the airplane that cause damage to it eg stone, pebbles, lost tools and lists goes on. If oil cause damage can also considered. [laugh][laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

At first I thought that since Broquet didn't give my 1.5yr old car much improvement when I first popped it into my fuel tank, it'll work better for "older" cars. Now after hearing horrer stories about old cars having problems with Broquet as well, seems like it should be left with the diesels and aircraft rotary engines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I installed Broquet in-line system (Boostmaster 30, to be exact) for my Ford Laser last December. Initially, fuel efficiency dropped. But gradually it improved. My friend, who read it somewhere, informed me that the drop in fuel efficiency is expected. Broquet had to clean the fuel system first. Once the system is cleaned, fuel efficiency comes back.

 

My car can now do 10km per litre, which I think is quite good for a 3 years old car.

 

For all the troubles the in-tank system is causing, maybe it is not suitable for all cars?

 

For worry-free driving, try the in-line system. No regret for me so far!

 

 

 

At first I thought that since Broquet didn't give my 1.5yr old car much improvement when I first popped it into my fuel tank, it'll work better for "older" cars. Now after hearing horrer stories about old cars having problems with Broquet as well, seems like it should be left with the diesels and aircraft rotary engines.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie
(edited)

The inline unit will definitely "treat" the fuel more evenly thus improving efficiency and economy.

 

One point to note is my brick's fuel map is tuned for rich mixture so economy will be bad irregardless of whatever crap thing I try to put in. In turn I've focus my mods to

power rather than economy since I have excess fuelling from the ECU's fuel map.

 

btw, yours a 1.3 or 1.6? Auto or manual? [:)]

Edited by Turbobrick
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

If the pellets are thrown into the tank, that's the end. To remove them the entire fuel tank has to be removed to fish out the pellets.

 

To prevent this, you can attach fishing string or nylon string to the pellets before dropping into the tank and leave the string outside the fuel pump cover.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine is a 1.6 auto.

 

 

 

The inline unit will definitely "treat" the fuel more evenly thus improving efficiency and economy.

 

One point to note is my brick's fuel map is tuned for rich mixture so economy will be bad irregardless of whatever crap thing I try to put in. In turn I've focus my mods to

power rather than economy since I have excess fuelling from the ECU's fuel map.

 

btw, yours a 1.3 or 1.6? Auto or manual? [:)]

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend's Mazda 323 1.6L auto 1999 model which is using the same engine as Ford Laser, now 80K+ on the odometer, still does 11km/L without any aftermarket gadgets.

 

You think your fuel catalyst thingy is working or not ? Did you check your consumption before installation ?

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...