Jump to content

[Poll]Hammer Gang say locals face disadvantage, Lightning Gang say No FT you mati


Apollo
 Share

[Poll]Hammer Gang say locals face disadvantage, Lightning Gang say No FT you mati  

125 members have voted

  1. 1.

    • Yes, FT are stealing jobs under our noses
      55
    • Yes, FT cause my pay to be stagnant
      25
    • Dunno, Hammer, Lightning, SMLJ lai eh?
      5
    • No I dun agree with Wayang Party, they tok c0ck
      14
    • No... FT guud. esp those in geylang.. slurp
      26


Recommended Posts

(edited)

An area may be non contested, no candidate to walk in...

but there are chances that there > 50% of people that may go for the Non-MIW if such event could take places....

 

NOT 100%............. u seems pro MIW...ha

Edited by Lv3338
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

My mistake.

 

What I mean to illustrate is that with walk over in one constituency, the 'vote' is tallied under the only candicate for that contituency. My point was to show LV3338 his rationale for a 33% representation of OP is not correct.

 

Don't have to be firey before getting a clarification right? .... [:/]

Edited by Scoots
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

Jialat... one mis-reply and I am labelled Pro-MIW liow. [laugh] As I have explained above, my main point was to show that your 33%/66% rationale is incorrect.

 

I think you should read up all my responses to anything related to MIW before labelling me from reading only 1 posting.

Edited by Scoots
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

we all know what we talking...sometime is good to create confusing message....

so that they do not know we pro or anti MIW....

 

i see your point...33% of non-pro ...in actual there should be more...

u are trying to get my percentage right...i understand

 

But system transparency is more of my concern....

pro or anit MIW doesn't matter...as long it is a fair system... [flowerface]

Edited by Lv3338
Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

In actuality, there can be more and can be less... we don't know if those walkover areas have more than 33% for OP or less than 33% for OP.

 

A fair and transparent system should be unbiased.

 

Food for thought:

Don't you think your response of "in actual there should be more" very contradictory to what you are advocating for in the first place...

Edited by Scoots
Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries bro ... I DO see that my reply was poorly presented. [laugh]

 

Lucky I hung around ... else I can be sure of a lot more flames liow .... [laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

neither scoots nor myself are pro-miw.

 

perhaps you shd dig up some of our posts.

 

to be credible, one has to (TRY TO) be objective

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbocharged
An area may be non contested, no candidate to walk in...

but there are chances that there > 50% of people that may go for the Non-MIW if such event could take places....

 

NOT 100%............. u seems pro MIW...ha

 

actually i wonder, if there is chance of >50% may vote for non-miw, would the opposition be able to find out how sweet the ground is? because if they do, then they know where to contest. i think that with the strong membership base in hougang for WP, sure they know the ground there, but without members in other constituency, how? or they already know so maybe the contested constituency is already the better chance ones?

Link to post
Share on other sites

over 1 million mainland Chinese in out 4+ million population???!!... that's slightly less than quarter.

 

Lets say all the foreign workers (talents and labourers) all add up to be somewhere between a quarter to somewhere less than half the population, it's still a very alarming figure ....

 

Talk about Singapore identity, My Singapore, My Home... all BS. Looks more like Imported Singapore identity, My Singapore, THEIR home .... [:|]

Link to post
Share on other sites

in sg everything is abt paper..

 

so sometime, creative writing is impt... like creatively under reporting nos of pple to prevent pple fr questioning. or over reporting to boost numbers to their advantage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

(edited)

I am not surprise. Take a look ard us, we can see Cheena men n women so damn easy. Esp Geyland, Machiam little china liao [sly]

 

Take a walk in our neighbourhood, chances of us seeing cheenamen n women also damn high liao.

 

Go foodcourt at almost all the mall, u also will find Cheena men n women. Even sch..... cheena boy n girls also v common. Esp Jurong Point, flooded w FTs

 

If we realli need FT so much, y dun our gahment recruit Cheena men n women as Minister!!!!

Edited by Kingcopa
Link to post
Share on other sites

it's a guud idea... i mean instead of setting up retirement village in backyard batam or penang, it cud move to some sleazy town like dong guan, SZ or qing dao, plenty of an mor yuan, KTV...

 

thumbsup.gifthumbsup.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...