Ccssgm 1st Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 UNABLE to get a straight answer from car salesmen, engineer Jenson Lee searched the Internet for fuel consumption figures for the Nissan Cefiro and Toyota Camry, the two cars on his shopping list. He found official data from the respective manufacturers ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo 1st Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 must compare full condition.. their petrol less sulphuric, they travel highways and at cooling condition, maintain pedal 70kmh engine not stressing, FC sure good one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ccssgm 1st Gear June 14, 2008 Author Share June 14, 2008 Also must depend on the Driver Right FOOT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 I concur with the report. Jap car brochures always have fantastic FC stated Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friendstar Supercharged June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 just like ur m2 fc gimmick also new jazz "claimed" to have 24km/litre PuI!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friendstar Supercharged June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 It ran a Toyota Prius hybrid and Jeep Patroit diesel on the same route involving a mix of urban and highway driving. The Toyota returned 14.1km/litre, 39 per cent worse than its official figure, while the Jeep managed to achieve 13.8km/litre, only eight per cent lower than what it was supposed to get. i always feel that hybrid cars are BULL Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friendstar Supercharged June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 u guys remember the recent newspaper article? got one NTUC director guy bought the prius hybrid and claimed that it runs at 25km/litre must be the on board computer again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 yar...tok about the FC of the Mz2 i'm furious again Thats the problem when have a new car coz during the time of purchase, not many pple actually have this car to tell u about the real world FC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 Toyota muz have paid that someone a large sum of $ to endorse their product. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 Hybrid cars are also freaking expensive and the performance sucks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nkps 1st Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 I concur with the report. Jap car brochures always have fantastic FC stated including your Mz2? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 Yes. I tink the brochure states 18km/l or something like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nkps 1st Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 so how much u get? but dun regret lar... is a handsome car anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickster 5th Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 (edited) Getting only around 12km/l if driving the same style as my Rio which gives me 13+. If acclerate like ah pek (at the speed whereby a SBS double-decker bus can out accelerate you slightly ) and strictly maintain around 80km/hr on highways. Can hit 14km/L. Thinking of joining u to become property agent now also gotta think twice and thrice liao Who ask me to get a very small car that drinks like a 1.8L MPV Edited June 14, 2008 by Rickster Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yaloryalor 5th Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 This means an average driver who covers 20,000km a year stands to save almost $600 annually in fuel costs alone if he chooses a car which can run for 9km on a litre of petrol, instead of one that does 8km/litre. Din realise this calculation. My current FC is about 2L lesser than previous ride then I am spending about *$1.2K higher in a year cos of poorer FC now * basing on current 95 octane petrol charge Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynaway 1st Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 damn boh liao... .wat mandatory fuel economy labelling.... all this stupid work by NEA..... nothing realistic done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo 1st Gear June 14, 2008 Share June 14, 2008 same for their Hifi system, always over stated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ccssgm 1st Gear June 14, 2008 Author Share June 14, 2008 I concur with the report. Jap car brochures always have fantastic FC stated In order go get Good Sale ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
The continuing GLOBAL stressful thread! Part III
The continuing GLOBAL stressful thread! Part III
2023 6th Generation Nissan Serena (C28)
2023 6th Generation Nissan Serena (C28)
Good Workshop To Repair Clutch and Gearbox for Auto Trans
Good Workshop To Repair Clutch and Gearbox for Auto Trans
Mother of ALL JAMs in at Checkpoint
Mother of ALL JAMs in at Checkpoint
Petrol Price Movement in Singapore
Petrol Price Movement in Singapore
All about smoking
All about smoking
Can/will china produce GOOD cars?
Can/will china produce GOOD cars?
Singapore ranked most liveable city in Asia for 20th straight year: ECA
Singapore ranked most liveable city in Asia for 20th straight year: ECA