Jump to content

New tyre from Hankook? Ventus V12 Evo


Garlic
 Share

Recommended Posts

how much u pump ? i am on 15" , they will usually put in 230......but i am using 240pa....still flex a bit, maybe need to try 250

 

I'm on 17 and 230kpa. Good to know that I'm not the only one who feels the same...

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I-love-xl,

 

Yep. I am on 205/R16/55. I had the same issue when I had just changed to V12 and was running ~130-150kmh in NSE (at 230kpa front and back). It feels a little "wobbly". It behaved fine when it is <120kmh.

 

Several months later at my next Msia trip, the "wobbly" feeling somehow disappeared at high speed. I was also at 230kpa (front and back) too. I cannot explained but since it disappeared, I just let it be.

 

In any case, when I am in SGP, I am on 250 kpa front and 240 kpa back. In those rare cases when I hit 140 kmh in SGP roads (after the tyres have been burn-in), I also do not have any "wobbly" feeling.

 

Maybe you can try higher pressure. Else, you may have to burn-in the tyres a little longer.

 

Best regards

 

Hi Enots,

 

Thanks for sharing your experience. It's exactly the same situation. below 120 is its fine. I'm on 217/50R17. 230kpa front and back.

hope it disappear soon after...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. I am on 205/R16/55. I had the same issue when I had just changed to V12 and was running ~130-150kmh in NSE (at 230kpa front and back). It feels a little "wobbly". It behaved fine when it is <120kmh.

 

Several months later at my next Msia trip, the "wobbly" feeling somehow disappeared at high speed. I was also at 230kpa (front and back) too. I cannot explained but since it disappeared, I just let it be.

 

i 'heard' at 180kmh also no wobble

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi bros,

 

any of you here on Falken 912 and changed to the v12?

 

wanna hear some reviews. any other comments are welcomed too. :)

 

thanks.

 

 

I used to have 912 on my previous ride. Its adequate and grip is acceptable most of the time.

Easy to wheelspin and aquaplaning seems more frequently.

 

Having said which, I change the car after 2mths on it. Overall, its really just acceptable. Nothing to scream abt.

Would give it a miss if I were you.

Edited by I-love-xl
Link to post
Share on other sites

i 'heard' at 180kmh also no wobble

 

Yet to try 180 on this. but if there is a chance on the NSHW, I will try provided its stable enough to do 160 first. Haha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wht's so special of having nitrogen air tires? [:/]

..My personal experience was my normal air tyres expanded from 32 to 48 when I reached Kuala Terengganu...but when I change to Nitrogen, the tyre expanded from 32 to 38 only..This means the tyre don get too hard and a harder tyres will adversely affect the braking distance and oso grip...

Link to post
Share on other sites

i 'heard' at 180kmh also no wobble

 

You are right. I still feel confident at ~180kmh on straight roads after I got pass the initial phase. I just cannot explain why the wobble ...... I had used the tyres for 1-2 months.....

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 13177,

 

From an engineering standpoint, the following website gives quite logical explanation of the pros on having N2 in tyres (EXCEPT the reasoning of "nitrogen and oxygen can permeate rubber, nitrogen does it much more slowly" part).

 

http://www.nitrogendirect.com/N2Info.htm

 

However, I feel that the trouble outweighs the gain, so I just use normal air.

 

Best regards.

Thanks for the information. Looks like using nitrogen tire many advantage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

..My personal experience was my normal air tyres expanded from 32 to 48 when I reached Kuala Terengganu...but when I change to Nitrogen, the tyre expanded from 32 to 38 only..This means the tyre don get too hard and a harder tyres will adversely affect the braking distance and oso grip...

Are you sure you are using tires with correct load index and pressure as specified from the manufacturer ? It seems the 32 tire pressure is grossly underinflated on your case

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet to try 180 on this. but if there is a chance on the NSHW, I will try provided its stable enough to do 160 first. Haha

 

Curious... the air will expand at high speed right? If we go NSHW, we should let out some air?

On the V12, done 190kmh at one point, but 150-160kmh on average, no issues.. Before trip pressure is 250kpa. Wasn't aware about the expansion thingy. Lucky nothing happened.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Curious... the air will expand at high speed right? If we go NSHW, we should let out some air?

On the V12, done 190kmh at one point, but 150-160kmh on average, no issues.. Before trip pressure is 250kpa. Wasn't aware about the expansion thingy. Lucky nothing happened.

 

Hi Solar,

 

I am also curious if we should let out some air during long distance /high speed travel. I had came across the following article quite some time back.

 

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/tec...e.jsp?techid=72

 

In summary, it says that as we travel at higher speed, the side of the tyres flex more times per second and it is bad for the tyres. In order to compensate for the increase number of flex that comes with higher speed, it is recommended to increase pressure at higher speed.

 

From the link, the recommendation for increase of pressure starts at 190kmh and beyond (for tyres which are W rating; V12 belongs to this rating group). Since it is practically not possible to consistently travel at >190kmh in NSHW, it seems that there is no need to do anything at all.

 

Maybe some experts can share your views. Thanks in advance!!!

 

PS : For me, before I travel along NSHW, I always reduce from 250kpa front/240kpa back to 230kpa front and back. I just feel more at ease mentally to reduce marginally the tyre pressure........Don't ask me why! ha!

 

Best regards.

Edited by Enots
Link to post
Share on other sites

i suppose also need to take into consideration the time spent travelling at high speed

now come to think about it... i was driving up to cameron highlands.. continuous driving for 7-8 hrs, only made 2 rest stops the whole trip up. didn't think about all these... [sweatdrop]

this is probably why nitrogen is recommended in this case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Solar,

 

The link is talking about travelling in the German Autobahn. So it seems applicable in your context too regarding 7-8 hrs of continuous travel. The only part not too applicable is the top speed allowed!

 

In any case, I think your situation seems ok.......if the report is applicable.

 

Yes, I think using N2 would be an advantage.

 

Best regards!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...